Field Project _ Proposal - 10 Hours - Urgent (2.5 Pages) - Grading Rubric Attached
ENGL 602
Writing in Your Field Project Proposal Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Genre and Topic |
28 to 30 points The genre (form) and topic of the proposed project are clearly stated, and why each was chosen is substantially explained. |
25 to 27 points The genre (form) and topic of the proposed project are stated, and why each was chosen is adequately explained. |
1 to 24 points The genre (form) and topic of the proposed project are discernible, but the reason they were chosen may not be explained. |
0 points The genre and topic of the project are not mentioned. |
|
|
Description of Sources |
The types of sources planned to use in the proposed project are substantially described. Specific source names are acceptable but not required.
|
25 to 27 points The types of sources planned to use in the proposed project are adequately described. |
1 to 24 points The types of sources planned to use in the proposed project are mentioned but not adequately described.. |
0 points Sources for the proposed project are not mentioned. |
|
|
Research Method |
28 to 30 points The student has explained, in substantial detail, the method(s) planned to follow for organizing the proposed project, finding sources, and presenting the results. |
25 to 27 points The student has explained, in adequate detail, the method(s) planned to follow for organizing the proposed project, finding sources, and presenting the results. |
1 to 24 points The student mentions the planned research method but does so in inadequate detail or fails to address one or more of the following: organizing the proposed project, finding sources, or presenting the results.
|
0 points The planned research method is not mentioned. |
|
|
Audience Awareness |
14 to 15 points The proposal is written in such a way that it can be understood clearly by people outside the chosen field. Field-specific jargon is kept to a minimum. |
13 to 13 points The proposal is written in such a way that it can be understood, for the most part, by people outside the chosen field. Some unnecessary field-specific jargon may be used. |
1 to 12 points The proposal is written in such a way that it may be difficult to understand for people outside the chosen field. A significant amount of unnecessary field-specific jargon may be used. |
0 points The proposal is written in such a way that it is inaccessible to people outside the chosen field.. |
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Style and Mechanics |
14 to 15 points The writing is professional in tone and style, with few to no errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The proposal is 2 pages. |
13 to 14 points The writing is mostly professional in tone and style, with some errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The proposal is close to 2 pages. |
1 to 12 points The writing is somewhat unprofessional in tone and style, with frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The proposal is between 1 and 2 pages. |
0 points The tone and style are entirely unprofessional, OR errors are frequent and significant enough to seriously impede readability, OR the proposal is 1 page or less. |
|
|
Documentation |
28 to 30 points Proposal includes 2-3 correctly cited sources (these may or may not be sources to be used in the final project), both in-text and in a reference page/works cited/bibliography, according to the style most commonly used in the chosen field. |
25 to 27 points Proposal includes 2-3 sources that are mostly correctly cited, with no more than a few errors. |
1 to 24 points Proposal includes 1-2 sources. Citations may include frequent or significant errors. |
0 points No sources are cited in-text and/or at the end. |
|
|
Total |
/150 |
||||
|
Instructor's Comments: |
Page 3 of 3