Computer Ethics
WRITING ETHICS PAPERS: Scoring Rubric
Course: _________________ Semester/Year: _______________ Student: __________________
Assignment: ______________________ Evaluator: ________________________ Date: ______________
Objective |
Needs improvement |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Comments |
|
Students will be able to demonstrate effective communication skills and solid ethical reasoning:Writing ethics papers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose · Focus · Significance (shows an awareness of main ideas) · Assignment topic |
__ Objective not clearly stated, paper lacks central focus __ Lack of awareness of main ideas or wrong interpretation of main ideas __ Doesn’t write on topic |
__ Objective adequately stated paper has central focus __ Some awareness of main ideas ___Missing criteria |
__ Objective very clearly stated, paper has strong thesis __ Strong awareness of main ideas ___Meets all assignment criteria |
|
|
|
Organization · Structure · Coherence · Paragraphing (transitions f/one idea to next) · Audience · Introduction and Conclusion |
__ No clear structure or pattern __ Entire paper lacks clarity; story lacks coherence overall __ Lack of paragraph transitions ___Loses reader ___No clear Intro and/or Conclusion |
__ Adequate structure or pattern __ Paper is clear; and coherent overall _ Adequate paragraph transitions ___Guides reader ___ Introduction &/or Conclusion |
__ Clear structure or pattern __ Entire paper is very clear; story is very coherent __Excellent paragraph transitions __ Knows audience ___Strong Introduction & Conclusion |
|
|
|
Evidence · Accuracy (statements)· Support (opinions are adequately supported) · Documentation · Counterarguments · Ethical Analysis |
__ Inaccurate statements __ Lack of support for statements/opinions __ Sources are inadequate ___Missing counterarguments or presented but not fully analyzed ___Doesn't make use of ethical theories or minimally, incorrectly or unconvincingly uses them |
__ Most statements are accurate __ Adequate support for statements/opinions __ Most sources are identified and referenced appropriately in the body __Counterarguments presented __Uses ethical and social analysis and theories |
__ Statements are very accurate __ Strong support for statements/opinions __ All sources are identified and referenced appropriately in the body ___Counterarguments strongly presented and analyzed __Uses ethical and social analysis and theories convincingly. |
|
|
Mechanics· Sentence structure (grammar, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation) · Appearance (Paper, References) |
__ Many errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. Mechanics interfere with reader's understanding of the text __ Poor appearance of Paper, References |
__ Few errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. Minimal distraction. __ Acceptable appearance of Paper, References |
__ Excellent grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Clear mechanics. __ Excellent appearance of Paper, References |
|
|
Comments:
1