Ethics and conduct of accounting profession

Ethicsandconductofaccountingprofession.pdf

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Accounting homework help >Ethics and conduct of accounting profession

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession by Wejdan AL Yaqoobi

Submission date: 16-Nov-2020 01:19PM (UTC+0400) Submission ID: 1447630998 File name: EthicsinAccounting_1.docx (66.14K) Word count: 2014 Character count: 9614

Discuss the fundamental ethical principles that the accountant should follow Integrity, objectivity, confidentiality.....

Discuss the egoism theory

good.

3% SIMILARITY INDEX

1% INTERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICATIONS

3% STUDENT PAPERS

1 2% 2 1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches < 20 words

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to St. Patrick's College Student Paper

www.tandfonline.com Internet Source

FINAL GRADE

/20

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

The formative feedback provided is for the individual assignment.

Fair attempt.

There are few suggestions for improvement provided. Please refer to in-text comments.

- Shows understanding of basic issues/theory

-Shows evidence of understanding of concepts

-No major grammatical/spelling errors

Satisfactory presentation of matter

PAGE 1

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word. Additional Comment

College

PAGE 2

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Comment 1

you are repeating what is said in the scenario here. Requirement is to discuss the ethical obligation of Rehab as an audit trainee.

P/V You have used the passive voice in this sentence. Depending upon what you wish to emphasize in the sentence, you may want to revise it using the active voice.

PAGE 3

Prep. You may be using the wrong preposition.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word. Consider using the article the.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Confused You have used its in this sentence. You may need to use it's instead.

Article Error You may need to remove this article.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Comment 2

Missing "," You may need to place a comma after this word.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Text Comment. Discuss the fundamental ethical principles that the accountant should follow Integrity, objectivity, confidentiality.....

PAGE 4

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Confused You have used its in this sentence. You may need to use it's instead.

Text Comment. Discuss the egoism theory

Text Comment. good.

Missing "," You may need to place a comma after this word.

Article Error You may need to remove this article.

Sp. This word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proofread your work.

PAGE 5

Comment 3

based on the deontological ethics - expectation is to follow the moral rules and perform your duties according to rules. Explain the given action based on deontological ethical theory.

Verb This verb may be incorrect. Proofread the sentence to make sure you have used the correct form of the verb.

Prep. You may be using the wrong preposition.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

P/V You have used the passive voice in this sentence. Depending upon what you wish to emphasize in the sentence, you may want to revise it using the active voice.

Sp. This word is misspelled. Use a dictionary or spellchecker when you proofread your work.

Article Error You may need to remove this article.

PAGE 6

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Missing "," You may need to place a comma after this word.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word. Consider using the article the.

P/V You have used the passive voice in this sentence. Depending upon what you wish to emphasize in the sentence, you may want to revise it using the active voice.

Possessive You may need to use an apostrophe to show possession.

Missing "," You may need to place a comma after this word.

PAGE 7

S/V This subject and verb may not agree. Proofread the sentence to make sure the subject agrees with the verb.

Article Error You may need to use an article before this word.

Verb This verb may be incorrect. Proofread the sentence to make sure you have used the correct form of the verb.

Missing "," You may need to place a comma after this word.

PAGE 8

RUBRIC: ECAP TAKE HOME EXAM

SEC A - Q 1A (20%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

0 / 100

a) Discuss the motive for earnings management with suitable examples

Little or no relevant knowledge included in discussing the motives of earnings management. No or minimal understanding of the key theories. Poor knowledge application. Poor written skills-spelling, grammar construction of sentences. Poor structure of presentation

Failed to discuss the key points related to the topic. hows minimal understanding of the topics. Poorly presented and structured but partially. Poor structure of presentation understandable. Meaning often unclear

Minimal acceptable. Few motives were listed. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

"Minimal acceptable. Motives of earnings management were listed. Expected the student to discuss the motives with suitable examples. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation"

Acceptable. The motives of earnings management were discussed. Few key points were missing. Expected the student to elaborate on the given key points. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt the motives of earnings management were discussed with few examples. here are few more key points which is expected by the student to elaborate further. Shows understanding of basic issues/theory. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good the motive of the earnings management were discussed with few suitable examples. There is room for improvements. Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

"Very good the motive of the earnings management were discussed with suitable examples. There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner. "

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC A - Q 1B (10%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

Excellent the motive of earnings management were discussed with suitable examples. All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding the motive of earnings management were discussed with suitable examples. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

b. Evaluate earnings management from the utilitarian perspective. Can earnings management be an ethical practice? Explain why or why not.

