Article about a company from startup to IPO
ENTP 325 Early Stage Venture Financing Week #4
This week
Tuesday
Determining early stage valuations
Thursday
Negotiating with investors: Shark Tank case studies
Sunday
Quiz #2 (focus on crowdfunding, valuation and cap tables)
Cap tables introduction
Team exercise using the Startup Valuation Calculator
Equity crowdfunding update (May 2016 to May 2017)
Crowdfund Insider reports that in January 2018, equity crowdfunding offerings topped $100 million in capital raised.
The $100 million was raised via 731 campaigns.
Approximately 101,000 individuals invested in a campaign with an average $992 per investment.
Companies raised an average of $360,691 per campaign.
Nearly 50 percent of firms were located in California, Florida, or Texas
A total of 326 companies
Approximately 33 percent were mobile app/internet services companies;
Approximately 12 percent were consumer gadget companies;
Approximately 60 percent were in business one year or less
Determining early stage valuations
or….what is my startup worth?
What is Valuation?
Valuation reflects the entrepreneur’s determination of the acceptable amount of ownership that may be given in return for the investment, and the investor’s determination of the risks and rewards of the investment.
Investment deals often focus on the “pre-money” valuation of the company.
Pre-money valuation is the estimated value of the company as it stands prior to any purchase of equity.
The pre-money valuation of the company, combined with the amount of capital accepted by the company, determines the amount of equity ownership sold in exchange for capital.
The resulting valuation after the investment of capital is called the “post-money” valuation.
For example, in a company with a pre-money value of $5 million, a $5 million investment would buy a 50% ownership stake in the company.
10
Pre-money valuation
+
Investment money
=
Post-money valuation
What you’re worth before investment
What you’re worth after investment
Investment money
/
Post-money valuation
=
% equity given up
Valuation methodologies
Valuation methodologies differ by the stage of investment and the availability of quantitative and qualitative data.
Formal methods include:
409A – A formal report that is produced by a certified professional that uses multiple mathematical methods to value a company’s various classes of stock.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) – Uses future cash flow projections and discounts them to a present value by using an assumed cost of capital.
Multiple of Revenue or EBITDA – Valuations are sometimes set or influenced based on a multiple of the target company’s annual revenue or EBITDA earnings.
Seed Valuation Ranges
Y Combinator (accelerator) buys about 6% of a company for $15K-$20K. So the post-money valuation of their investments is $250K-$333K.
If you sell 20% of your company at a $2.5M post-money, you raise $500K. That’s about the maximum for a seed round.
But don’t fixate on valuation. Low valuations aren’t bad if you keep the dilution down too. 6% dilution is very low if the company makes a lot of progress with $15K-$20K.
Consider two scenarios – Dropbox vs. Instagram
Drew Houston went to Y-Combinator, where he received about $20K in exchange for 5% of Dropbox.
Valuation $400K
Kevin Systrom went to Baseline Ventures and received $500k in exchange for about 20% of Brbn (predecessor of Instagram).
Valuation $2.5M
Challenges with early stage valuations
The high degree of uncertainty inherent in seed and early-stage investments translates into low pre-money valuations.
Failure rates of startup companies are high, so investors must be compensated for placing their capital at such risk.
Valuations at the “seed stage” are generally driven by factors that by their nature are subjective.
Subjective valuation methods
Traction
Expressions of interest
Beta tests
Conditional orders
Product
Intellectual property
Design spec
Working prototype
Beta test
App store
Industry “hotness”
External validation
Press articles
Beta customers
Incubator/accelerator
Team
Founder credentials
Advisors
Investors with credentials
Team commitment
Comparable companies
Value drivers are used to value startups which often have little or no earning
For an internet startup, value-drivers could be market share, page views and number of subscribers.
Example: take the ratio of market value and value driver of the market leader (example: market value of each percentage point of market share) and multiply that by the target firm’s value driver.
Problem with this approach is many of these firms never show any earning despite showing huge market valuation.
Plus there is substantial risk involved
Risk areas: Value is the inverse of risk. The more layers of risk your company has, the lower valuation you get.
Opportunity Size (Total Addressable Market, direction of market)
Team (composition, execution experience, subject matter expertise, professional network)
Development (sweat equity, skin-in-game, milestones completed)
Competitive Advantage (approach vs. pricing vs. technology vs. network-effect)
Traction (eyeballs, customers, revenue, earnings)
Distribution (repeatable processes, recurring earnings)
New founders may think that startup valuations work like this (the Shark Tank method):
I figure out what the value of my existing company is
I figure out how much money I need
I give the % away equal to: money needed/(valuation + money needed)
In reality, valuation is a process of reducing layers of risk.
So, it looks more like this for angel/seed round:
Founder convinces investors that they are investor-ready
Founder convinces investors they need $X
Investors ask for 15% to 25% post-money
Post-money valuation ends up being calculated
(e.g. $1.5M investment/20% stake = $7.5M post-money)
Notice that here we don’t have to worry about determining pre-money valuation
23
Investment received
/
% equity given
=
Post-money valuation
What you’re worth after investment
Setting value based on how much money you need
Figure out how much money you need to grow to a point where you will show significant growth and raise the next round of investment.
