Education First Draft of a Review Assignment
ENG-105 Topic 5 Rubric: Review Assignment (ONL)
|
Criteria |
% Value |
1: Unsatisfactory |
2: Insufficient |
3: Approaching |
4: Acceptable |
5: Target |
|
% Scaling |
|
0% |
65% |
75% |
85% |
100% |
|
Content 60% |
||||||
|
Justification of provided criteria using research |
30% |
The criteria are incomplete and may lack relevant description or justification. No research or off-topic research is not effectively integrated. |
The criteria are not fully justified or described. Little research or some irrelevant research. Not all research is integrated. |
The criteria are justified, described, and researched. Some research is relevant and integrated. |
The criteria are justified, described, and researched. Most research is relevant and integrated. |
The criteria are thoughtfully justified, described clearly, and well-researched. All research is relevant and integrated effectively.
|
|
Evaluate how the subject does (or does not) meet the established criteria |
30% |
Evidence from the website and outside sources may not be present or may not support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website may not be present or relevant. Images may not be included. |
Evidence from the website and outside sources may not support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website may not be complete or relevant. Images are included.
|
Evidence from the website and outside sources sometimes support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are present. Some relevant images are included.
|
Evidence from the website and outside sources are used to support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are present and relevant to the criteria. The chosen images are relevant.
|
Evidence from the website and outside sources are carefully chosen to support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are thorough and show an impressive level of depth. The chosen images are relevant and add value to the evaluation.
|
|
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 40% |
||||||
|
Organization
|
10% |
No apparent organization is present. Ineffective introductory title and image does not invite readers or explain the subject. The statement is not present or missing elements. Underdeveloped sections lack focus and topic sentences. Conclusion is weak or missing. |
The review may not be organized or may not follow template guidelines. Introductory title and image may not relate to subject. Thesis statement may not be complete. Main sections may not be developed around topic sentences and may not always support ideas. and topic sentences. Weak conclusion is offered. |
The review is somewhat organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image relate to subject but may not engage readers. Thesis statement may not identify all criteria or may not clearly state the evaluative conclusion. Some sections may not be developed around topic sentences and may not always support ideas. Conclusion summarizes but does not conclude. |
The review is organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image are relevant to the subject but may not fully engage readers. Thesis statement identifies criteria and the evaluative conclusion. Most sections are well-ordered, developed around topic sentences, and support ideas. Conclusion may be more of a summary. |
The review is logically organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image engage readers and is relevant to the subject. engages readers and is relevant to the subject. Thesis statement identifies criteria and the evaluative conclusion. Well-ordered sections are developed around topic sentences and advance ideas. Conclusion provides strong call-to-action for readers. |
|
Paper Format |
10% |
The template may not be used. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; little or no in-text citations and/or entries on reference page used; major documentation oversights noted; major format errors and omissions noted; inappropriate number of required sources used. |
The template may not be used appropriately. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; missing more than one citation and/or reference entry; significant documentation oversights noted; significant format errors or omissions noted; inappropriate number of required sources used. |
The template may not be used fully. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; missing one in-text citation and/or reference entry; minor documentation oversights noted; minor formatting errors or omissions noted; appropriate number of required sources are used. |
The template is used appropriately. All information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page that they appear and are listed on the references page (APA format); some minor errors or omissions in format noted; appropriate number of required sources is used. |
The template is used appropriately. All information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited in parenthetical APA format; all sources are listed on the references page (APA format); all citations and reference entries are complete and in alphabetical order; appropriate number of required sources is used. |
|
Language Use and Style |
10% |
Voice and tone are inappropriate and ineffective in creating appropriate mood. Inappropriate word choice used. Sentence structure includes ungrammatical structures and no variety. Writing is wordy. |
Voice and tone are inappropriate and ineffective in creating appropriate mood. Word choice fails in use of appropriate, precise language and strong verbs. Includes too many “to be” verbs. No attempt to vary sentence structure noted. Writing is wordy. |
Voice & tone usually do not characterize ideas appropriately or effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice may include nonstandard outdated usage, and may lack of active verbs, concrete language, and precise words. Some slang or jargon exists in the paper. Inadequate variety in sentence structure noted. Writing is wordy. |
Voice & tone usually characterize ideas effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice usually includes current standard usage, active verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words. Some slang or jargon exists in the paper. Some variety of sentence structures strengthens the ideas, creates vitality, and avoids choppiness in the writing. Writing is mostly concise. |
Voice & tone characterize ideas and effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice includes current standard usage, active verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words. Sentence structures strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing. Writing is concise. |
|
Grammar and Mechanics |
10% |
Demonstrates no control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Many errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates minimal control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Several errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates reasonable control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Some errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates high control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Few errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates outstanding control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. No errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.