Bench Mark

Kjjanders4

ESD-530Rubric-BenchmarkDifferentiationwithTechnologyLessonPlan.pdf

Home >Education homework help >Bench Mark

Benchmark – Differentiation with Technology Lesson Plan - Rubric

Multiple Means of Representation (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Representation (C5.8)

5. Target 60 points

Creatively presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate

methods or tools. Thoughtfully includes materials and strategies that consider

learning theories to help students make connections across the curriculum,

curricular goals, and community as well as addressing the needs of diverse students

outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate methods or tools.

Includes relevant materials and strategies that consider learning theories to help

students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community

as well as addressing the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan

Template.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Presents content using methods or tools that are not developmentally appropriate.

Materials and strategies included do not take into consideration learning theories

to help students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, or

community and do not address the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE

Lesson Plan Template.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Ineffectively presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate

methods or tools. Materials and strategies that consider learning theories to help

students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community

as well as addressing the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan

Template are inappropriate or not included.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Multiple Means of Engagement (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Engagement (C4.8)

5. Target 60 points

Innovatively uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Meaningfully addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Effectively uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Appropriately addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Vaguely uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Does not fully address the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Implausibly uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Inadequately addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Multiple Means of Expression (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Expression (C4.5)

5. Target 60 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are well-aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards, and they effectively and creatively identify

multiple means for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all

students. Advanced strategies to prepare all students for assessment formats,

including appropriate accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for

students with disabilities are included.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are generally aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards, and they clearly identify multiple means for

response, selection, and composition to accommodate all students. Effective

strategies to prepare all students for assessment formats, including appropriate

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are included.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are vaguely aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards. Attempt to identify multiple means for response,

selection, and composition to accommodate all students is lacking depth. Strategies

included to prepare all students for assessment formats, including

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are weak.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are not clearly aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards. They do not sufficiently identify multiple means

for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all students. Strategies

included to prepare all students for assessment formats, including

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are inappropriate for students.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Section 2: Extension Activity and/or Homework 60 points

Criteria Description

Section 2: Extension Activity and/or Homework

5. Target 60 points

Extension activities and/or homework creatively explains strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Extension activities and/or homework clearly explains strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Extension activities and/or homework are unfocused, lacking realism, or do not

clearly explain strategies that include a students’ family and/or community to assist

with developing a real-world connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of

the content.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Extension activities and/or homework are inappropriate or unrelated to the

developed lesson and/or do not include an explanation of strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

COE Lesson Plan Template Format 30 points

Criteria Description

COE Lesson Plan Template Format

5. Target 30 points

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All COE Lesson Plan template and

format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable 26.1 points

Content is clear. Appropriate COE Lesson Plan template is fully used. There are very

few errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching 22.2 points

Content is unfocused. Appropriate COE Lesson Plan template is used, but

formatting includes several errors or lack of clarity.

2. Insufficient 20.7 points

Content is confusing. COE Lesson Plan template is missing key elements or includes

pervasive errors. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 15 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target 15 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language.

4. Acceptable 13.05 points

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present.

Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 11.1 points

Submission includes mechanical errors, non-relevant language, or inconsistencies

in language that hinder comprehension.

2. Insufficient 10.35 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Documentation of Sources 15 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Target 15 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable 13.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Approaching 11.1 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several

minor formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient 10.35 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 300 points

https://www.gce.com/