ETHICAL NEWS
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 1 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
BUSN Graduate Writing Rubric Course: MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021
Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did Not Attempt
Thesis
Introduction
Argument and Synthesis
of Knowledge
10 points
Student develops a focused
and sophisticated research
question or thesis that
enhances the scholarly
discussion of questions and
ideas that are important to
scholars in the discipline.
8.5 points
Student develops a focused
and sophisticated research
question or thesis, engaging
with the questions and ideas
of the field.
7.5 points
Student develops a research
question that is clear, but not
focused or sophisticated, and
may or may not engage with
questions and ideas
important in the discipline.
6.5 points
Student develops a research
question that is unclear or
confused, or does not at all
engage with the questions
and ideas important to
scholars in the discipline.
0 points
Did not attempt.
10 points
The writing provides an
exceptional roadmap for the
essay. In addition, the
introduction includes meets
all of the following criteria: • The introduction
contextualizes the thesis
statement by referring to
larger issues in the discipline.
• The introduction provides
rationale for pursuing the
thesis by demonstrating a
research need or question.
• The introduction
articulates how the paper
will address the key question
or issue being studied.
• The introduction refers to
relevant, appropriate
scholarly literature.
8.5 points
The writing provides a clear
roadmap for the essay. In
addition, the introduction
includes meets at least 3 of the following criteria:
• The introduction
contextualizes the thesis
statement by referring to
larger issues in the discipline.
• The introduction provides
rationale for pursuing the
thesis by demonstrating a
research need or question.
• The introduction
articulates how the paper
will address the key question
or issue being studied.
• The introduction refers to
relevant, appropriate
scholarly literature.
7.5 points
The writing provides a basic
roadmap for the essay. In
addition, the introduction
includes meets at least 2 of the following criteria:
• The introduction
contextualizes the thesis
statement by referring to
larger issues in the discipline.
• The introduction provides
rationale for pursuing the
thesis by demonstrating a
research need or question.
• The introduction
articulates how the paper
will address the key question
or issue being studied.
• The introduction refers to
relevant, appropriate
scholarly literature.
6.5 points
The writing provides an
incomplete roadmap for the
essay. In addition, the
introduction includes meets
fewer than 2 of the following criteria:
• The introduction
contextualizes the thesis
statement by referring to
larger issues in the discipline.
• The introduction provides
rationale for pursuing the
thesis by demonstrating a
research need or question.
• The introduction
articulates how the paper
will address the key question
or issue being studied.
• The introduction refers to
relevant, appropriate
scholarly literature.
0 points
Did not attempt.
20 points
The argument builds logically
upon the thesis with
research-based, discipline-
appropriate supporting facts,
evidence, and/or data.
Student clearly describes
major methodologies and
practices of the field and
implements them in creative
and innovative ways.
The writing demonstrates
the ability to interpret,
analyze, and synthesize
information to advance the
argument.
17 points
Minor gaps in logic and
argument may appear.
Supporting facts, evidence,
and/or data are evident.
Student describes major
methodologies and practices
of the field accurately, uses
them appropriately in the
project.
The writing demonstrates
the ability to interpret and
analyze information to
support the argument.
15 points
Logical arguments may be
one-sided, or incomplete, or
may be based on inadequate
sources.
Student describes major
methodologies and/or
practices of the field, but
may have some omissions or
problems in implementation
(such as using an adequate
methodology, rather than an
exemplary one).
The writing demonstrates
the ability to summarize
information that supports
the argument.
13 points
Fuzzy logic may be evident
and adequate supporting
evidence is lacking.
Student's work does not
accurately or thoroughly
describe the major
methodologies and practices
of the field, may implement
them inappropriately.
The writing demonstrates
the ability to refer to
external information with
limited ability to support the
argument.
0 points
Did not attempt.
20 points
Student communicates,
organizes and synthesizes
complex and contradictory
17 points
Student clearly and
effectively communicates,
organizes and synthesizes
15 points
Student communicates
results from various sources,
but the information is not
13 points
Student does not adequately
communicate, organize
and/or synthesize
0 points
Did not attempt.
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 2 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
Sources and Support
Organization
Style
Grammar and
Mechanics
information from multiple
sources to advance
knowledge in the discipline
at a professional level.
Student accurately quotes,
paraphrases, and cites
information in ways that are
true to the original context
with no errors.
complex and contradictory
information from multiple
sources to advance
knowledge in the discipline.
Student quotes, paraphrases
and cites information
correctly and consistently,
using information in ways
that are true to the original
context, with minimal errors.
clearly and effectively
communicated or does not
advance knowledge in the
discipline.
Student quotes, paraphrases
and cites information mostly
correctly and consistently, in
ways that are largely true to
the original context.
information from sources
and/or does not advance
knowledge in the discipline.
