|
Sections
|
Good
3 points each
|
Fair
2 points each
|
Poor
1 point each
|
|
Introduction
|
Presents strong introduction of topic/concept. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed.
|
Conveys topic/concept.
Briefly describes subtopics to be reviewed.
|
Does not adequately convey topic/concept. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed.
|
|
Research articles - Nursing
|
Strong nursing peer reviewed research based support for the concept. Registered nurses listed as authors in all 4 articles.
|
Sources well selected to support the concept.
At least one registered nurse listed as an author in 3 articles.
|
Sources generally acceptable but not peer-reviewed research (evidence) based. Medicine or other discipline research article with at least one registered nurse listed as an author in 2 articles.
|
|
Research articles - Analysis
|
Focus on analysis of all 4 articles, rather than description when discussing the articles.
|
Includes most analysis of 2 or 3 articles. Includes some description.
|
Contains unsupported analysis when discussing the articles. Includes description.
|
|
Mental Health Setting
|
Provides 4 examples of applying the concept with the diagnosis in the mental health setting.
|
Provides 2-3 examples of applying the concept with the diagnosis in the mental health setting.
|
Provides at least one example of applying the concept with the diagnosis in the mental health setting.
|
|
Conclusion
|
A summary of the main points is clearly articulated.
Implications for mental health nursing practice are logical, relevant, and clear.
|
A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced. Implications for mental health nursing practice are included but lack logic, relevance, and/or clarity.
|
A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity is limited. Implications for mental health nursing practice are relevant.
|
|
Grammar and
Mechanics
|
The paper is free of or has one grammatical error, spelling and punctuation. Meets min/max page requirements.
|
The paper has 2 grammatical errors or spelling and punctuation are rare and do not detract from the paper. Meets min/max page requirements.
|
The paper has 3 or 4 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that interfere with reading the paper. Attempted to meet min/max page requirements.
|
|
Sections
|
Good
3 points each
|
Fair
2 points each
|
Poor
1 point each
|
|
APA Style and
Communication
|
No errors in APA style. Consistent and appropriate scholarly writing style. Writing is flowing and easy to follow.
|
Two errors in APA style that do not detract from the paper. Scholarly style. Writing has two awkward or unclear sentences.
|
Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear sentences.
|
|
Citations and
References
|
All citations and references are correctly written and present.
|
One citation or reference is missing or incorrectly written.
|
Two citations or references are missing or incorrectly written.
|