Elder Abuse in ethics nursing dilemma
kofi2315\
Ethics--RubricforEthicsFinalPaper1.docxRubric for the Ethics Final Paper:
|
Criteria |
Level 4 3 points |
Level 3 2 points |
Level 2 1 point |
Level 1 0 points |
|
|
Introduction Theme/Objective |
Clearly and effectively communicates an introduction of the theme/objective of the ethics topic |
Effectively communicates an introduction of the theme/objective of the ethics topic but questions remain |
Does not effectively communicate an introduction of the theme/objective of the ethics topic |
Misses point completely in introduction of the theme/objective of the ethics topic |
/
|
|
Supporting Details |
Each detail supports or tells more about the topic and has follow up sentences which provide additional support |
Some of the details support the main idea/topic, but some do not |
The details do not support the main idea/topic OR there are not enough details |
There are no substantiating support for the main idea/topic |
/
|
|
Relevance: Why is this an ethical dilemma in today’s society? |
Very strong appropriate interpretation of data and relevant to the topic |
Largely appropriate interpretation of data and relevant to topic |
May contain some misinterpretation and/or irrelevant material |
Limited interpretation and relevance of topic |
/
|
|
Ethical analysis: application and discussion of ethical principles, theories, laws, and standards of nursing practice |
Ethical principles, theories, laws, and standards of nursing practice are clearly and effectively defined and applied to the topic |
Ethical principles, theories, laws, and standards of nursing practice are defined and applied to the topic, but clarity or thoroughness are lacking |
Ethical principles, theories, laws, and standards of nursing practice are superficially mentioned or inadequately applied to the topic |
Ethical principles, theories, laws, and standards of nursing practice are incorrectly defined or incorrectly applied to the topic |
/ |
|
Understanding of Topic as Ethical Dilemma for Nursing |
Addresses ethical issues in good detail, if appropriate |
Addresses ethical issues adequately, if appropriately
|
Does not address ethical issues adequately, if appropriate |
Ethical issues not appropriately or clearly addressed, if appropriate |
/
|
|
Personal Professional Response to the Issue
|
Clearly and effectively presents one’s personal PROFESSIONAL response to the issue |
Presents one’s personal PROFESSIONAL response to the issue, but clarity is lacking |
Presents one’s personal response to the issue, but emphasizes non-professional experiences |
Fails to make a connection between the writer and the topic presented |
/ |
|
Conclusion: Reflection of What You Learned Reflection |
Good summary, clearly articulated |
Summarized and adequately articulated |
Incomplete summary/superficially articulated |
Not a summary/poorly articulated |
/ |
|
Clarity and Organization
Headings utilized
|
Headings utilized, paper clear/concise/organized |
Headings not utilized, paper clear/concise/organized |
No Headings, paper unclear/ not concise/disorganized |
Lack of organization obscures meaning or you have not corrected feedback given in prior assignments |
/ |
|
Spelling and Grammar |
No spelling or grammatical errors.
|
Less than 3 spelling or grammatical errors |
Less than 7 spelling or grammatical errors.
|
More than 7 spelling or grammatical errors, errors obscure meaning, or a failure to correct errors discussed in class or feedback from previous assignments |
/
|
|
APA format |
No APA 7th edition errors |
Less than 3 incidents of APA errors |
Less than 7 incidents of APA errors |
More than 7 incidents of APA errors or failure to correct errors discussed in class or feedback from previous assignments |
/ |
|
Correct Length: 6 ½-7 ½ pages of text, PLUS title page and references
|
yes |
|
|
no |
/ |
|
Minimum of 3 professional nursing references, 5 years old or less
|
yes |
|
|
no |
/ |
|
Total |
36 |
|
|
|
/ |
