PowerPoint

Evaluation Rubric - PowerPoint Presentation of an Assigned Composer

CATEGORY 4 – Accomplished 3 - Competent 2 – Developing 1 - Beginning

Conventions mechanics, spelling, sentence structure,

word forms

No serious errors; few minor errors.

A few errors which do not interfere with meaning.

Some serious errors that may interfere with meaning.

Many serious errors which persistently interfere with meaning.

Organization includes: appropriate length, order (logical,

chronological etc.) and transitions

Well-organized with appropriate structure and smooth transitions.

Generally well- organized; clear and logical flow of ideas. Fulfills the assignment.

Some structure and order evident.

No clear structure; organizational requirements not met.

Information retrieval

Retrieves much more than the required amount to complete the assignment; information retrieved meets the information need.

Retrieves the required amount of information for the assignment and the majority of it meets the information need.

Retrieves some of the information required for the assignment; some of the information retrieved may not meet the information need.

Retrieves little or none of the information required for the assignment; or, information retrieved clearly does not meet the information need.

Music Student consistently and correctly addresses musical elements and concepts of the music (Genre, style period, melody, rhythm, dynamics, tone color, harmony, texture, form, etc.).

Student correctly addresses at least five (5) musical elements and concepts of the music.

Student correctly addresses at least three (3) musical elements and concepts of the music.

Student correctly addresses less than three (3) musical elements and concepts of the music.

Citations Bibliography/works cited list is properly formatted and complete.

Bibliography/works cited list is complete, but not properly formatted (e.g. bulleted list).

Bibliography/works cited list is incomplete (e.g. no citations for images) or improperly formatted (e.g. list of URLs).

Student does not list sources used for research.

Evaluation of Sources

(ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY)

Information sources are highly relevant and evaluation of sources is highly nuanced.

Recognizes both the quality and relevance of information sources.

Recognizes the relevance of information sources but has difficulty evaluating their quality.

Little or no recognition of the relevance and quality (authority, currency, objectivity) of information sources.

The categories Conventions and Organization are each worth up to 10 points

4 = 10 points 3 = 8 points 2 = 6 points 1 = 4 points

The categories Information retrieval, Music, Citations and Evaluation of Sources are each worth up to 20 points

4 = 20 points 3 = 15 points 2 = 10 points 1 = 5 points

Letter Conversion

90 - 100% = A 80 - 89% = B 70 - 79% = C 60 - 69% = D below 60% = F