response to presentation 2
Net Neutrality and its Regulation
Group 8: ESPN the Ocho
Section 1: Background Information
Net Neutrality
No single definition
“The owners of the networks that provide access to the internet should not control how consumers lawfully use the network; and should not be able to discriminate against content provider access to that network” - CRS 2019
Blocking, Throttling, Paid Prioritization
Matt
Broadband Internet Access Services (BIAS) Retail broadband internet that individuals or businesses buy access to from telecommunications companies
AT&T, Comcast, Cox Communications, etc
Lack of options in more rural areas of the US
Matt
How has the Internet been regulated so far? 1934 Communications Act, 1996 Telecommunications Act
FCC 2015 Open Internet Order - Telecommunications service under the FCC
FCC 2017 Restoring Internet Freedom Order - Information service under the FTC
Matt
What’s the difference between FCC and FTC? FCC
Telecommunications service (common carriers)
Net Neutrality
Prescriptive rules and regulations
FTC
Information Service
No Net Neutrality
Reactive investigations
Potential Issues
No rules preventing internet hosts from altering access to the internet
Market Monopolies
Economic Interests v Public Interest
Section 2: Potential Alternatives
Federal Trade Commission (status quo)
Pros
Has more authority over consumer protection
Has authority to police “bad actors” (providers trying to establish unfair business)
Cons
Little room for feedback
Investigations take several years to complete
Lack the authority to outlaw blocking or throttling.
Can only take actions once a violation happens and is investigated
Chensiha n
Federal Communications Commission
Pros
Prescriptive approach allows for guidelines to be made beforehand
Already has regulations for Net Neutrality, protection against blocking, throttling, paid prioritization
Cons
Focus on only telecom industry
Protections are designed for free market not individuals
Little room for the feedback
It takes years to create a legislation
Chendi
New Federal Department
Pros
Immediate authority over internet activities
Removes bias from previous federal departments
Cons
Subject to potential lag time for policy alteration
Still likely to be subject to political lobbying
Would require funds and time to create a new department
Chensiha n
Private Company
Pros
Easier for an individual citizen to work for
Keep pace with the internet
Cons
Power would have to be given by the federal government
Limited input from citizens outside the company
Enforcement of policies might drag on
Can't ensure fair and equal internet access
Shaylan
International Coalition
Pros
Economic sanctions and security agreements give merit to decisions
Consolidate opinions from people of different backgrounds
Ensure fair and equal access
Cons
Hard to enforce international agreements
Less input from each individual
Slow meetings and discussions
Shaylan
Section 3: Viable Alternatives
New Federal Department
Pros
Would automatically have authority/respect as it is a government department
With a new departement, modifications could be made to the current system of FCC and FTC in order to create a more citizen influenced agency.
Cons
Would take a considerable amount of time to create a new federal department.
The potential for this agency to be greatly influenced by lobbying and could create additional problems
Nick
International Coalition
Pros
Greater input on decisions-more voices to help solve complex internet related issues
Unified system where all countries are on the same page in regards to net neutrality
Would be a respected agency as it would include the most powerful countries in the world
Cons
Would take a considerable amount of time to organize the coalition.
Due to the international nature of the agency, they would likely be slow to make decisions
Potentially for major disagreements between countries within the coalition, potential for no real progress on issues
Nick
Cost Estimates
Federal Dept
FY 2018 FCC expenses: $354 million
Includes salaries and infrastructure upgrades/modernization
Estimated cost: $500 million
United Nations Organization
World Intellectual Property Organization
USA 2017 contribution: $1.2 million of 422 million budget
Estimated cost: $2.5 million
Logan
Implementation
Fed
Create a bill to propose a new federal agency to control regulations around the internet
Or
Create an executive order that implements this new agency with control over regulating the internet
United Nations Organization
A Relationship Agreement is presented to the UN by an organization seeking affiliation
This affiliation allows for the organization to receive funds and consult from UN administrative officers
Logan
Sources Used 2020 Democrats Have Plans to Add New Federal Agencies https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2019/08/2020-democrats-have-plans-add-new-federal-agenci es/159311/ Access to Broadband Networks: Net Neutrality https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10955 FCC 2019 Budget Proposal in Brief https://www.fcc.gov/document/fy-2019-budget-brief FCC Open Internet Order 2015 https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-open-internet-order Issues Raised by Open Internet Order https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43971 The Net Neutrality Debate: Access to Broadband Networks https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R40616 United Nations System - Total revenue by agency https://unsceb.org/content/FS-A00-03
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Net Neutrality
- Broadband Internet Access Services (BIAS)
- How has the Internet been regulated so far?
- What’s the difference between FCC and FTC?
- Potential Issues
- Slide 8
- Federal Trade Commission (status quo)
- Federal Communications Commission
- New Federal Department
- Private Company
- International Coalition
- Slide 14
- New Federal Department
- International Coalition
- Cost Estimates
- Implementation
- Slide 19