Week 2 Assignment 2021 Class 1
Ethical Reflections Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|||
|
Overview of Issue |
40 to >36.0 pts |
36 to >33.0 pts |
33 to >0.0 pts |
0 pts |
40 pts |
|
|
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
|
|
Describe an event that has occurred in practice in which an error was made, an ethical dilemma arose, or a breakdown in team work, collaboration, and communication among the healthcare team negatively impacted a patient’s care or health outcome. |
Partially describes an event that has occurred in practice in which an error was made, an ethical dilemma arose, or a breakdown in team work, collaboration, and communication among the healthcare team negatively impacted a patient’s care or health outcome. Does not clearly provide all elements of the situation. |
Vaguely describes an event that has occurred in practice in which an error was made, an ethical dilemma arose, or a breakdown in team work, collaboration, and communication among the healthcare team negatively impacted a patient’s care or health outcome. Few details are provided. |
|
|
|
Insight and Application |
30 to >27.0 pts |
27 to >24.0 pts |
24 to >0.0 pts |
0 pts |
30 pts |
|
|
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
|
|
Explain the insights that resulted from this event. Illustrate how the details of this event could be used in a proactive manner to ensure that similar events are avoided in the future. Consider the ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses and your Biblical Worldview (BWV). |
Partially provides the insights that resulted from this event. Vaguely illustrates how the details of this event could be used in a proactive manner to ensure that similar events are avoided in the future. Application lacks insight from the Code or BWV. |
Poorly offers insights that resulted from this event. Does not illustrate how the details of this event could be used in a proactive manner to ensure that similar events are avoided in the future. No application of the Code or BWV. |
|
|
|
Formatting |
30 to >27.0 pts |
27 to >24.0 pts |
24 to >0.0 pts |
0 pts |
30 pts |
|
|
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
|
|
Required length (2 – 4 pages, excluding the title page and reference page), consistent use of current APA, effective grammar, writing is clear and thorough with evidence of critical thinking. Supports your position with evidence from 2 – 3 scholarly sources. |
Most elements are present but few errors are present (2 · 4 errors). Supports your position with evidence from 2 · 3 scholarly sources. |
Some elements are present but many errors are present (5 or more). Position not supported by the literature or less than 1 scholarly source. |
|
|
|
Total Points: 100 |