Emerging Threats & Counter Measures_Responses

Discussion 1: The only effective authority in the United States to bring cybercriminals to justice is the FBI and Homeland Security Investigation (HSI) unit. Unfortunately, the FBI and HSI often have challenges with getting known cybercriminals extradited to the USA for prosecution.” This indicates that a partial solution is available, but it still doesn't overcome the total difficulty level moving forward. The major barrier to the enforcement of cybercrime laws wherever attempts are made anywhere globally is the nature of the evidence available in the custody of prosecution and the admissibility of the same during the course trial of cybercriminals. (Ajayi, E. F. G, 2016) The major factors involved are cost, time, and efforts incurred in investigation and prosecution, followed by lack of adequate legislation and ineffective ones where cybercrime occurs. The absence of one universal law governing cybercrimes is another major defect in prosecuting cybercrimes. Apart from these, proof of the hacker's cybercrime/identity is the major challenge to be obtained these days. We all knew that Prevention is better than cure. People should be aware of being careful and not revealing their confidential information like OTP, credit card/debit card details, and anonymous calls/emails. In an article of EastBay today, Dow explains. "We are trying to adapt so we can catch and prosecute them, but it's becoming more and more difficult since there are a lot of different agencies across the state, and there's not a real clear standard on how to gather the evidence." It is another perfect example to describe the difficulty level of prosecution. Reference: Ajayi, E. F. G. (2016). Review Challenges to enforcement of cyber-crimes laws and policy. Journal of Internet and Information Systems, 6(1), 1-12.10.5897/JIIS2015.0089 Discussion 2: This barrier is the primary one to prosecuting the cyber-crime. Many times, an individual obligating the crime is placed exterior to the country or minimum exterior the legal jurisdiction of prosecutors and court searching the belief. It will be hard enough to efficiently prosecute the cyber-criminal when they create the similar jurisdiction as the fatality, but near to incredible when both exist in the various and dissimilar localities (Duke &Agbaji, 2017). States, cities and locations have contain a hard time estimating what is legal or what is not legal in the computer domain for the certain locality, certainly when that crime consists computers or individuals exterior of their respective jurisdiction. For an instance, when porn is illegal in the certain location but it can be accessed on the computer which is placed exterior to that location, is it illegal? Some systems of the local courts will agree with this, but some other will not agree with this. For that cause, many tiny objects leave it to the central legal system to prosecute and explain computer crime. The massive popularity of the internet crimes will not ever report. People can comprehend why. Many of the individuals have no idea of how to report and where to report internet crime. If they know, hardly does whatever come of it.Many of individuals believe that they are able to gather evidence that could lead to arrest and identification of some individual (Gabrys, 2019). Bullet proof indication of the cybercrime will be very complex to obtain. For an instance, presume an individual obtain a correct log file that displays an intruder breaking into the individual’s system. An individual can copy that log file and provide it to the police, but hardly will it endure the attack a defense attorney is probably to toss at it. When crime happens, law enforcement officers and computer professionals will come forward to endure the evidence gathered could hold up in court. References Duke, O., &Agbaji, D. (2017). The Pursuit of Good Governance and the Anti-Financial Corruption Blitz in Nigeria: A Study of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) (2003-2016). Asian Research Journal Of Arts & Social Sciences, 2(4), 1-16. Gabrys, E. (2019). The International Dimensions of Cyber-Crime, Part 2: A Look at the Council of Europe's Cyber-Crime Convention and the Need for an International Regime to Fight Cyber-Crime. Information Systems Security, 11(5), 24-32.