Response essay about Korea music
2-3 pages. 12-pt font, double spaced.
Killick, in his article for the Nov. 15 class, discusses ‘official’ and ‘unofficial’ streams of Korean traditional music practice in contemporary South Korea. One is the realm of state canonization of musical practice, which has involved, for the most part, making music resistant to change, and expunging blatantly modern content from the repertoire. The ‘unofficial’ tradition may be thought of as more flexible and responsive to the conditions of South Korean life. Referring to this article and the Nov. 15 lecture, notes, and listening examples, describe the motives of each. Pay particular attention to the different place of improvisationand personal style in each, and demonstrate the significance of these differences. What is the outcome of a fixed version of 'tradition' like that of the state? What paradoxes does this attitude towards the past produce?
The listening examples, by the way, are all versions of the "Ballad of the Entertainer." One example is of the 'official' tradition, a performance by the National Gugak (National Music) Center. The other two examples are colloquial versions of the song as performed by Kim Sundeok and Yun Sunman, which are rife with modern content but intensely traditional in mode of performance.
You may cite Killick as (Author: page number [Killick: 809]), but provide full citations for other sources. Late work will not be accepted.