global pespective

Hoyos 4

How have guerrillas impacted the security dynamic in the globe?

Introduction:

· Issue: The issue of guerrillas all over the world have been in mouth of many individuals, all over the world especially in South American and African countries, where it has been a big debate whether if the guerrillas have good intentions of not.

· Global significance: Guerrillas have been relevant for centuries and they have even affected countries like the US, now days there are many active guerrillas in South America, Central America, Africa, Middle East, etc. And there are many POV’s relating this topic.

· Thesis Statement: While some argue that guerrillas have good intentions and they just want to fight against corruption, others argue that guerrillas are just as corrupt as the governments, and they just cause chaos with their ideologies.

Preview of main points:

· The problem is still an issue today and is affecting millions of individuals all over the globe.

· Have an extreme impact on low-income families.

· An important aspect that we must know is that often guerrillas are formatted when governments especially in LIC’s are very corrupt, and they have vastly different viewpoints, also guerrillas' ideologies are often extremist and their purpose is to control the government with their ideologies, such as communism, fascism, etc.

· Overview of problem: the guerrillas have affected the security of different countries, or they are just trying to help the minorities against corruption.

· Source: https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/andes/rebel-playing-field-colombian-guerrillas-venezuelan-border ( proves that is an actual issue).

· Key terms:

Rebels: rise in opposition or armed resistance to an established government or ruler.

Guerrilla: a member of a small independent group taking part in irregular fighting, typically against larger regular forces.

First point of view/perspective: (pro guerrillas)

The article explores the EZLN’s motivations for their conflict with the Mexican government, emphasizing their fight against corruption and inequality towards indigenous people. It relies on credible sources, including EZLN leaders, but shows bias by justifying EZLN actions without fully discussing civilian impacts. Despite this, it offers insights into guerrilla movements’ reasons for challenging governments, aligning with the user’s interest in understanding different perspectives on the issue. The source argues that the EZLN’s conflict with the Mexican government stems from their opposition to corruption and inequality, especially regarding indigenous communities. It highlights the EZLN’s portrayal of themselves as defenders of people’s rights, supported by evidence from EZLN leaders and government sources. However, it lacks a balanced discussion of civilian impacts and potential drawbacks of EZLN actions, despite offering valuable insights into guerrilla movements’ motivations. The argument’s significance lies in illuminating the EZLN’s motivations and justifications for their conflict with the Mexican government, highlighting societal issues fueling guerrilla movements. Understanding these motives is vital for addressing underlying grievances and promoting peace and equality. However, the lack of discussion on civilian impacts limits the argument’s depth, though it still contributes valuable insights to the discourse on guerrilla movements. The source presents a compelling exploration of the EZLN’s motivations for their conflict with the Mexican government, drawing on credible sources to enhance its validity. It effectively delves into the group’s opposition to corruption and inequality, offering valuable insights into their perspective. However, the arguments show bias by supporting and lack balance in considering alternative viewpoints. Additionally, the limited discussion on civilian impacts weaknesses the argument. Despite these weaknesses, the source contributes valuable insights to the discourse on guerrilla movements. Addressing bias and providing a more balanced analysis would enhance the argument’s quality and objectivity.

· Second point of view/perspective (con guerrilla)

The NPR article by Jhon Otis discusses violence between Venezuelan forces and Colombian guerrillas in Apure, Venezuela. Otis argues that the conflict stemmed from guerrilla faction challenging Venezuelan control over cocaine trade, leading to clashes and civilian displacement. He suggests that while historical ties exist, the guerrillas are motivated more by illegal activities than ideological goals. Otis maintains a balanced viewpoint, drawing on credible sources like Jeremy McDermott and Tomas Gunipa to provide insight into the situation. Otis supports this with evidence from the violence and mentions achieving a ceasefire after resolving drug trade disputes. The article is significant as it reveals the drivers of violence between Venezuelan forces and Colombian guerrillas in Apure. By emphasizing the guerrillas’ challenge to Venezuelan control over the cocaine trade and their involvement in illegal activities, the argument highlights the conflict's complex dynamics. Otis also suggests a potential resolution to this issue. Overall, the argument offers insights into conflict’s root causes and pathways for promoting peace in the region. The article has many strengths such as having a balanced viewpoint, supported by evidence, and a good analysis. However, it lacks depth in exploring the conflicts complexities and the borderers' factors. This perspective shows that guerrillas do not want equality or fight against corruption, and they are involved in illegal activities, while the other perspective support the guerrillas saying that they fight for the rights, and they fight against corrupt governments.

· Conclusion:

My viewpoint is that if guerrillas maintain their basic ideologies to fight against corruption and inequality is good but if they approach to it in a peaceful way, but if the government is a dictatorship and they are not allowing any talks, is understandable to have an armed conflict, on the other hand most of guerrillas always go to the wrong path and they involve in many illegal activities and there is when I disagree and many other individuals do too, because they star causing more damage than good.

· Citations:

Zapatista National Liberation Army.” Encyclopoedia Britannica, Encyclopoedia Britannica, inc., 23 Feb. 2024. https://www.britannica.com/topic/guerrilla-warfare

Otis, John. “Behind the Violence between Venezuelan Forces and Colombian Guerillas.” NPR, NPR, 11 June 2021. https://www.npr.org/2021/06/11/1005670674/behind-the-violence-between-venezuelan-forces-and-colombian-guerillas

“A Rebel Playing Field: Colombian Guerrillas on the Venezuelan Border.” Crisis Group, 29 Apr. 2021, www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/andes/rebel-playing-field-colombian-guerrillas-venezuelan-border.