Paper week 2 423
|
Category |
Beginning 5 points/2.5 points |
Developing 10 points/5 points |
Accomplished 15 points/7.5 pts |
Exemplary 20 points/10 points |
|
Thesis and Support Lacking supporting evidence. Only 400 words |
The writing may need a more clearly articulated thesis and/or appropriate related subordinate ideas. Fuzzy logic may be evident and adequate supporting evidence is lacking. 5/5 |
The writing has a clear thesis and related subordinate ideas supported by clear thinking and appropriate evidence. Logical arguments may be one-sided or incomplete. 10/10 |
The writing has a clearly articulated thesis supported by appropriate evidence and sound logic. Minor gaps in logic and argument may appear. 15/15 |
The writing has a clearly articulated original thesis and subordinate ideas supported by reliable and relevant evidence based on original research. 20/20 |
|
Organization |
The writing is noticeably lacking in organization. There is no clear introduction nor conclusion and ideas are neither carefully nor fully developed. Supporting evidence is clearly lacking. 5/5 |
The writing demonstrates rudimentary organization and logical structure, but ideas may be more fully developed and supported by more appropriate evidence. 10/10 |
The writing is organized logically and flows well. An introduction and conclusion are evident, but transitions may be smoother. 15/15 |
The writing flows smoothly and logically from a well-defined thesis. It contains an appropriate introduction, conclusion, and smooth transitions. 20/20 |
|
Style |
The writing lacks clarity and is sometimes confusing. The language chosen is not appropriate to the subject nor the assignment.
5/5 |
The writing is clear but could be expressed in a style more appropriate to the subject. It is jargon-free but may require a more complete explanation of some terms used. 10/10 |
The writing keeps the reader’s attention through a carefully crafted prose style. Language chosen is appropriate to the subject, but may call attention to itself in minor ways. 15/15 |
The writing engages the reader through an original prose style appropriate to the subject. Language is precise. Sentences are varied but not noticeably so. Active voice is apparent. 20/20 |
|
Mechanics/Syntax/Grammar |
The writing exhibits substantial errors in grammar and style so that the basic ideas are lost. Sources are overly quoted and not adequately documented nor cited. 5/5 |
The writing could benefit from additional proofreading, as some errors impede the flow of the reading. Sources are documented and cited but need to show greater consistency.
10/10 |
The writing may exhibit a few minor errors in grammar or style, but do impair the flow of the reading. Most quoted material is properly documented and cited. 15/15 |
The writing is free of grammatical, proofreading, and stylistic errors. All quoted material is properly documented and cited. 20/20 |
|
APA format |
There are no resources cited. 2.5/2.5 |
References and in-text citations are included, but both are formatted incorrectly.
5/5 |
Either References or in-text citations are formatted incorrectly, or too much of the content is quoted or paraphrased, resulting in little original work. 7.5/7.5 |
References and in-text citations are included, appropriate and formatted correctly. Enough of the content is created by the student. 10/10 |
|
Timeliness and Format |
Assignment is not handed in by deadline and file name is not labeled using guidelines provided 2.5/2.5 |
Assignment is either not submitted by the due date or is not labeled correctly. 5/5 |
|
Assignment is turned in by the due date and is labeled correctly. 10/10 |