Case Study 4
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
49
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour
in Public Management
Armenia ANDRONICEANU1
Abstract: The role of ethical behaviour in public management is crucial for the
public organizations’ results and for the citizens’ satisfaction. This idea is already
demonstrated by several studies and the practitioners share it. There are limited knowledge
about how the newly emerged politico-administrative dichotomy in the Balkans has
influenced the formation of ethical behaviour along the management process and how this
should be updated, taking into account that it is permanently influenced by regional
cultures, by public managers and politicians. The main objectives of this paper are: (1) to
identify some features of the human resources behaviour during the management process;
(2) to underline the main reasons for unethical behaviour, (3) to identify some
recommendations for creating and maintaining an ethically-oriented behaviour. The
research methodology was based on questionnaire and included forty persons from the
central government level. The paper concludes with some recommendations for improving
the ethical behaviour of the human resources involved in the public management process at
the central Romanian government.
Keywords: ethics; human resources; public management
JEL: J21; J24; D23. Introduction
The research starts from the assumption that decisions and behaviours are
influenced by values. People often have different values and ways of behaving.
Although these different values make people behave differently, yet they should
work together in organizations that have common values and ethical behaviour. A key role in this adaptation process have public managers. They have to set up the
values and to follow them in the management process. It is necessary for the public
managers to foster common value systems within their structures, if they want
decisions and human behaviours to be consistent with their objectives. This
consistency is possible if the organizations' values are known and agreed by every
employee. It should be a sort of “soft” partnership based on ethical values.
(Burlacu, 2011).
The word "ethics" is often in the news nowadays. Ethics is a philosophical
term derived from the Greek word "ethos" meaning character or custom (Calciu,
1 Professor PhD, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Administration and
Public Management, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected]
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
50
2009). This definition is linked with effective leadership in organizations.
(Bovaird, Hughes, 1995).
Certain organizations will commit themselves to this philosophy through a
formal pronouncement of a Code of Ethics or Standards of Conduct. Other private
organizations, however, will be concerned with aspects of ethics of greater
specificity, usefulness, and consistency. Formally defined, ethical behaviour is
morally accepted as "good" and "right" as opposed to "bad" or "wrong" in a
particular setting (Androniceanu, Abaluta, 2008). Organizations face a variety of
changes and challenges that will have a profound impact on organizational
dynamics and performance (Halachmi, 1995). A long-standing tradition of ethical
behaviour is based on the principles of honesty, integrity and trustworthiness.
The ethical climate of an organization is composed by a set of beliefs about
what correct behaviour is and how ethical issues will be handled. This climate sets
the tone for decision making at all levels and in all circumstances (Androniceanu,
2011). Some of the factors and variables presented below were involved in the
survey in order to emphasize the fact that ethical behaviour of the human resources
is strongly influenced by ethical organizational environment which is based on
ethical core values of each person involved in the management process. The main
attributes included in the survey are the following: personal self-interest; public
interest; operating efficiency; individual friendships; team interests; social
responsibility; personal morality; rules and standards of procedure; laws and
professional codes.
Standards for what constitutes ethical behaviour lie in a "grey area" where
clear-cut right-versus-wrong answers may not always exist. As a result, unethical
behaviour is sometimes imposed on public organizations by the formal
environment (Popescu, R.I., 2008). However, ethical behaviour is in many cases
strongly influenced by values in which public managers and the politicians believe.
Their personal behaviour gives the others possibility to make a comparison
between what the public managers and the politicians are saying about core ethical
values of the public organization and how they apply these values in the
management process. The research survey demonstrates that there are enough
differences between these two dimensions. The differences are influences by
several factors and variables. Identifying and knowing the content and the causes
of these factors and variables may lead to the identification of ways to improve the
ethical behaviour of human resources who are working in a public organization.
The effective management of ethical issues requires that public
organizations ensure that their public managers, politicians and the civil servants
know which are the ethical values - and how to deal with ethical issues in their
everyday work (Moldoveanu, Sabie, 2009).
1. Empirical survey on specific ethical values and ethical behaviour of public managers, civil servants and politicians
It is now necessary for the Romanian public managers and for the
politicians to reconsider their fundamental values and beliefs, to see which
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
51
represent now deviates from what we think we set out to be, and what we would
like public employees to see us to be. Ethical behaviour is acknowledged as a
necessity in modern governments.