Minimal acceptable. Few points related to earnings management / utilitarian theory is listed. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

"Minimal acceptable. Few points related to earnings management / utilitarian theory is listed/ stated. Failed to evaluate and justify. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation"

Acceptable. The rationalization based on utlitarian aspect for earnings management discussed. Few key points were missing. Expected the student to evluate and justify the given key points. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt the rationalization based on utiliatirianism for earnings management is explained. Few key points are missing. Further student is expected to evaluate and justfy the argument. Shows understanding of basic issues/theory. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had evaluated the earnings management under the utilitarianism perspective. There is room for improvements. Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical,

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC A - Q2 (30%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

"Very good. Student had evalutaed the earnings mangement under the utlitarian perspective. There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner. "

Excellent. The student had evaluated the earningas management with relation to utilitarian perspective. And clearly justify on whether it is acceptable or not. All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. The student had evaluated the earningas management with relation to utilitarian perspective. And clearly justify on whether it is acceptable or not.. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

Craft a response that you feel comfortable by describing the characteristics of ethical leaders, the role of moral intensity in developing ethical organisations and evaluating the importance of ethical leadership in accounting firms with suitable examples

Minimal acceptable. Few points related to ethical leadership/ moral intesity / organisational culture is listed/ stated. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable. points related to ethical leadership/ moral intesity / organisational culture is listed/ stated. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. The organisational culture, ethical leadership and moral intensity were breifly explained Few key points were missing. Failed to create a link between the ethical

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC B -1 (9%)

SCALE 1 (10)

leadership, moral intensity and organisational culture. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had explained the concepts of organisational culture, ethical leadership and moral intensity. Few key points are missing. Could have created the link between the discussed topics Shows understanding of basic issues/theory. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had explained the concept of organisational culture, moral intensity and ethical leadership. Further attempt to discuss the link between the given three concept There is room for improvements. Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

"Very good. Student had discuss the concept of organisational culture, ethical leadership and moral intensity. Further discussed on few points how the high degree of moral intensity and ethical leadership leads to ethical organisational culture There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner. "

Excellent. Student had evaluated the concept of organisational culture, ethical leadership and moral intensity. Further analysed on how the high degree of moral intensity and ethical leadership leads to ethical organisational culture All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had evaluated the concept of organisational culture, ethical leadership and moral intensity. Further analysed on how the high degree of moral intensity and ethical leadership leads to ethical organisational culture Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

key fundamental ethical principles for accountants that are more relevant for the given scenario

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

of presentation

Minimal acceptable. Few points related to fundamental ethical principles were listed. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable. All points related to fundamental ethical principles were listed barely/not explained / inaccurate explanaiton. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. The fundamental ethical principles were stated/ breifly explained. Not related to the given scenario. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had explained fundamental ethical principles. Few key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had explained the fundamental ethical principles. Could have been more accurate in relating to the given scenario Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

"Very good. Student had explained the fundamental ethical principles related to given scenario There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner. "

Excellent. Student had explained the key fundamental ethical principles relating accuatedly with the given scenario All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had evaluated the key fundamental ethical principles relating accuatedly with the given scenario. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of

SEC B - 2 (6%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

threats to independent faced my Mariam

Minimal acceptable. Few points related to threats to independence were listed. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable. All points related to threats to independence were listed barely/not explained / inaccurate explanaiton. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. The threats to independence were stated/ breifly explained. Not related to the given scenario. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had explained threats to independence. Few key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had explained the threats to independence. Could have been more accurate in relating to the given scenario Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

Very good. Student had explained the threats to independence related to given scenario There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner.

