PACES and Analysis Practice-5page

Reading: Twenge:   https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our- changing-culture/201708/why-so-many-teens-today-have- become-depressed What are the PACES to this argument? Project _______________________________ Argument _____________________________ Claims _______________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Evidence _____________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Rhetorical Strategies ____________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Summarize argument using PACES. While summarizing, you will also analyze his argument and evaluate the effectiveness thereof. Every paragraph should have summary, analysis, and evaluation. Every paragraph should have at least one quote (no more than two lines long), along with analysis of that quote. Your intro paragraph should introduce the author, the article, the topic, and your final evaluation of the author's argument (effective or ineffective). Each body paragraph should support and strengthen your claim as to whether the author is effective or ineffective. Your conclusion should summarize your paper while adding no new information. Stick to the Claims and Evidence that are easiest for you to analyze, and do not try to summarize everything the author says.  Paper two is about evaluating different sources and how they interact. Specifically, you guys need to be able to prove to me that you know how to use the connections: Extend (To agree and take the point farther), Illustrate (To agree and add new evidence), Complicate (To partially disagree by reframing the issue or adding new evidence), Challenge (To completely disagree), and Qualify (To agree, but only under specific circumstances or to a point). My own special addition to this paper is the understanding of

rhetorical effectiveness and how it works to make an argument more persuasive. I want you guys to look at the four different articles we have read in class:Clive Thompson's "Public Thinking," Nicholas Carr's “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, and Jean M. Twenge's "Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?". First, you will give me the PACES of each of them, remembering to explain why they are what you argue they are. Remember to add rhetorical effectiveness throughout the PACES, as that will the easiest way to finish the argument later.             Then, tell me the ways that the articles interact with one another. Specifically, how Fernandez's article interacts with Thompson's and how Twenge's response interacts with both Fernandez' and Thompson's articles. Once again, tell me why they interact the way you argue. In this situation, looking at their claims and evidence—and seeing what conclusions they point to—can help to articulate your opinion.             Finally, tell me which of the arguments you agree with the most and why you agree with that argument. Please stick to the texts when evaluating which you find to be the most rhetorically effective. That is, tell me what the authors did correctly, or what the authors did incorrectly, in order to make each of them more or less effective. As with the other parts of this essay, an explanation for your decision will be required. This paper will be graded on: Clarity of diction, Explanation of decision, Analysis of argumentation, and Final argumentative quality.