Prospectus Revision
ashe.a
EvalCorrctions.pdf
FINAL SCORE
Does not Meet
Evaluator added files :
Detailed Results
( Rubric used : DBA Prospectus Rubric)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
A. PROVIDES A “CURRENT” HOOK SUPPORTED BY PEER REVIEWED OR GOVERNMENT CITATION LESS THAN 5-YEARS OLD FROM ANTICIPATED GRADUATION DATE.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
This work has already been evaluated and released to the author. Use the tabs to the top right to view the evaluation report and work.
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
B. PROVIDES A “CURRENT” DATA DRIVEN ANCHOR SUPPORTED BY PEER REVIEWED OR GOVERNMENT CITATION LESS THAN 5-YEARS OLD FROM ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
C. STATES THE GENERAL BUSINESS PROBLEM NOTE: THIS ELEMENT SHOULD START AS FOLLOWS: THE GENERAL BUSINESS PROBLEM IS…
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
D. STATES THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM. BE SURE TO STATE WHO HAS THE SPECIFIC PROBLEM (I.E. SMALL BUSINESS LEADERS, PROJECT MANAGERS, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGERS, ETC.) NOTE: THIS ELEMENT SHOULD START AS FOLLOWS: THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM IS THAT SOME (IDENTIFY WHO HAS THE PROBLEM) …
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
E. ENSURES THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM ALIGNS WITH THE RESEARCH QUESTION AND PURPOSE STATEMENT.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.3) PROBLEM STATEMENT
F. PROBLEM STATEMENT DOES NOT EXCEED 150 WORDS.
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
A. IDENTIFIES THE RESEARCH METHOD AS QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE, OR MIXED-METHODS.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
B. IDENTIFIES RESEARCH DESIGN (I.E. CASE STUDY, PHENOMENOLOGICAL, QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL, CORRELATIONAL, ETC.).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
C. IF QUANTITATIVE OR MIXED METHOD: IDENTIFIES A MINIMUM OF TWO INDEPENDENT (EXPERIMENTAL/QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS) OR PREDICTOR (CORRELATIONAL DESIGNS) AND DEPENDENT VARIABLE(S). NOTE: THE QUANTITATIVE STUDY MUST INCLUDE AT LEAST TWO INDEPENDENT/PREDICTOR VARIABLES.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
D. IDENTIFIES SPECIFIC POPULATION GROUP FOR PROPOSED STUDY.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
E. IDENTIFIES GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THE STUDY.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
F. IDENTIFIES CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIAL CHANGE.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.4) PURPOSE STATEMENT: DESCRIBES THE INTENT OF THE RESEARCH. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS A MINI STORY AND MUST NOT EXCEED 200 WORDS. THE PURPOSE STATEMENT MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SIX ELEMENTS:
G. ENSURES THE FIRST SENTENCE LINKS/ALIGNS DIRECTLY WITH THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
0.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.5) NATURE OF THE STUDY: PROVIDES A BRIEF DISCUSSION ON THE RESEARCH METHOD (I.E. QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE) AND DESIGN (I.E. CORRELATION FOR QUANTITATIVE STUDY; PHENOMENOLOGICAL, CASE STUDY, ETC., FOR A QUALITATIVE DESIGN); CITE A MINIMUM OF ONE SOURCE (THE METHOD AND DESIGN WILL BE DISCUSSED IN GREATER DETAIL IN SECTION 2).
NOTE: A SINGLE PARAGRAPH CAN BE USED FOR EACH COMPONENT: ONE FOR THE METHOD AND ONE FOR THE DESIGN.
A. IDENTIFIES THE SELECTION OF ONE METHOD (QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS) AND WHY OTHER METHODS WOULD NOT WORK (CITE A MINIMUM OF ONE SOURCE).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.5) NATURE OF THE STUDY: PROVIDES A BRIEF DISCUSSION ON THE RESEARCH METHOD (I.E. QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE) AND DESIGN (I.E. CORRELATION FOR QUANTITATIVE STUDY; PHENOMENOLOGICAL, CASE STUDY, ETC., FOR A QUALITATIVE DESIGN); CITE A MINIMUM OF ONE SOURCE (THE METHOD AND DESIGN WILL BE DISCUSSED IN GREATER DETAIL IN SECTION 2).
