250-500 words

Kjjanders4

ESD-530Rubric-ClinicalFieldExperienceC_ImplementingDifferentiatedActivities.pdf

Home >Education homework help >250-500 words

Clinical Field Experience C: Implementing Differentiated Activities - Rubric

Reflection 8 points

Criteria Description

Reflection

5. Target 8 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is thorough and specific.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is detailed.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is vague.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the

mentor teacher is inadequate.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Technology Use 8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Use

5. Target 8 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is insightfully discussed.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is competently discussed.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is lacking detail.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or

group is unclear.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Effectiveness 8 points

Criteria Description

Effectiveness

5. Target 8 points

Reflection thoughtfully discussed what was effective about the activity and what

would be changed for next time. Proficient reasoning is provided.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Reflection clearly discussed what was effective about the activity and what would be

changed for next time. Relevant reasoning is provided.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Reflection vaguely discussed what was effective about the activity and what would

be changed for next time. Weak reasoning is provided.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Reflection ineffectively discussed what was effective about the activity and what

would be changed for next time. Fails to provide reasoning.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Objectives 8 points

Criteria Description

Objectives

5. Target 8 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is expertly discussed and sound

reasoning is provided.

4. Acceptable 6.96 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is discussed and reasoning is provided.

3. Approaching 5.92 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is unclearly discussed and reasoning is

not provided.

2. Insufficient 5.52 points

Whether or not students met the objectives is incomprehensible.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Organization 4 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 4 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 3.48 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 2.96 points

The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense

of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 2.76 points

The content is unorganized with and indiscernible sequence. The ideas presented

are compartmentalized, and the main idea is unclear.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target 4 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 3.48 points

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A

variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as

appropriate practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 2.96 points

Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension.

Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related

language.

2. Insufficient 2.76 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 40 points

https://www.gce.com/