Reflective Essay

profileDonald Nelson Jr
ETHICS_TermProject_3_Jesus_And_Greatest_Good.docx

Business Ethics Updated: Fall 2020

Reflective Essay Project #3 – Jesus & Greatest Good

Personal Reflection / Utilitarianism & Christianity

Purpose: Understanding the Bible and how it fits or counters culture is critical to being a strong apologist for what you believe. This essay will have you synthesize two of the world’s most prevalent philosophies regarding human life and treatment of others. As a reminder:

Deontological  ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on a moral code. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration. ... In the other hand, Utilitarian ethics state that a course of action should be taken by considering the most positive outcome for the greatest good.

Process:

· After reading Chapter 9 & 10 and researching Deontological Ethics, you will compare and contrast these philosophies to Jesus’ actions.

· Find three examples and determine whether Jesus was acting out of these philosophies, or how you may be able to bridge the gap with someone who believes this way to better understand Jesus Motivations.

· You MUST address, Jesus dying on the cross in your three examples, the other two are up to you, but should be used to support your point of view.

· Lastly, you will reflect on how these reflections change or impact your previous perceptions of Christ and his work here on Earth.

· Here are some questions to ponder which may guide you in your analysis:

· What was Jesus’ source of motivation in this action? Who was his action addressed to/witnessing to (audience of and around him?)

· Is this an isolated case in the Bible, if not, what do other instances say about His actions? Are they consistent?

· How does the world view this action? How do you know?

· Which of these frameworks you are analyzing fits in this situation?

· How do the Biblical Themes inform this action?

· How has your thinking been reinforced, challenged, or shifted based on this analysis? What does that mean?

Paper Format:

· Your paper should be at least 3 pages in length written in essay format and consistent with APA formatting. Please do NOT just copy/paste and answer questions – synthesize your thoughts.

RUBRIC:

RUBRIC:

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Excellent

Above Average

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable

Requirements Click for more options

Weight 25.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

Strong introduction of topic, terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement. All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics and main topics. Thoroughly addresses and answers all questions. Includes transparent, personalized reflections and the impact on their thinking.

80.00 to 89.00 %

Conveys topic. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. Most material clearly related to subtopic, main topic, and logically organized within subtopics. Clear, varied transitions linking subtopics and main topic. Answers most of the questions thoroughly. Some reflections are present; however, they are missing transparency or personalization.

70.00 to 79.00 %

Topic is somewhat unclear. Describes subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. Some material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions. Some of the questions are answered thoroughly. Limited reflections present.

0.00 to 69.00 %

Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate thesis statement. Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics, or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent. Most of the questions are not answered thoroughly. No reflections.

Critical Thinking Click for more options

Weight 25.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

Strong use of professional and/or peer reviewed research-based support to answer questions, including course textbook. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with classroom learning. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.

80.00 to 89.00 %

Some use of professional and/or peer reviewed research-based support to answer questions, including course textbook Some review of key conclusions. Some integration with classroom learning. Utilizes discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.

70.00 to 79.00 %

Limited use of professional and/or peer reviewed research-based support to answer questions, including course textbook Limited review of key conclusions. Little integration with classroom learning. Some discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.

0.00 to 69.00 %

No use of professional and/or peer reviewed research-based support to answer questions, including course textbook No review of key conclusions. No integration with classroom learning. No discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.

Mechanics Click for more options

Weight 25.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

The paper is free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Scholarly style. Writing is flowing and easy to follow. Minimum length requirements are met.

80.00 to 89.00 %

Grammatical and/or spelling and punctuation errors are rare and do not detract from the paper. Scholarly style. Writing has minimal awkward or unclear passages. Minimum length requirements are slightly lacking.

70.00 to 79.00 %

Very few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper. More informal tone than scholarly. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages. Minimum length requirements are significantly lacking.

0.00 to 69.00 %

Grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors substantially detract from the paper. Informal tone. Writing is choppy with many awkward or unclear passages. Minimum length requirements are substantially lacking.