NOTE: A SINGLE PARAGRAPH CAN BE USED FOR EACH COMPONENT: ONE FOR THE METHOD AND ONE FOR THE DESIGN.
B. IDENTIFIES THE SELECTION OF THE DESIGN (WITHIN THE METHOD) AND WHY IT WAS SELECTED OVER OTHER DESIGNS (CITE A MINIMUM OF ONE SOURCE).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.6) RESEARCH QUESTIONS (QUANTITATIVE ONLY)
A. LISTS RESEARCH QUESTION(S) IN ABOUT 10-15 WORDS (20 WORDS MAX).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.6) RESEARCH QUESTIONS (QUANTITATIVE ONLY)
B. ENSURES RESEARCH QUESTION(S) ALIGNS WITH THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM AND FIRST LINE OF THE PURPOSE STATEMENT.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.6) RESEARCH QUESTIONS (QUANTITATIVE ONLY)
C. INCLUDES THE INDEPENDENT/PREDICTOR AND DEPENDENT VARIABLES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PURPOSE STATEMENT.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.6) RESEARCH QUESTIONS (QUANTITATIVE ONLY)
D. LISTS RESEARCH SUB-QUESTIONS THAT ALIGN WITH EACH HYPOTHESES SET.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.7) HYPOTHESES (QUANTITATIVE/MIXED-METHOD ONLY):STATES, IN ACCURATE FORMAT, THE NULL AND ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES FOR EACH RESEARCH QUESTION.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.8) RESEARCH QUESTION - QUALITATIVE ONLY
A. LISTS OVERARCHING RESEARCH QUESTION IN ABOUT 10-15 WORDS (20 WORDS MAX).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE :
2.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.8) RESEARCH QUESTION - QUALITATIVE ONLY
B. ENSURES RESEARCH QUESTION ALIGNS WITH THE SPECIFIC BUSINESS PROBLEM AND PURPOSE STATEMENT.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
2.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.9) INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - QUALITATIVE ONLY
A. LISTS EACH INTERVIEW OR FOCUS GROUP QUESTION. QUESTIONS MUST CONTRIBUTE KNOWLEDGE TO THE RESEARCH QUESTION.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
2.00
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.9) INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - QUALITATIVE ONLY
B. ENSURES INTERVIEW/FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS ALIGN WITH THE RESEARCH QUESTION.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
2.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.10) THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: CLEARLY AND CONCISELY IDENTIFY THE THEORY/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IN QUANTITATIVE STUDIES, THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND IN QUALITATIVE STUDIES THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM. THE STUDENT WILL ARTICULATE THE THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WITH CONCEPTS FROM THE LITERATURE TO GROUND AND COMPLEMENT THE APPLIED BUSINESS STUDY.
THIS COMPONENT SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE. IT WILL BE EXPANDED UPON IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW.
A. IDENTIFIES AND DESCRIBES THE THEORY OR CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00 Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.10) THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: CLEARLY AND CONCISELY IDENTIFY THE THEORY/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IN QUANTITATIVE STUDIES, THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND IN QUALITATIVE STUDIES THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM. THE STUDENT WILL ARTICULATE THE THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WITH CONCEPTS FROM THE LITERATURE TO GROUND AND COMPLEMENT THE APPLIED BUSINESS STUDY.
THIS COMPONENT SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE. IT WILL BE EXPANDED UPON IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW.
B. IDENTIFIES THEORIST(S) OF THE THEORY OR CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (IF APPLICABLE).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.10) THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: CLEARLY AND CONCISELY IDENTIFY THE THEORY/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IN QUANTITATIVE STUDIES, THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND IN QUALITATIVE STUDIES THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM. THE STUDENT WILL ARTICULATE THE THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WITH CONCEPTS FROM THE LITERATURE TO GROUND AND COMPLEMENT THE APPLIED BUSINESS STUDY.
THIS COMPONENT SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE. IT WILL BE EXPANDED UPON IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW.