There are some recent research studies conducted by different scholars. In
the period 15-20 February 2006, one Romanian academic group working inside the
International Research Centre for Public Management from the Bucharest
University of Economic Studies initiated an empirical survey on the ethical
behaviour in the Centre of the Romanian Government (CRG). We set up this
survey having the main objectives to know what the people understand by ethical
values and ethical behaviour and to identify the main reasons for unethical
behaviour occurrence in the CRG. Based on this, we made some recommendations
for improving ethical behaviour, taking into account the general principles for
managing ethics in the public sector. The survey was replicated in 2012 and the
current paper includes the main findings. The purpose of the survey was to identify
the main changes of human resources ethical behaviour. The results have been used
afterwards for making recommendation regarding the appropriate essential ethical
values and the needed changes for the Romanian public administration and
especially for the central government body.
The main dimensions of ethical behaviour considered and the meaning of
each of them are the following:
Utilitarian view of ethics — greatest good to the greatest number of people;
Individualist view of ethics — primary commitment to one’s long-term self-interests;
Moral-rights view of ethics — respects and protects the fundamental rights of all people;
Justice view of ethics — fair and impartial treatment of people according to legal rules and standards.
Forty persons from the CRG have answered to the questionnaire,
conceived having in mind the identification of the ethical profile of the people at
this level of the Romanian public administration. The sample consisted of
40 people including 32 men and 8 women. The structure by age group was:
23-30 years – 10%; 31-40 years – 20%; 41-50 years – 40%; over 50 years – 30%.
Structure grouped by level of education and the last graduate school was the
following: graduate studies - 85%, post graduate studies – 10% and meanwhile
college studies - 5%. Regarding the experience in public administration it is
notable that most participants (55%) have 15 years of experience in central public
administration, followed by other 20% represented by people with an experience
between 5 and 14 years. The rest of them (25%) have less than 4 years experience
(between 1- 4 years).
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
52
41-50
years
40%
over 50
years
30% 31-40
years
20%
23-30
years
10%
Figure 1. The sample structure by age
Figure 2 shows the group structure on both political and administrative
levels while figure 3 details the structure of the political group composed by
10 persons including 6 executive directors and 4 counsellors or advisors of the
ministers.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Political Level
Administrative Level
Figure 2. Sample structure on administrative and political levels
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Cabinet directors
Councellors
Figure 3. The specific structure of the political level
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
53
Figure no. 4 presents the structure of the group from the administrative
level: 30 persons -7 executive directors, 10 head of functional departments, 10 civil
servants and 3 contracting people.
0
2
4
6
8
10
Executive Directors
Head of Departm ents
Civil servants
Contracting people
Figure 4. The structure of the administrative level
In our survey, we have considered the following three categories of values
as influencing the ethical behaviour of the human resources:
a) Personal values – family influences, religious values, standards, and needs;
b) Government values – supervisory behaviour, peer group norms and behaviour, policy statements and written rules;
c) Environment values – government laws and regulations, societal norms and values.
It is found (see Figure 5) that most of the people from the administrative
level which have been questioned feel a strong influence on their ethical behaviour
coming from the last two categories of values. On the opposite part is the opinion
of the people from the political level, who consider that their ethical behaviour is
influenced by other factors and variables from the first category plus their political
values.
The main specific values considered in our survey were: political self-
interest; individual friendships; team interest; social responsibility; personal
morality; rules and standards procedures; laws and professional codes. Concerning
the understanding of ethical values and behaviour through our survey, we
discovered that more then 80% of the investigated people do not know much about
the ethical values and behaviour.
Figure 5 shows the extent to which each specific value influences the
ethical behaviour of subjects during the management process: political self-interest
– 30%; individual friendships – 15%; team interests – 5%; social responsibility –
5%; personal morality – 10%; rules and standard procedures – 30%; laws and
professional codes – 5%.
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
54
Political self
interest; 30%
Individual
friendship; 15%
Team interest;
5%
Personal
morality; 10%
Rules and
procedures;
30%
Laws and
professional
codes
5%
Social
responsibility
5%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
P ol
it ic
al s el
f in
te re
st
In di
vi du
al f ri
en ds
hi p
T ea
m in
te re
st
P er
so na
l m or
al it y
R ul
es a
nd p
ro ce
du re
s
L aw
s an
d pr
of es
si on
al c od
es
So ci
al r es
po ns
ib ili
ty
Figure 5. Values that influence ethical behaviour
More than 80% of the people involved in the survey mentioned that their
ethical behaviour is strongly influenced by many other individual factors and
variables: personal perceptions, own belief, education, rules, administrative
procedures and their status in the central public administration (see figure 6). The
remaining respondents believe that their behaviour is influenced by their position
and status in the central government body.