Let’s say that number is $100,000, to last you 18 months.
Your investor does not have a lot of incentive to negotiate you down from this number.
Why? Because you showed that this is the minimum amount you need to grow to the next stage.
Now figure out how much of the company to give to the investor
It could not be anything more than 50% because that will leave you, the founder, with little incentive to work hard.
Also, it could not be 40% because that will leave very little equity for investors in your next round.
30% would be reasonable if you are getting a large chunk of seed money.
In this case you are looking for only $100,000, a relatively small amount.
So you will probably give away 5-20% of the company, depending on your valuation.
Setting value based on how much money you need
As you see, $100,000 is set in stone. 5%-20% equity is also set.
That puts the (pre-money) valuation somewhere between $500,000 (if you give away 20% of the company for $100,000) and $2 Million (if you give away 5% of the company for $100,000).
Where in that range will it be?
That will depend on how other investors value similar companies.
How well you can convince the investor that you really will grow fast.
Other subjective factors
Other approaches
Venture Capital method
Dave Berkus method
Scorecard method
Risk factor summarization method
Venture Capital Method
This tool requires the estimation of the eventual selling price of the company, which is then divided by the investors’ anticipated ROI to arrive at a current valuation.
Return on Investment (ROI) = Terminal (Harvest) Value ÷ Post-money Valuation
In the case of one investment round, no subsequent investment and therefore no dilution) then:
Post-money Valuation = Terminal Value ÷ Anticipated ROI
Dave Berkus Method
Attributes a range of dollar values to the progress startup entrepreneurs have made in their commercialization activities, the sum of which becomes the valuation of the company (pre-money valuation)
If Exists: Add to Company Value up to:
1. Sound Idea (basic value, product risk) $1/2 million
2. Prototype (reducing technology risk) $1/2 million
3. Quality Management Team (reducing execution risk) $1/2 million
4. Strategic relationships (reducing market risk and competitive risk) $1/2 million
5. Product Rollout or Sales (reducing financial or production risk) $1/2 million
Note that these numbers are maximums that can be “earned” to form a valuation, allowing for a pre-revenue valuation of up to $2 million (or a post rollout value of up to $2.5 million)
Scorecard valuation method
This method adjusts the median pre-money valuation for seed/startup deals in a particular region and in the business vertical of the target based on seven characteristics of the company.
Multiplying the Sum of Factors (1.075) times the average pre-money valuation of $1.5 million we arrive at a pre-money valuation for the target company of about $1.6 million
Risk Factor Summation Method
This method compares 12 characteristics of the target company to what might be expected in a fundable seed/startup company
Risk areas:
Management
Stage of the business
Legislation/Political risk
Manufacturing risk
Sales and marketing risk
Funding/capital raising risk
Competition risk
Technology risk
Litigation risk
International risk
Reputation risk
Potential lucrative exit
Each risk is assessed, as follows:
+2 Very positive for growing the company
+1 Positive
0 Neutral
-1 Negative for growing the company
-2 Very negative
The average pre-money valuation of pre-revenue companies is then adjusted
Positively by $250K for every +1 (+$500K for a +2)
Negatively by $250K for every -1 (-$500K for a -2).
Example: assume the average pre-money valuation of pre-revenue companies is $2.0M
If your judgment of the twelve factors above has five neutral assessments (five zeros), five +1’s, one -1 and one -2 (a net of two +1’s), then add $500K to the average valuation of $2.0 million, arriving at a $2.5 million pre-money valuation.
Control and fairness test
Terms often matter more than the valuation
For a higher valuation, you may be giving up some control, like a board seat.
Why do people push super high valuations?
It’s one of the few moments in your company’s history where you can get a stamp of validation.
Just like good grades or good schools help drive your self-worth, a great valuation can do that too.
It’s something you can tell others or use to compare.
So, the bigger the stamp, the more likely you’re seemingly doing well.
Don’t be tempted by this.
Downrounds
Don’t risk a down round
A down round happens when the valuation of your next round is less than your current round.
No one comes away from that undamaged.
That can happen when people are too aggressive about their valuation in that first round.
Keep your next round of funding in mind
More articles…
http://www.angelcapitalassociation.org/blog/methods-for-valuation-of-seed-stage-startup-companies/
http://josephwalla.com/seed-rounds-how-to-pick-a-valuation
http://shockwaveinnovations.com/2013/10/06/boosting-valuation-before-you-have-revenue-traction/
http://fundersandfounders.com/how-startup-valuation-works/
http://venturehacks.com/articles/seed-valuation
https://blog.adioma.com/how-startup-valuation-works-infographic/
Team exercise using the Startup Valuation Calculator
https://www.caycon.com/valuation.php
Cap tables introduction
What is a capitalization (cap) table?
