|
|
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
Score
|
|
Ethical Issue in the workplace (30%)
Describes an ethical issue that has occurred in the workplace and the impact on patient/families and healthcare workers
Analyzes ethical issue using ethical principles.
Discusses Provisions of the Code of Ethics for Nurses, 2015 that were not upheld for this issue.
|
Does not identify an ethical issue that has occurred in the workplace.
Does not relate/minimally relates ethical principles to ethical issue.
AND/OR
No discussion of Code of Ethics for Nurses.
0-20 points
|
Describesan ethical issue that has occurred in the workplace.
Minimal analysis /minimal discussion of ethical principles.
No discussion of Code of Ethics for Nurses.
21-23 points
|
Describes an ethical issue that has occurred in the workplace.
Analyzes of ethical issue using 2ethical principles.
States a specific area of Code of Ethics for Nurses, 2015 that was not upheld for this issue.
24-27 points
|
Thoroughly describesan ethical issue that has occurred in the workplace.
Analyzes ethical issue using 3
or moreethical principles.
Discusses Provisions of the Code of Ethics for Nurses, 2015 that were not upheld for this issue.
28-30 points
|
|
|
Applies the Ethical Decision-making Model (25%) Use an ethical decision-making model to analyze the issue. Makes recommendations of how this issue can best be addressed in the future.
|
Does not use the Integrated ethical-decision making toolto analyze the issue.
Provides an incomplete analysis of the issue.
Recommendation is brief, unclear, or does not represent an appropriate way to address the issue,
OR
no recommendation is present.
0-17 points
|
Refers to the Integrated Ethical
Decision-making model to analyze the issue.
Misses analysis of some steps of the ethical decision-making model. No discussion provided.
Makes 2 recommendations of how this issue can best be addressed in the future.
18-19 points
|
Uses each step of the Integrated Ethical Decision-making model to analyze the issue with limited discussion of application to the issue.
Provides 2 substantive recommendations of how this issue can best be addressed in the future.
20-21 points
|
Writes each step and explicitly
uses each step of the Integrated Ethical decision- making modelto thoroughly analyze the issue.
Makes 3 substantive recommendations of how this issue can best be addressed and resolved in the future with rationale.
23-25 points
|
|
|
Varying Points of View of Issue and Personal View (20%)
Discusses varying viewpoints about ethical issues in the workplace. Include their values, beliefs and culture that affect their views.
Discusses personal view of the issue and relates it to your PersonalEthical lens.
|
Does not identify or minimally identifies
varying viewpoints about the issue.
OR
Minimal/no description of the impact of ethical issue on patient/families, and healthcare workers.
Does not discuss personal view or relate issue to the Personal Ethical Lens.
0-11 points
|
Identifies varying viewpoints about the issue, and the impact on patient/families and healthcare workers.
AND
Identifies personal view of the issue but does not relate to the PersonalEthical Lens.
12-15 points
|
Discusses varying viewpoints about theissue, and the impact on patient/families and healthcare workers
AND
Discussespersonal view of the issue and how it relates tothePersonalEthical Lens.
16-17 points
|
Thoroughly discusses varying viewpoints about issue, and the impact on patient/families and healthcare workers.
Include the values, beliefs and culture that affect the varying viewpoints.
AND
Discusses personal view of the issue and relates it to PersonalEthical Lens.
18-20 points
|
|
|
Writing quality (10%)
Communicates through writing that is concise, clear and logically organized
Writes in complete sentences.
No grammar, spelling, punctuation or syntax errors.
Does not exceed the page limit.
|
More than 3errors of any type.
Exceeds page limit by 2 pages or more.
0-6 points
|
3 errors of any type.
Exceeds page limit
by 1 page.
7 points
|
No more than 2errors of any type.
Does not exceed the page limit.
8 points
|
No grammar, spelling, punctuation or syntax errors.
Writes logically in complete sentences.
Does not exceed the page limit.
9-10 points
|
|
|
APA format
(10%)
Correctly uses APA format in writing and citations.
|
There are 5 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, in-text citations or reference page(s).
Does not follow or partially follows template pattern.
0-6 points
|
There are 3 -4 format errors in thetext, title page, in-text citations or reference page(s).
Followstemplate pattern.
7 points
|
There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, in-text citations or reference page(s).
Follows template pattern.
8 points
|
Text, title page, reference page(s), and in-text citations are consistent with APA format.
Follows template pattern.
9-10 points
|
|
|
Total
100 points
|
Total Points Earned and Comments
|
|
ethicspaperrubric.docx
0
