3 Discussion Questions... with 3 matching student responses.. 1 short paper & 1 short business letter

ENG 315: Professional Communication

Week 4 Discussion: Delivering Bad News Messages

Delivering Bad News Messages

In the Chapter 7 reading, you learned about inductive and deductive methods of reasoning and communication. Share an example of a "bad news message" either from the text or from an online article you've seen (provide a link, please, if you choose the latter option). Explain whether you believe inductive OR deductive reasoning would be more effective to share that bad news with others and why.

After you have responded to this starter thread, don't forget to reply to at least one classmate to meet the minimum posting frequency requirement.

Student Response:

Erica Collins

RE: Week 4 Discussion: Delivering Bad News Messages

"They never gave me a fair chance," That's unfair," "This just can't be." In this case I will have to go with inductive reasoning after reviewing in some ways they are so similar to one another. Inductive reasoning is more based on uncertainty and deductive reasoning is more factual. In this case the conversation is more of an assumption.

I would think deductive would be more effective to share because deductive focus more on facts. Deductive Reasoning is the basic form of valid reasoning in my words accurate information that can be proven. Inductive reasoning is the premises in which the premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for truth. In my words this seems more of an opinion until proven. Tom me they are similar you have to really read to understand the difference of inductive and deductive reasoning.