A table providing an analysis of a company's percentages of ownership, equity dilution, and value of equity in each round of investment by founders, investors, and other owners.
The basics
At its most basic level, a cap table is just a list of your company’s securities (i.e., stock, options, warrants, etc.) and who owns those securities.
More complex cap tables may also include formulas that model out various hypothetical transactions (e.g., new financings, sales of the Company (M&A) or public offerings).
Cap tables can be summary in nature (e.g., grouping all holders into simplified buckets such as “founders” and “investors” and/or grouping multiple series of preferred stock into a single “preferred stock” bucket) or detailed in nature (e.g., providing granular detail on the holdings of each individual owner and each individual type of security).
There is no one right or wrong format for a cap table. It all depends on how you will be using the cap table.
Why do you need one?
Raising money
Issuing options
Hiring key employees
Staying compliant.
A major part of cap table management is tax and regulation compliance.
The IRS has a lot to say when it comes to the taxation of equity, so you need to make sure you’re doing things right.
If you do it wrong, you or your employees could end up paying tax penalties or paying more taxes than you need to.
Selling the company
Your cap table must be current at all times to make good decisions
You need a cap table because you will be constantly making decisions that impact your capitalization and/or are colored by your capitalization.
For example, if you are considering a new financing, you need to be able to quickly run scenarios based on different pre-money valuations, different round sizes, different available option pool targets, etc.
Or, if you are recruiting a new COO and the candidate asks for options covering a certain percentage of the company, you need to be able to quickly determine whether you have sufficient shares available in your option pool, determine how dilutive the new grant will be to other holders and calculate the exact number of shares that represents the requested percentage.
There is no “right” way to format your cap table: keep it organized and simple
It all depends on what questions you are trying to answer.
The right cap table for a CEO might look different than the right cap table for a CFO.
And the right cap table for a company that is trying to analyze multiple VC term sheets might look different than the right cap table for a company that just closed its Series A financing.
Even though the form of cap table may change depending on the use case, the underlying data should remain constant.
Keep it organized and simple
You should be able to quickly tell who owns those securities.
Should really be a collection of ledgers that includes the following at a minimum:
Stockholder name
Date of issuance
Number of shares or units issued
Date of disposition if the security is no longer outstanding
Concise and consistently-worded commentary
What can go wrong?
The cap table is a representation of company ownership, most often kept in a spreadsheet as a mathematical interpretation of legal prose from equity and debt contracts.
As your company increases in complexity over time, so does the probability of the cap table falling out of sync with its legal reality.
The simplest example where things go wrong is the vesting schedule.
The cap table is really a living ledger.
It’s a history of every transaction that resulted in your ownership structure as it stands today, but also contains the blueprint of what it will look like tomorrow.
Cap Table #1
100%
33.33%
33.33%
33.33%
% of Outstanding Stock
100
Amanda
300
TOTAL
100
Stuart
100
Jason
Shares of Common Stock
Cap Table #2
10%
1M
1M (Series Seed)
-
-
Angels
10M
3M
3M
3M
Shares Fully Diluted
100%
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
% of Outstanding Stock
1M
-
-
-
Shares of Preferred Stock
30%
3M
Amanda
100%
9M
TOTAL
30%
3M
Stuart
30%
3M
Jason
% Fully Diluted
Shares of Common Stock
Angels invest $.5M at a $4.5M pre-investment valuation
Cap Table #3
14M
3M
1M
1M
3M
3M
3M
Total Outstanding Stock
21.43%
-
3M (c)
Stuart
7.1%
-
1M (series seed)
Angels
7.1%
-
1M (c)
Employees / Consultants
3M
3M (series A)
-
-
New Shares
100%
21.43%
21.43%
21.43%
% of Outstanding Stock
3M (c)
Amanda
11M
TOTAL
-
VC
3M (c)
Jason
Shares of Outstanding Stock
VC invests $3M at an $11M pre-investment valuation (equity option pool counts as part of the pre-investment capitalization)
Let’s create one…
Create a cap table with three founders
More articles…
http://www.alleywatch.com/2016/08/managing-cap-table/
https://gust.com/launch/blog/cap-table-management-tips
Negotiating with investors: Shark Tank case studies
Shark Tank questions
What to present, how to present
What did founders do right, wrong
What did investors do right, wrong
What would you have done differently?
Shark Tank #1
Coolpeds or CoinOut (segment 4, 5)
http://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/episode-guide/season-09/23-episode-23
Shark Tank #3
Thrive (last segment)
http://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/episode-guide/season-09/24-episode-24
This week’s readings (complete by end of week)
Definitive Guide to Raising Money from Angels (in Blackboard)
Continue reading Angel Investing (Rose)
56
Quiz #2 by Sunday midnight
Covers content from weeks 3-4
57
Next week
Tuesday
Valuation timelines and determining investment needs; market sizing
Thursday
Angel investing introduction: SAFE, convertible notes, equity
Sunday
Finish reading Angel Investing – Gust Guide (Rose)
Accelerators as funding vehicles
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }
.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; }