APA Formatting Click for more options

Weight 25.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

No errors in APA

80.00 to 89.00 %

1-5 APA errors

70.00 to 79.00 %

6-10 APA errors

0.00 to 69.00 %

11 or more APA errors

Unacceptable

0.00 to 69.00 %

11 or more APA errors

Page 2 of 2

Business Ethics

Updated:

Fall 2020

Page

1

of

2

Reflective Essay

Project

#

3

Jesus & Greatest Good

Personal Reflection /

Utilitarianism & Christianity

Purpose:

Understanding the Bible and how it fits or counters culture is critical to being

a strong apologist for what you believe.

This essay will have you synthesize two of the

world’s most prevalent philosophies

regarding human life and treatment of others. As a

reminder:

Deontological

ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right

or

wrong

based on a moral code. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration.

... In the other hand,

Utilitarian

ethics state that a course of

action should be taken by

considering the most positive outcome for the greatest good.

Proces

s:

·

After reading Chapter 9 & 10 and researching Deontological Ethics, you will compare

and contrast these philosophies to Jesus’ actions.

·

Find

three

examples and

determine whether Jesus was acting out of these philosophies,

or how you may be able to bridge the gap with someone who believes this way to better

understand Jesus Motivations.

·

You MUST address, Jesus dying on the cross

in your three examples, the other

two are

up to you, but should be used to support your point of view.

·

Lastly, you will reflect on how these reflections change or impact your previous

perceptions of Christ and his work here on Earth.

·

Here are some questions to ponder

which may guide you in your analysis:

o

What was Jesus’ source of motivation in this action

?

Who was his action

addressed to/witnessing to (audience of and around him?)

o

Is this an isolated case in the Bible, if not, what do other instances say about His

actions? Are they consistent?

o

How does the world view this action? How do you know?

o

Which of these frameworks you are analyzing fits in this situation?

o

How do the Biblic

al Themes inform this action?

o

How has your thinking been reinforced, challenged, or shifted based on this

analysis? What does that mean?

Paper Format:

·

Your paper should be

at least

3

pages in length

written in

essay format

and

consistent with APA formatting.

Please do NOT

just copy/paste

and answer

questions

synthesize your thoughts.

Business Ethics Updated: Fall 2020

Page 1 of 2

Reflective Essay Project #3 – Jesus & Greatest Good

Personal Reflection / Utilitarianism & Christianity

Purpose: Understanding the Bible and how it fits or counters culture is critical to being

a strong apologist for what you believe. This essay will have you synthesize two of the

world’s most prevalent philosophies regarding human life and treatment of others. As a

reminder:

Deontological ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong

based on a moral code. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration.

... In the other hand, Utilitarian ethics state that a course of action should be taken by

considering the most positive outcome for the greatest good.

Process:

 After reading Chapter 9 & 10 and researching Deontological Ethics, you will compare

and contrast these philosophies to Jesus’ actions.

 Find three examples and determine whether Jesus was acting out of these philosophies,

or how you may be able to bridge the gap with someone who believes this way to better

understand Jesus Motivations.

 You MUST address, Jesus dying on the cross in your three examples, the other two are

up to you, but should be used to support your point of view.

 Lastly, you will reflect on how these reflections change or impact your previous

perceptions of Christ and his work here on Earth.

 Here are some questions to ponder which may guide you in your analysis:

o What was Jesus’ source of motivation in this action? Who was his action

addressed to/witnessing to (audience of and around him?)

o Is this an isolated case in the Bible, if not, what do other instances say about His

actions? Are they consistent?

o How does the world view this action? How do you know?

o Which of these frameworks you are analyzing fits in this situation?

o How do the Biblical Themes inform this action?

o How has your thinking been reinforced, challenged, or shifted based on this

analysis? What does that mean?

Paper Format:

 Your paper should be at least 3 pages in length written in essay format and

consistent with APA formatting. Please do NOT just copy/paste and answer

questions – synthesize your thoughts.