The Quote Sandwich
Chapter 5: Framing Every Quote
Your claim is just a small part of your final paper. Most of the actual words in
any academic paper go toward proving the claim. Relevant quotes and evidence
support academic arguments.
In a general sense, a good time to quote is when the author uses such exact
language that a paraphrase would lead to inaccuracies or when the writer wants to
focus on the specific words the author uses to make a nuanced point. Another good time
to quote is when the quote is composed of scholarly research or expert opinion that
helps you prove your claim. We may not be experts in the fields we are writing about,
but our sources are, so look to lean on their expertise in supporting your claims.
After some research, relevant support usually isn't the issue, but smoothly
incorporating those passages into their own writing can be a bigger challenge. One
common problem when incorporating quotes is not providing enough context. In most
cases, a lead-in is necessary or your readers may not know the source of the quote. This
is a jarring effect. Let's look at this quote for an example.
Unfortunately, voter disenfranchisement has existed in America for a very long
time. "The United States this great democracy, was founded as this experiment,
and it was a great experiment. But it was a very limited one as well.”
A reader of this quote might wonder who is being quoted and why?
Another quoting issue students often commit is known as the "hit and run"
quote, in which the student simply "drops" a quote into his or her writing and then
abruptly moves to a different point once the quote is over. This approach to quoting is
something to avoid because evidence should not "speak for itself." You cannot assume
that your readers will just "get" why the quote is included or what it has to do with your
claim. Remember, writers mainly use evidence to help illustrate or "prove" a
point/claim they are making, so it is up to you to make this connection between their
purpose and the content of the quote.
Thankfully, there is a simple approach to incorporating direct quotes into your
writing that can help you avoid these two problems: frame every quote. By "framing,"
we are referring to surrounding your direct quotes with content that helps you avoid
the two issues mentioned above:
• Include a short lead-in phrase or sentence that introduces where the quote is
coming from, who said it, and maybe even a bit about who the author is;
• and a sentence after the quote in which you explain the relevance or
importance of the passage in relation to the claim you are making.
Here is a wonderful example of the first "part" of framing a quote from Rebecca Perl's
"The Last Disenfranchised Class," one of our "They Say" articles from Week O ne:
The United States, this great democracy, was founded as this experiment, and it
was a great experiment. But it was a very limited one as well,” says Marc Mauer
of the Sentencing Project, a prison advocacy group in Washington, DC.
Even though the "lead-in" phrase is found at the end of the sentence, it "does"
exactly what is needed: we learn who the author of the quote is (Marc Mauer), the
author's credentials (the Sentencing Project), and even a bit of explanation as to what
the group Mauer is a part of is all about (prison advocacy). We could even take things a
bit further by thinking back to the Active Verb list from Week One/Discussion 4 and
replace Perl's rather general/neutral verb "says" with a more specific verb that better
"captures" or describes what is being said. In this case, perhaps "laments" would be a
more "accurate" verb.
Let's continue with the above-example from Perl's "They Say" article by
composing the second part of the frame, where we explain the quotes relevance or
importance (in bold). I have also added the claim I am making in a sentence before the
quote itself:
Unfortunately, voter disenfranchisement has existed in American for a very long
time. “The United States, this great democracy, was founded as this experiment,
and it was a great experiment. But it was a very limited one as well,” laments
Marc Mauer of the Sentencing Project, a prison advocacy group in Washington,
DC. In other words, Mauer believes that the voting system in America was not
designed for all Americans, like minority voters, but a select few—namely
rich, white, and male.
In rephrasing what the quote says, I am not only able to direct the reader's
understanding about what Mauer is saying in the quote itself, but also to also connect it
to the claim I am making in the sentence at the start of the quote. The sentence also "sets
me up" to continue providing further examples of voter disenfranchisement in America,
to more fully prove my claim.
In Week One, we chose some quotes and responded to them as a means to help
generate ideas for what it is we eventually wanted to say. By now, however, you
probably have a much better sense of what your exact argument will be, and you will
need to find quotes to support your argument. When selecting quotes, you'll want to
consider how vital the quote is to your argument and whether the quote would be
better paraphrased instead. Completing the Annotated Bibliography for Discussion 1
this week will help you get a good start on locating this relevant evidence.
So, please revisit your "They Say" article(s) and re-highlight what quotes you
now think are vital to your argument. You have also chosen several quotes in
completing your annotated bibliography which you can use in this discussion as well.
Select three quotes and try to "frame" them in the manner discussed above—
don't forget to cite the quote in MLA style.