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC B - 3 (5%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

Excellent. Student had explained the key threats to independence faced by Maryam . All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had evaluated the key threats to independence relating accuatedly with the given scenario. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

ethical issue faced by Mariam in the given scenario

Minimal acceptable. Few points related to ethical issues were stated. Information provided deviates from the requiremetn. Weak conclusion. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable. ethical issue is written but most of the points deviates from the requirement. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. The ethical issue faced by Maryam is breifly stated. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had attemped explain the ethical issue faced by Maryam. Few key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had explained the ethical issue faced by Maryam. Could have been more accurate in relating to the given scenario Major facts are understood. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC B - 4 (5%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7

Very good. Student had explained the ethical issue faced by Maryam relating to given scenario There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner.

Excellent. Student had explained the key ethical issue faced by Maryam . All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had evaluated the key issues faced by Maryam relating accuatedly with the given scenario. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

the stakeholders who will affected due to the given practices

Minimal acceptable. Few stakeholders were generally listed. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable.few stakeholders were generally stated, not related with the given scenario. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. Few key stakeholders were discussed. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had attemped state the key stakeholders. Few key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had stated the few key stakeholders Major facts are understood.

(70)

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC B - 5 (5%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6

Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

Very good. Student had stated the key stakeholders. There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner.

Excellent. Student had explained key stakeholders . All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had explained in detail the key stakeholders and the impacts. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

who are the people Mariam can get connected to resolve the ethical issue.

Minimal acceptable. Few people were listed but not related to given scenario. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable.few people were listed that Maryam can connet with. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. The people who Maryam connect to ethical dilemma were listed. Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Student had stated few people who Maryam can connect to resolve the

(60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

SEC B - 6 (10%)

SCALE 1 (10)

SCALE 2 (20)

SCALE 3 (30)

SCALE 4 (40)

ethical dilemma. key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had stated the few main peope Maryam can connect with during resolving the ethical dilemma faced by her. Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

Very good. Student had stated the few main people who Maryam can get connect and breifly explained. There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner.

Excellent. Student had stated the main people who Maryam can get connect and explained . All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. Student had stated the main people who Maryam can get connect and clearly justified the reason. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

0 / 100

the possible course of action that should be taken to resolve the ethical issue

Minimal acceptable. Few points were generally discussed not related to the scenario. Generally understandable, but lanugate contains frequesnt errors which distract from the requirement. Shows limited organisation. Poor structure of presentation

Minimal acceptable. the steps were discussed but not related to given scenario. Shows lack of understainding in basic topic. Weak conclusion. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.Generally

SCALE 5 (50)

SCALE 6 (60)

SCALE 7 (70)

SCALE 8 (80)

SCALE 9 (90)

SCALE 10 (100)

understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the requirement. Poor structure of presentation

Acceptable. Few actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue were stated . Main points are present with limited detail and development. Some critical thinking is present.Minimal understanding of basic topic. Appropriate examples were not provided.

Good attempt. Few actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue were breifly explained . key points are missing. Could have linked with the given scenario. Shows evidence of understanding of concepts. Coverage of obvious ideas. Materials used are relevant. Conclusion in place but key points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge.

Good. Student had stated few actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue were explained . Reasoned argument and sequencing. Few key points were not discussed could have improved further. Discussion shows relationship to theory. Conclusions well developed, analytical, and show some originality. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming an integrated part of overall argument and/or discussion.

Very good. Student had explained the actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue. There is room for imporvement. Detailed coverage of basic concepts/theory. Reasonable coverage of subtle issues/theory. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity. Critical thinking is weaved into points Well informed and generally accurate information provide. Material used is relevant. Intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge. Ideas expressed in a clear and coherent manner.

Excellent. Student had explained the actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue in detail. . All materials used were relevant. Touches upon all relevant issues/theory. Concise analysis. Information provided were material. There is room for improvement. Excellent conclusion. Brings together all concepts and adds an original perspective

Outstanding. tudent had explained the actions that Maryam should follow to the resolve the issue in detail. and clearly justified the reason. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic.Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession

by Wejdan AL Yaqoobi

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession

ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES

Ethics and conduct of accounting profession

GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

RUBRIC: ECAP TAKE HOME EXAM 0 / 100