High Quality Assignments Required - NOT SIMPLE ESSAYS - BIS ONLY IF YOU CAN - DUE 3 DAYS
ENGL 603
Application Paper Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
Substance of Argument |
17 to 20 points Sophisticated, insightful; well-supported with sufficient, relevant evidence from text |
10 to 16 points Meets the assignment requirements and does so well, solid claim and good ideas about the text under consideration; solid evidence that backs up the main claims |
1 to 9 points Adequate, but perhaps somewhat superficial, ideas that address the assignment requirements; weak or missing development or support or what is included is poorly integrated |
0 points No analysis |
|
Arrangement of Argument |
13 to 15 points Analysis is developed sequentially, with a clear setup in introduction and wrap-up in conclusion; paragraphs are well unified and coherent, headed by strong topic sentences; paragraphs are well connected through transitions and are arranged in a logical manner |
7 to 12 points Analysis is arranged so that readers can follow argument; one element might need to be strengthened (such as introduction or conclusion, transitions, or topic sentences); paragraphs are coherent and unified |
1 to 6 points Arrangement of analysis undercuts argument—whether missing introduction or conclusion, unclear connections between ideas, paragraphs not well unified or coherent, or topic sentences missing |
0 points No clear organization plan |
|
Clarity of Argument |
12 to 14 points Analysis is supported by clear communication; strong, engaging sentences; and precise word choice throughout |
6 to 11 points Analysis is conveyed by logically constructed sentences; they may not be as engaging as those that earn the “advanced” rating; word choice communicates the analysis being done |
1 to 5 points Analysis is undermined by unclear communication (either in the sentence structure or unclear or weak word choice) |
0 points Opaque, extremely difficult to follow |
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
Grammar and Mechanics |
13 to 15 points Rare grammar errors or stylistic flaws |
7 to 12 points Some minor grammar issues |
A range from minor grammar errors that occur throughout paper to major errors (score depends on level of grammar errors present) |
0 points Egregious grammar errors that mar most sentences |
|
Documentation |
5 to 6 points Perfectly cited material (both in-text documentation and bibliography entry) |
3 to 4 points Mostly correct citations (in-text documentation and bibliography entry); may have some minor errors |
1 to 2 points Poor citations (citations are attempted, but major errors in either punctuation or format) |
0 points No documentation (in-text citations or bibliography) |
Page 2 of 2