Essay 2 ENG
Annotated Bibliography and Synthesis
Topic: Cloud Computing and Adaptive Cybersecurity
Overview
|
Goal: The goal of an annotated bibliography is to help you think about your sources and their value. The Online Writing Lab at Purdue sums it up nicely (emphasis added): Writing an annotated bibliography is excellent preparation for a research project. Just collecting sources for a bibliography is useful, but when you have to write annotations for each source, you're forced to read each source more carefully. You begin to read more critically instead of just collecting information…To help you formulate a thesis: Every good research paper is an argument. The purpose of research is to state and support a thesis. So a very important part of research is developing a thesis that is debatable, interesting, and current. Writing an annotated bibliography can help you gain a good perspective on what is being said about your topic. By reading and responding to a variety of sources on a topic, you'll start to see what the issues are, what people are arguing about, and you'll then be able to develop your own point of view (Purdue OWL). We’ve talked this semester about the importance of creating knowledge, rather than just repeating/transcribing other people’s knowledge. In order to know where/when/how you can add original ideas, it is important to know what has been said before you. The annotated bibliography will help with that.
"Purdue OWL." Purdue OWL: Annotated Bibliographies. OWL at Purdue, n.d. Web. 29 May 2017. |
Annotation Types and Purposes
|
An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation. Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following. · Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is. For more help, see our handout on paraphrasing sources. · Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? For more help, see our handouts on evaluating resources. · Reflect: Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? "Purdue OWL." Purdue OWL: Annotated Bibliographies. OWL at Purdue, n.d. Web. 29 May 2017. |
Example of Annotation and Citation (MLA)
|
An example, taken from OWL@Purdue: Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1995. Print. Lamott's book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott's book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one's own internal critic. In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun. Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1 address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students' own drafting and revising processes. Some of the writing exercises would also be appropriate for generating classroom writing exercises. Students should find Lamott's style both engaging and enjoyable. |
Annotated Bibliography Instructions Pt 1
|
Nuts and Bolts: For each of your 7 (minimum) sources (Five Scholarly, Two Non-scholarly), please provide 200-250 word annotations which describe, briefly: · the relevant content of the source · what it contributes to the conversation/discourse of your topic · in what way it is valuable or useful for you in your project. · Additionally, you should discuss what makes this source, in your eyes, credible (and, for your scholarly sources, how you know it is scholarly).
Generally, there are 3 types of annotations used – summative (this is what it says), evaluative (this is how useful it is), and reflective (this is what I used it for). Your annotations for this assignment should focus on a combination of summative and reflective. You may use either MLA or APA citation style (pick one and be consistent). The format should be as follows: A complete bibliographical citation followed by a single-spaced and thorough annotation. |
Annotated Bibliography Instructions Pt 2 -- Synthesis
Following the Annotated Bibliography, you will compose a brief synthesis document which utilizes a minimum of 5 of your sources. In this document, you are looking to make connections between your sources. Whereas your Pt. 1 annotations show what each source contributes to the discourse on its own, this Pt. 2 is meant for you to highlight what these sources contribute collectively, when viewed together. You should not only point out important moments of overlap and gaps between sources, but also discuss the significance/importance of those moments.
The goal of this document is to identify important and relevant moments of OVERLAP and GAP amongst the research sources you've read. It should be written as a mini-essay, with full paragraphs and a conclusion. You should use synthesis (using what is known information from 2 or more sources and combining it to conclude something new) to:
· identify what are questions/answers that seem consistent across the discourse, as well as what are some unanswered/unasked questions in the discourse
· attempt to find an "entry point" into the conversation -- what can YOU contribute, having now caught yourself up on he scholarly conversation.
· put multiple sources in conversation with one another (at least two per paragraph)
· discuss similarities (overlap) and divergences in findings/perspectives/opinions/methodologies etc between related sources
· draw conclusions about what is know and what needs to be further researched in the field/unknown
This document should be:
· double-spaced
· 12 pt font
· 1 inch margins
· In-text citations should be utilized and should refer back to the full citations of the Annotated Bibliography (but not copy them!)
· a response of 750 words or more here is required.
Synthesis
|
What is Synthesis? When researching, you will likely find more than a single source or voice discussing any given topic. How you, the reader/writer takes multiple voices, evidences, perspectives, etc and uses them as a basis for drawing conclusions is called Synthesis. Synthesis means making your sources talk How?: · taking different sources considering their ideas, findings, data, etc · using that as the basis for forming new ideas, findings, conclusions, etc of your own.
Why Synthesize? Research is a conversation, one that has been going on for a very long time amongst many speakers. Synthesis is a way for writers and researchers to enter into the conversation itself by using the many voices (sources) as a platform for formulating new ideas. Synthesis is how the conversation continues into new directions. |
Reflection for Annotated Bibliography
Copy and paste the questions and make the reflection a separate file straight forward honest answers
1. Discuss what the biggest challenge was for you in planning, researching, assembling, and writing the Annotated Bibliography. How did you overcome that challenge? What strategies were successful for you? Second, discuss one way that you feel Annotated Bibliography has enabled/prepared you to “enter” into the scholarly conversation regarding your topic. [200+ words].
2. Copy and paste what you consider to be your best, most effective (in responding to the prompt) paragraph in Essay #2. Note: It should be a paragraph from your synthesis of your sources. Now, using your knowledge of rhetoric and research and writing methods/practices in your discipline, discuss what rhetorical moves (writerly decisions/choices made) and discipline conventions you employed/adhered to in composing that paragraph. You must discuss how you made decisions regarding your utilization of at least two of the following: Tone/Voice, Writing to Audience, Context, Medium, Goal [200-300 words, not including pasted material]. It is especially important to highlight/emphasize how you integrated your sources, interpreted or analyzed their contribution(s) to the discourse, and presented that information to your scholarly audience.