Essay_2_Thesis_Outline_Grading_Rubric.docx
ENGL 101
|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
|
Points Earned
|
|
|
Good/Excellent
|
Fair/Competent
|
Deficient
|
|
|
Development
|
8 to 10 points
Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Content is persuasive and comprehensive. Content and purpose of the writing is clear. Thesis has a strong ethical argument claim. The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic. Required supportive information is strong and addresses writing focus.
|
5 to 7 points
Major points are addressed, but clarity or support is limited. Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive. Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity). The thesis could be stronger for an ethical argument. Required supportive information needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.
|
0 to 4 points
Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported. The content is missing essentials. The content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity. Required supportive information is missing.
|
|
|
Format: Current MLA/APA/ Turabian Paper Requirements
|
4 to 5 points
Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines. Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.
|
2 to 3 points
Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected. Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.
|
0 to 1 points
Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting. Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.
|
|
|
Total
|
/15
|
|
Instructor’s Comments:
|
Essay 2 Thesis/Outline Grading Rubric