W8 Granth

profileDrgraham27
Evaluations-Week7.ppt
  • How important is the business need that the HPT effort is designed to address?
  • What gains in performance are needed to justify the expense of an improvement effort?
  • Which of several alternative HPT approaches is best?
  • How well is the solution working so far? Is it on track?
  • What changes should be made to keep the HPT effort on track and to make it more effective?
  • How much good has the initiative done?
  • What do clients think of the work and results that have been achieved?
  • What lessons have been learned from this current work that soudl guide future practice?
  • 1) Set HPT goals
  • 2) Analyze Performance Issues
  • 3) Design HPT initiative
  • 4) Implement HPT initiative
  • 5) Sustain impact
  • Level 1 (Reaction)
  • Level 2 (Learning)
  • Level 3 (Behavior)
  • Level 4 (Results)
  • Level 1 (Reaction)
  • completed participant feedback questionnaire
  • informal comments from participants
  • focus group sessions with participants
  • Level 2 (Learning)
  • pre- and post-test scores
  • on-the-job assessments
  • supervisor reports
  • Level 3 (Behavior)
  • completed self-assessment questionnaire
  • on-the-job observation
  • reports from customers, peers and participant’s manager
  • Level 4 (Results)
  • financial reports
  • quality inspections
  • interview with sales manager
  • Sources of data:
  • hardcopy and online quantitative reports
  • production and job records
  • interviews with participants, managers, peers, customers, suppliers and regulators
  • checklists and tests
  • direct observation
  • questionnaires, self-rating and multi-rating
  • Focus Group sessions
  • Collecting information about the nature and soundness of HPT activities.
  • Verifying assumptions and causal analysis.
  • Assist stakeholders in making decisions to steer the HPT to the most successful possible conclusion
  • Helps stakeholders to investigate past efforts
  • Helps stakeholders decide what has and had not worked well.
  • Helps stakeholders judge the worthiness of past efforts
  • Addresses:
  • Continuing efficiency
  • Effectiveness
  • Sustainability
  • Value
  • Alignment
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959) Evaluating Training Programs, 2nd ed., Berrett Koehler, San Francisco.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (comp.) (1998) Another Look at Evaluating Training Programs, ASTD, Alexandria, USA.
  • Pershing, J. A., Stolovitch, H. D., Keeps, E. J. (2006). Handbook of Human Performance Technology: Principles, Practices, and Potential, 3rd Edition, Pfeiffer (Wiley),