Evaluation of Technical Quality

Evaluation of Technical Quality Scoring Guide Grading Rubric

Criteria

Non-performance

Basic

Proficient

Distinguished

Identify the test and briefly describe the publisher's stated purpose for its use. 20%

Does not identify the test or describe the publisher's stated purpose for its use.

Identifies the test but does not describe the publisher's stated purpose for its use.

Identifies the test and briefly describes the publisher's stated purpose for its use.

Identifies the test and briefly describes the publisher's stated purpose for its use, including the population or psychological condition the test purports to address.

Review a specified test's evidence for reliability and support the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles. 20%

Does not review a specified test's evidence for reliability.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for reliability but does not support the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for reliability and supports the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for reliability, supports the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles, and correctly specifies the type of reliability and statistical measurement.

Review a specified test's evidence for validity and support the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles. 20%

Does not review a specified test's evidence for validity.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for validity, but does not support the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for validity, and supports the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles.

Reviews a specified test's evidence for validity, supports the analysis by citing at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles, and correctly specifies the type of validity and statistical measurement.

Synthesize information from the articles to evaluate the current state of the test's technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field. 20%

Does not synthesize information from the articles to evaluate the current state of the test's technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field.

Synthesizes information from the articles but does not evaluate the current state of the test's technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field.

Synthesizes information from the articles to evaluate the current state of the test's technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field.

Synthesizes information from the articles, and evaluates, in the context of psychometrics, the current state of the test's technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field.

Implement referencing, heading, and format elements of current APA style. 20%

Does not implement referencing, heading, and format elements of current APA style.

Implements some referencing, heading, and format elements of current APA style, but there are many deviations or omissions.

Implements referencing, heading, and format elements of current APA style.

Implements referencing, heading, and format elements of current APA style; the writing reflects the quality and expertise expected for doctoral-level work.