Status at the
central level;
17%
Rules; 22%
Education;
18%
Admin.
procedures;
37%
Own belief;
3%
Personal
perception;
2%
Figure 6. The main factors and variables that influence the behaviour of the human
resources
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
55
All people from the political level considered the first and the second
factors as the most important in influencing their ethical behaviour. The rest of the
investigated people appreciated that their ethical values and the behaviour are
strongly influenced by the administrative procedures, which had the highest rank
followed by rules and education. Only 5% from the administrative level considered
that their ethical behaviour is influenced by their personal perceptions and beliefs.
As can be seen there is a strong difference between the political and the
administrative level from the perspective of ethical values. Nobody refer to the
clear system of ethical values for the people who are working at the level of the
government. More than 90% of the investigated people declared that they know the
ethical values and follow them in their daily activities because they understand how
important are in their relations with others and for the image of the institution they
are working for.
As demonstrated by our empirical research, people look at their leader and
say, ‘should I follow this person?’ One very important attribute is Integrity. When
the leader loses legitimacy, the entire basis of an effective body comes down –
fairness, equality and long lasting values. The proper governmental culture will
collapse, and that is something no public manager or politician can afford.
If one government is known to hold corrupt structures with bad image and
non-ethical behaviour of their politicians and public managers, no one would like
to co-operate with such government. In the longer run, citizens and the business
environment do not want to be associated with such structures. Once a government
or the public management representatives are regarded as corrupts, their level of
legitimacy declines.
The corollary is that, in a system where one government subverts the law,
it becomes much harder for other public organizations to operate “cleanly”. This is
why ethical behaviour and ethical leadership are a necessity. The experience proves
the fact that is a real need for public managers and politicians to set up clear ethical
values and build a sustainable and effective system of practices to implement them.
Following the results of our empirical study, credible leaders and
politicians challenge the process by experimenting and taking risks in their work as
a means to finding new and better ways of doing things. They inspire a shared
vision among employees by envisioning the future and enlisting others to bring
about that vision. They enable others to act by fostering collaboration and
strengthening others.
Nearly half of public managers involved in research are credible leaders
that encourage people by recognizing individual contributions and by celebrating
their accomplishments. That means an ethical behaviour based on ethical values
and morality. Most of the subjects considered that ethical behaviour is absolutely
necessary when leaders attempt to implement reforms that are transformational in
nature.
The survey pointed out that there are two categories of leadership
competences related with public managers and with politicians: one category called
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
56
“soft skills” and the second called “strong/technical skills”. It has been
demonstrated that there are some critical leadership competencies confirmed as
baseline for promoting ethical behaviour inside the centre of the government:
understanding the policies of other departments; understanding the particularities
of the ministries and their environment; building relationships and networks;
managing change; managing the public; managing the relationship with the media;
influencing, motivating, developing, retaining talent and creative human resources;
managing conflict and dealing with problems of employees.
According to the survey results, most of the public managers are focused
most of the time on their department activities only and therefore fail to identify the
necessary links with other departments for the success of their work. The survey highlights the fact that leaders both civil servants and politicians need to fully
understand how their departments: (1) fit into and support the larger government
policy process and (2) enable their jurisdiction/agency to serve stakeholders.
We can conclude that the ethical behaviours and the performance
expectations are strongly influenced by the leadership knowledge, skills, attitudes,
and individual abilities. Most of the investigated people mentioned that there is a
special internal code containing the main ethical values, but the problem is how to
create an internal mechanism for meeting them along the management process. The
code of ethics for the civil servants has been approved few years ago, but the effect
is minimal. The public managers and the civil servants are much more motivated to
follow the legal framework and the job description than to make an effort for
integrate the ethical values in their daily activities. Most of them said that if their
initiatives are legal, that means they are ethical too. Nobody explained them the
difference between rules, legal framework and ethical values and how could be
possible to integrate all of this in their daily ethical behaviour. The majority of our
respondents pointed out the lack of an internal mechanism with ethical standards
for public sector. They mentioned that respect ethical values remain at the
discretion of each employee which should comply with internal and regulatory
framework only. They know the obligations from the job descriptions, but most of
these documents are very similar. So most of them have the same rights and
obligations.
Concerning the political commitment for the ethical values it depends on
the politicians, Cabinet Directors and also the personal counsellors of the ministers.
Some of them, in a very empirically way, try to have an ethical behaviour, but not
all the time. They are politicians and feel public institutions like a temporary
placement of their political carrier. They are not very much interested to build a
consistent and effective commitment of ethics to reinforce ethical conduct of
people who are working in public institutions.
