Ethical Issue in Working Standard and Condition
ETHICAL REASONING RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
(4) Exceeds Expectations |
(3) Meets Expectations |
(2) Approaches Expectations |
(1) Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
Identifies Ethical Dilemma |
Clearly and objectively details the circumstances that created the ethical problem; identifies the central ethical dilemma and its importance. |
Provides an adequate explanation of the circumstances that created the ethical problem; identifies the central ethical dilemma. |
Leaves out some important details when explaining the circumstances that led to the ethical problem; describes the central ethical dilemma in vague terms. |
Fails to explain the factors that led to the ethical problem and misinterprets the core ethical dilemma. |
|
Considers Stakeholders |
Identifies and prioritizes the interests of all relevant stakeholders.
|
Identifies the interests of most of the relevant stakeholders. |
Identifies and prioritizes the interests of a few relevant stakeholders. |
Fails to identify any of the relevant stakeholders or interests. |
|
Analyzes Ethical Alternatives |
Identifies a number of alternatives and predicts their associated consequences in detail. |
Identifies at least two alternatives and predicts their associated consequences in detail.
|
Identifies only one ethical approach to the ethical dilemma and its associated consequence. |
Fails to provide adequate explanation of an ethical approach to the issue. |
|
Chooses an Action and Articulates a Plan of Implementation |
Chooses an action that creatively addresses the ethical problem and articulates a skillful plan for implementing it. |
Chooses an appropriate action for addressing the ethical problem and articulates a practical plan for implementing it. |
Chooses an action that does not directly address the ethical problem and articulates an impractical plan for implementing it. |
Does not identify and/or explain appropriate decision for a course of action.
|