Student quotes, paraphrases
and cites information but
may have many errors or use
the information out of
context.
10 points
The writing flows smoothly
and logically from a well-
defined thesis. There is a coherence in each sentence
and paragraph that relates
clearly to the controlling idea
using appropriate examples.
The flow of information
demonstrates logical
reasoning without jumps or
shifts. The writing contains a
thorough introduction, body
sections, conclusion, and
smooth transitions.
8.5 points
The writing is organized
logically and flows well.
Paragraphs are organized to fit the type of essay being
written. The writing
discusses each controlling
idea using appropriate
examples. The flow of
information demonstrates
logical reasoning with minor
jumps or shifts. The writing
contains an appropriate
introduction, body sections,
conclusion, and transitions.
7.5 points
The writing demonstrates
rudimentary organization
and logical structure, but ideas may be more fully
developed and supported by
more appropriate evidence.
Paragraphs are somewhat
organized to fit the type of
essay being written. The
writing discusses the
controlling idea using
prescribed resources or
examples. The writing
contains a basic introduction
and body sections, but may
be missing a conclusion.
There may be repetition of
thought or ideas. The
coherence at times is choppy
or flat.
6.5 points
The writing is noticeably
lacking in organization.
Paragraphs are somewhat organized, at least by shape,
to fit the type of essay being
written. However, the
writing lacks discussion of
the proposed controlling
idea. There may be repetition
of thought or ideas.
The writing contains some
elements of the introduction
and body sections, but may
be missing a conclusion.
Transitions are not evident.
0 points
Did not attempt.
10 points
The writing engages the
reader through an original
prose style appropriate to
the subject. Language is
precise and uses terminology
appropriate to the discipline.
All sentences are solid and
reflect mature writing.
Variety in sentence structure
contributes to the logical
flow and enhances
readability. Active voice and
passive voice are used
appropriately for the subject
matter.
8.5 points
The writing keeps the
reader’s attention through a
carefully crafted prose style.
Language chosen is
appropriate to the discipline,
but may have minor errors in
using terminology. Sentences
are strong in thought
construct. Variety in
sentence structure
contributes to the logical
flow. Active voice and
passive voice are typically
used appropriately for the
subject matter.
7.5 points
The writing is clear but could
be expressed in a
terminology more
appropriate to the subject.
Sentences are sometimes
nonstandard or included
fragments/run-ons. There is
limited use of sentence
variety for logical flow.
Active voice and passive
voice are used inconsistently.
6.5 points
The writing lacks clarity and
is sometimes confusing. The
language chosen is not
appropriate to the subject
nor the assignment.
Sentences are often
nonstandard and included
fragments and run-ons.
There is no evidence of
sentence variety used for
logical flow. Active voice and
passive voice are used
inconsistently.
0 points
Did not attempt.
10 points
The writing is free of
proofreading errors. The
writing contains sentences
that are always complete and
grammatically correct, and free of confusion and
ambiguity.
8.5 points
The writing may exhibit a
few minor errors in
proofreading, but they do
not impair the flow of the
reading. The writing contains sentences that are complete
or which imply unstated
connections and/or
conclusions.
7.5 points
The writing could benefit
from additional proofreading,
as some errors impede the
flow of the reading. The
writing contains some grammatical errors easily
corrected. Additional
proofreading would help
eliminate errors.
6.5 points
The writing exhibits
substantial errors in
proofreading. The writing is
confusing and ambiguous
owing to substantial errors of grammar and syntax.
There is no evidence of
proofreading, editing, or
rewriting.
0 points
Did not attempt.
10 points
Student provides a high-
8.5 points
Assignment presents an
7.5 points
Appearance of final
6.5 points
Appearance of the final
0 points
Did not attempt.
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 3 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
Total
Overall Score
Formatting caliber, correctly formatted
assignment in the assigned
citation style. All citations in
the text and in the
references are accurately
cited in the appropriate
style.
above-average use of
formatting skills with few
errors in citation style.
Most citations in the text
and in the references are
accurately cited in the
appropriate style.
assignment demonstrates
the student's limited ability
to use appropriate citation
style formatting.
Some citations in the text
and in the references are
accurately cited in the
appropriate style.
assignment is distracting.
The number of citation style
formatting errors impedes
easy reading.
Few citations in the text and
in the references are
accurately cited in the
appropriate style.
Exemplary 90 points minimum
Accomplished 80 points minimum
Developing 70 points minimum
Beginning 60 points minimum
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 4 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 5 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 6 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 7 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 8 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 9 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 10 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 11 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 12 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 13 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 14 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704
7/29/21, 7:56 PMAssignment #4 (Week 6): Ethical News Story and Video - MGMT615 B002 Summer 2021 - APEI
Page 15 of 15https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=115236&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=37704