C. IDENTIFIES DATE OF THE THEORY OR CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (IF APPLICABLE).
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.10) THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: CLEARLY AND CONCISELY IDENTIFY THE THEORY/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IN QUANTITATIVE STUDIES, THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND IN QUALITATIVE STUDIES THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM. THE STUDENT WILL ARTICULATE THE THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WITH CONCEPTS FROM THE LITERATURE TO GROUND AND COMPLEMENT THE APPLIED BUSINESS STUDY.
THIS COMPONENT SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE. IT WILL BE EXPANDED UPON IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW.
D. IDENTIFIES KEY CONCEPTS/PROPOSITIONS/TENETS OF THE THEORY OR CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.10) THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: CLEARLY AND CONCISELY IDENTIFY THE THEORY/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IN QUANTITATIVE STUDIES, THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND IN QUALITATIVE STUDIES
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM. THE STUDENT WILL ARTICULATE THE THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WITH CONCEPTS FROM THE LITERATURE TO GROUND AND COMPLEMENT THE APPLIED BUSINESS STUDY.
THIS COMPONENT SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE. IT WILL BE EXPANDED UPON IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW.
E. IDENTIFIES HOW/WHY THE THEORY OR CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IS APPLICABLE AND FITS/APPLIES TO THE STUDY.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.13) SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
A. STATES WHY THE STUDY IS OF VALUE TO BUSINESS.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.13) SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
B. STATES HOW THIS STUDY MAY CONTRIBUTE TO EFFECTIVE PRACTICE OF BUSINESS (IMPROVEMENT OF BUSINESS PRACTICE).
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
SECTION 1 FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY QUALITY INDICATORS
(1.13) SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
C. IDENTIFIES HOW THE RESULTS MIGHT CONTRIBUTE TO POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
GENERAL COMMENTS COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING INDICATORS OF QUALITY APPLY TO THE MANUSCRIPT AS A WHOLE.
WRITING STYLE AND COMPOSITION
THE DBA DOCTORAL PROPOSAL IS WRITTEN IN SCHOLARLY LANGUAGE (ACCURATE, BALANCED, OBJECTIVE, TENTATIVE). THE WRITING IS CLEAR, PRECISE, AND AVOIDS REDUNDANCY/ERRORS. STATEMENTS ARE SPECIFIC AND TOPICAL SENTENCES ARE ESTABLISHED FOR PARAGRAPHS. THE FLOW OF WORDS IS SMOOTH AND COMPREHENSIBLE. BRIDGES ARE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN IDEAS. FEW DIRECT QUOTES EXIST.Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
EXIST.
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
GENERAL COMMENTS COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING INDICATORS OF QUALITY APPLY TO THE MANUSCRIPT AS A WHOLE.
ORGANIZATION AND FORM
THE PROPOSAL/DBA DOCTORAL STUDY IS IN APA, 6TH EDITION FORMAT
a. IS LOGICALLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY ORGANIZED, USING SUBHEADINGS WHERE APPROPRIATE,
b. HAS A PROFESSIONAL, SCHOLARLY APPEARANCE, c. IS WRITTEN WITH CORRECT GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION, AND SPELLING; DOES NOT
CONTAIN ANTHROPOMORPHISMS d. INCLUDES CITATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: QUOTATIONS, PARAPHRASING,
FACTS, AND REFERENCES TO RESEARCH STUDIES, AND e. IN-TEXT CITATIONS ARE FOUND IN THE REFERENCE LIST; REFERENCES HAVE
CORRESPONDING IN-TEXT CITATIONS, f. APPENDICES INCLUDE DOCUMENTS TO SUPPORT DATA COLLECTION (CONSENT
TO PARTICIPATE, ORGANIZATIONAL PERMISSION, ANY RAW DATA/INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTIONS, ETC.)
g. TABLE OF CONTENTS HAVE APPROPRIATE APPENDICES ANNOTATED
h. TABLES AND FIGURES ARE APPROPRIATELY IN APA, 6 TH EDITION FORMAT
0. NOT MET 1. MET 2. NA
CRITERION SCORE :
1.00
Printed on: 02/18/2021 08:57:15 PM (EST)
