|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Content 70%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not Present
|
Points Earned
|
|
Development
|
157 to 175 points
Thesis has clear focus.
Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Ideas not only answer prompt but expands it modified topic.
Includes previous writers and/or ideas to reflect broad knowledge of specific topic’s place in Classical Rhetoric.
Content is persuasive and comprehensive.
All requirements must be met.
|
105 to 156 points
Thesis has a focus but further refinement necessary.
Major points generally support thesis but may need additional support or clarity to establish clear connections.
Limited contextualization of the primary rhetor/theme/work.
Content is somewhat persuasive and comprehensive.
All requirements must be met.
|
1 to 104 points
Thesis present but unclear.
Major points not connected to thesis, unclear, and not sufficiently supported.
No contextualization of the primary rhetor/theme/work.
Content not comprehensive.
All requirements must be met.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
Scope
|
18 to 20 points
The content is specific and manageable, focused on specific topic with in-depth support.
|
12 to 17 points
The content is specific in some areas but might leave others too broad.
|
1 to 16 points
The content is broad, often trying to cover the entirety of a work and not going in-depth with any one topic or theme.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
Source Integration
|
45 to 50 points
Writing seamlessly includes secondary sources as part of the academic conversation around a specific topic.
Secondary sources appropriate for the topic.
All requirements must be met.
|
30 to 44 points
Secondary sources included as part of the academic conversation, but connections to specific topic may not be consistent.
Secondary sources not always appropriate for the topic.
All requirements must be met.
|
1 to 29 points
Secondary sources included but not really connected to one another. Mentioned as isolated works.
Secondary sources not appropriate for the topic.
All at least one requirement must be met.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
Structure 30%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not Present
|
Points Earned
|
|
Organization
|
31 to 35 points
Structure presents clear and coherent ideas.
Paragraphs unified with clear focus.
Transitional wording/phrasing indicates shifts in focus and logical connections between ideas.
|
20 to 30 points
Structure reflects the prompted but may not blend together as one focus.
Content is generally focused and unified. Some redundancy present, which hinders the flow of ideas.
Basic transitions present.
|
1 to 19 points
Structure not clear or present. No clear order of ideas.
Content may address prompt but does not reveal blending ideas together for a single focus.
Limited to no attempts at transitioning.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
Grammar and Mechanics
|
31 to 35 points
The writing reflects
grammatical,
punctuation, and
spelling standards.
Language is accurate,
appropriate, effective, and reflects graduate level diction.
The tone is appropriate
and highly effective.
|
20 to 30 points
The writing contains
some grammatical,
punctuation, and / or spelling errors.
Language is unclear,
awkward or
inappropriate in parts.
Tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.
|
1 to 19 points
The writing contains
many grammatical,
punctuation and/or
spelling errors.
Language use is
largely inaccurate or inappropriate.
The tone is
ineffective and/or inappropriate.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
APA Formatting
|
31 to 35 points
Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.
Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.
|
20 to 30 points
Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.
Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.
|
1 to 19 points
Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.
Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and / or references are not provided.
|
0 points
Not present.
|
|
|
Total
|
/350
|
|
Instructor's Comments:
|