Related with the decision making process, the survey identified a poor
consultation between the politicians and the public managers. Usually, the dialogue
between the politicians, executive public managers and the civil servants at the
centre of the government is very poor. Most of the time the people working on the
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
57
administrative level are very much involved in the implementation process of
public policies not in the decision-making process. In this context the ethical values
are not enough part of the politician working life. They consider these subject like
secondary and because of that they are not interested for spending time in
designing a functional mechanism for ethical values. Research has shown that
people involved in the management process at the central government level have
different opinions about the ethical values. The people from the administrative
level are interested in having an ethical values system and they want to follow them
together with the representatives from the political levels while politicians prefer
not to have it. In conclusion, the people that were directly involved in management
process at the CRG level do not have a unitary and coherent vision on these ethical
values and behaviour. Based on the research results, in the next section of the paper
were proposed several recommendations for increasing the ethical behaviour at the
centre of the Romanian government.
2. Recommendations for increasing ethical behaviour at the centre of the Romanian government
One of the greatest challenges confronting any leader in this twenty first
century is bridging the gap between strategy and getting people to execute. Leaders
(politicians, executive public managers) direct people to focus on the right strategic
issues. Too often people cannot identify with a government’s strategy and likewise.
Sometimes leaders are disconnected from the realities that people must face within
the organization. If the leaders can properly bridge this gap (strategic vs.
organizational capacity), then they should be able to create value.
The decision making process at the centre of the government should be
based on a strong dialogue between leaders and their people. If the right people are
engaged, then everyone should be able to cut their way through the strategic jungle.
If leaders fail to engage people in strategic execution, then creating value through
leadership will be exceedingly difficult. Although it is true that most people are not
good strategic thinkers, it is also true that people want to contribute to a larger
purpose that only the leader can convey. Therefore, communication is at the
cornerstone of creating value through leadership. And given great communication,
leaders from the centre of the government can close the gap between strategy and
strategic execution.
Although governments have sometimes different cultural, political and
administrative expectations, they often face similar ethical challenges, and the
responses in their ethics management show common characteristics. The
participants to the management process at the central government level need to
have a point of reference in their approach. A consensus regarding the content of
the ethical values is needed. Leaders, politicians and public managers should be
open and flexible along the management process and to follow the same values,
rules and regulations. In the next paragraphs are presented some recommendations
for building an efficient system of ethical values in public institutions.
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
58
2.1. Training on the specific values concerning ethics and ethical behavior
The training programs should be designed to help participants to
understand ethical aspects of their work, their status and also the ethical aspects of
the decision making process inside the public institutions. It should help them to
know how to incorporate high ethical standards in their daily organizational life.
During the training program people should learn how to deal with ethical issues
under legal and political pressure. Professional socialization should contribute to
the development of them necessary judgment and skills enabling people to apply
ethical principles in concrete circumstances. The participants should learn how to
behave in order to get an impartial advice that can help the public managers and the
politicians to create an environment in which people are more willing to confront
and resolve ethical tensions and problems then to rise conflicts and dissatisfaction.
Guidance and internal consultation mechanisms should be set up and explained in
order to help the human resources to apply basic ethical standards in the workplace.
2.2. Setting up a special department in public institutions to monitor ethical values and behaviour
The name of this special team could be “moral quality circles” and can
work at the centre of the Romanian government as an independent body based on
the same principles like “management quality circles”.
2.3. Designing and implementing a special ethical accounting mechanism in public organizations
The internal mechanism should be based on the following values:
Respect for human dignity meaning to create culture that values employees, citizens, politicians; to produce safe public policies;
Respect for basic rights meaning to protect rights of employees, public managers, citizens, and communities; to avoid anything that threatening safety,
health, education, and living standards;
Respect for good public leadership meaning: to support social interest; to work inside the government and institutions to support and protect the public
interest.
Public leaders should be accountable for their actions to the public.
Accountability should focus both on compliance with rules and ethical principles -
and on the results achievement. Accountability mechanisms can be internal or can
be provided by civil society. Mechanisms promoting accountability can be
designed to provide adequate controls while allowing for appropriately flexible
management.
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
59
The main steps for creating such mechanism are:
o Clarifying the vision and mission statement, setting goals and objectives;
o Presenting the principles and designing the core ethical values and the ethical standards at the workplace;
o Disseminating, motivating and communicating the ethical standards and values;
o Building teams oriented on ethical values and results; o Measuring performance; o Developing human resources; o Increasing participative management; o Preparing for transition to the new public management model based on
ethical values and competitive leadership in public organizations.
