unit 14 taip

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

Description of Assignment: Student will administer, score, and interpret one nom-referenced and one criterion referenced assessment on a child 5 years old or younger. Students will complete protocols, complete written analysis of the student’s performance, including strengths and weaknesses, and identify appropriate goals for the student. FAU Academic Learning Compact (ALC) Indicators: Critical Thinking: Students will collect, analyze, synthesize, and make inferences from data collected. Written Communication: Students will demonstrate effective written communication skills to convey results of the Test Administrational and Interpretation Project.

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

Demographic Information FL-FAU- 3Cs.1c

ALC Indicator: Written Communication

All components* are provided; assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is clearly written with 1 or less writing errors per page. 4-5 points

Most components* are provided; assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is adequately written with 2 or fewer writing errors per page. 2-3 points

Some significant components* are provided; assignment is submitted on time but does not follow the required format; Assignment is written with 3 or fewer writing errors per page. 1-2 points

Assignment is missing significant components*; is not on time; assignment is not in the required format; assignment is not clearly written and/or has 3 or more writing

Failed to submit or failed to submit on time

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

errors per page; or, student did not attempt the assignment. 0 points

Administration and scoring of the Norm referenced test FL-ESOL- 2010.5.1.a

ALC Indicator: Written Communication

All components* are included, accurate test administration, accurate determination of scores; assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is clearly written with 1 or less writing errors per page. 18-20 points

All components* are included; majority of test administered accurately, accurate determination of scores. Assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is adequately written with 2 or fewer writing errors per

Some significant components* are included; some of test administered accurately, accurate determination of scores. Assignment is submitted on time but does not follow the required format. Assignment is adequately written with 3 or fewer writing errors per

Assignment is missing significant components*; test is not administered accurately; scores not accurately determined; assignment is not on time and/or in the required format; assignment is not

Failed to submit or failed to submit on time

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

page. 14-17 points

page. 1-13 points

clearly written and/or has 3 or more writing errors per page; or, student did not attempt the assignment. 0 points

Administration and recording of Criterion referenced assessment

ALC Indicator: Written Communication

All components* are included, accurately administered, accurate recording of components; assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is clearly written with 1 or less writing

All components* are included, accurately administered; most information recorded is appropriate and accurate. Assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. Assignment is adequately written with 2 or fewer

Some significant components* are included, accurately administered; some information recorded is appropriate and accurate. Assignment is submitted on time but does not follow the required format. Assignment is

Missing significant components*, test not administered; accurately recorded information is not appropriate or accurate; assignment is not on time and/or in

Failed to submit or failed to submit on time

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

errors per page. 23-25 points

writing errors per page. 18-22 points

adequately written with 3 or fewer writing errors per page. 1-17 points

the required format; assignment is not clearly written and/or has 3 or more writing errors per page; or, student did not attempt the assignment. 0 points

Administration and recording of Portfolio assessment

All components* are included, accurately administered, accurate recording of information; assignment is submitted on time and in the required

All components* are included, accurately administered; most information recorded is appropriate and accurate. Assignment is submitted on time and in the required

Some significant components* are included, accurately administered; some information recorded is inappropriate or inaccurate. Assignment is

Missing significant components*; not accurately administered; recorded information is not appropriate

Failed to submit or failed to submit on time

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

ALC Indicator: Written Communication

format. Assignment is clearly written with 1 or less writing errors per page. 18-20 points

format. Assignment is adequately written with 2 or fewer writing errors per page. 14-17 points

submitted on time but does not follow the required format. Assignment is adequately written with 3 or fewer writing errors per page. 1-13 points

or accurate; assignment is not on time and/or in the required format; assignment is not clearly written and/or has 3 or more writing errors per page; or, student did not attempt the assignment. 0 points

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

Interpretation of assessment information for intervention FL- ESOL-2010.5.1.a

ALC Indicator: Critical Thinking

Accurately identifies all strengths and weaknesses and identifies appropriate goals for intervention. Goals/instructional objectives are clearly linked to the assessment results. Assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. 9-10 points

Accurately identifies most strengths and weaknesses and identifies appropriate goals for intervention. Goals/instructional objectives are somewhat linked to the assessment results. Assignment is submitted on time and in the required format. 7-8 points

Accurately identifies strengths and weaknesses OR identifies appropriate goals for intervention. Goals/instructional objectives are occasionally linked to the assessment results. Assignment is submitted on time but does not follow the required format. 1-6 points

Does not identify the majority of strengths and weaknesses and does not identify appropriate goals for intervention. Goals/ instructional objectives are not linked to the assessment results; assignment is not on time and/or in the required format; or, student did not attempt the assignment. 0 points

Failed to submit or failed to submit on tim

Evaluation Rubric for Critical Assignment: Test Administration and Interpretation Project

EEX 3226 Test Administration and Interpretation Scoring Rubric

Exemplary (3 pts) Satisfactory (2 pts) Emerging (1 pt)

Unsatisfactory (0 pt)

No Submission

(0 pt)

*Components for each section are listed and described in the course syllabus.