2.4. Create a code of moral principles
That means to establish set standards of “good” and “bad” as opposed to
“right” and “wrong”. Public servants need to know what their rights and
obligations are in terms of exposing actual or suspected wrong doing within the
public service. These should include clear rules and procedures for politicians and
executive public managers to follow - and a formal chain of responsibility. Civil
servants and some of the politicians also should know their rights and obligations
related to ethical values.
2.5. Create an ethical role model
Following the experiences from other developed countries, usually top
public managers and the politicians serve as ethical role models. All public
managers and politicians can influence the ethical behaviour of people who work
for and with them. The practice rose that excessive pressure can foster unethical
behaviour. Because of that, public managers should be realistic in setting
performance goals for others (Ojo and Adebayo, 2012). They also must observe the
ethical values through their daily life inside the public organizations. In this way
they can become models for others around them.
2.6. Create a special codes of ethics for all people who are working for the
centre of the government and also for other public organizations
That means a formal statement of the centre of the government and also an
organization’s values and ethical principles regarding how to behave in situations
susceptible to the creation of ethical dilemmas. It should be reflected in the legal
framework too. The Public Management Committee and the OECD Council
recommended that the member countries have to take actions to ensure well-
ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behavior in Public Management
60
functioning institutions and systems for promoting ethical conduct in the public
service. This can be achieved by:
developing and regularly reviewing policies, procedures, practices and institutions influencing ethical conduct in the public service;
promoting government action to maintain high standards of conduct and counter corruption in the public sector;
incorporating the ethical dimension into management frameworks to ensure that management practices are consistent with the values and
principles of public service;
combining judiciously those aspects of ethics management systems based on ideals with those based on the respect of rules;
assessing the effects of public management reforms on public service ethical conduct;
using as a reference the Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Service to ensure high standards of ethical conduct.
The idea of this approach is to create a set of HR practices that work
together to identify, develop, and promote talented people through the compliance
with essential ethical values and leadership capacity.
Conclusions
As we can see in this paper, the absorption of the ethical values should
happen in different ways, depending on the environment and the organizational
culture and the particular characteristics of the human resources. A balance
between political and administrative level should exist. This balance is generated
by a system of ethical values and compliance mechanism in public institutions. An
effective leader is one who makes a demonstrable impact on one or more of the
ethical values presented in a positive way by influencing the behaviour and the
performance of the others. In the new era of rapid changes and knowledge-based
organizations, managerial work becomes increasingly a leadership task based on an
ethical behaviour. Leadership is the primary force behind successful change,
mainly because leaders empower human resources to act always by considering the
permanent common set of ethical values.
References
1. ANDRONICEANU, A. (2011). Transparency of the Romanian local public administration. Administration and Public Management Review, No. 17,
pp. 33-46.
2. ANDRONICEANU, A. ABALUTA, O. (2008). Leadership and Management in the Public Sector: Values, Standards and Competencies in Central and
Eastern Europe, NispaCEE Printing House Bratislava, Slovakia, pp. 35-48.
ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 20/2013
Ethical Values and the Human Resources Behaviour in Public Management
61
3. BOVAIRD, T., HUGHES R. (1995). Re-engineering Public Sector Organizations: A Case Study of Radical Change in a British Local Authority.
International Review of Administrative Sciences. 61: 355-372.
4. BURLACU, S. (2011). Le role des ONG pour la prise de conscience de l'importance des partenariats publics-prives dans l'economie sociale en Roumanie,
Administration and Public Management Review no. 17, pp. 120-129.
5. CALCIU, R. (2009). The Ethics of the Civil Servants in the European Union. Administration and Public Management Review, no.12, pp.174-182.
6. HALACHMI, A. (1995). Re-engineering and Public Management: Some Issues and Considerations. International Review of Administrative Sciences.
61(3) (September), pp.329-341.
7. MOLDOVEANU, G. SABIE, O. (2009). Leadership Vector of the Organizational Development. Administration and Public Management Review
no. 12, pp. 110-119.
8. OJO, B., ADEBAYO, M. (2012). A factor analytic approach to users performance evaluation of the state land registry, Theoretical and Empirical
Researches in Urban Management, Volume 7, Issue 4, November, pp. 72-82.
9. POPESCU R.I., (2008). The European Policy Regarding the Improvement of
the Urban Environment. Administration and Public Management Review,
no.10, pp.142-150.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.