EDMG503Wk7
Emergency Operations Centers: The
Ultimate Command Posts
As emergency response agencies realize the efficiencies of the Incident Management System
(IMS), more emphasis is being placed on the tools required to effectively manage. Emergency
operations centers (EOCs) are nothing new; in fact, they date back to the days of the Cold War
and Civil Defense. And while earlier versions were fairly sparse and called into play for natural
disasters or threat of war, today's generation of facilities is as diverse as the variety of
emergencies faced by the fire service.
September 16, 2009
0
Tweet
Share
As emergency response agencies realize the efficiencies of the Incident Management System
(IMS), more emphasis is being placed on the tools required to effectively manage. Emergency
operations centers (EOCs) are nothing new; in fact, they date back to the days of the Cold War
and Civil Defense. And while earlier versions were fairly sparse and called into play for natural
disasters or threat of war, today's generation of facilities is as diverse as the variety of
emergencies faced by the fire service. Just as command posts can range from a hastily
requisitioned storefront to a 40-foot air-conditioned specialized vehicle, EOCs run the gamut
from a convertible class or conference room to an entire stand-alone structure specially designed
to offset local hazards.
The size and composition of most EOCs is dictated by both the local emergency management
structure and local conditions. Communities in hurricane-prone regions often have large facilities
designed to weather the storms. Those in areas hosting nuclear power plants may subscribe to a
completely different set of guidelines, while smaller rural communities will likely have facilities
more reflective of their challenges. Regardless of their size, there are universal concerns that
must be addressed when establishing and planning an emergency operations center.
Perhaps the most basic questions are "Why do we need one?" and "When will it be activated?"
The short answer to the first query is that every community, regardless of size, location and
makeup can face an incident that requires a significant amount of off-site coordination. Here, a
much broader assessment of local needs will be done that includes all predictable generic events,
the potential extent of these events and the identification of the resources that will be mobilized
to manage them. In this context, the term "resources" includes personnel as well as fixed or
mobile assets that must be on site to assist with this management. The hazards and potential
scenarios identified during this process provide the answers to the second half of the question.
Intelligence gathering and sharing is the prime function of any emergency operations center. Any
design must provide all required agencies with a place at the table and a mechanism for
information management. Obviously, public safety radios are a prime means of both receiving
and disseminating information. Where the EOC is co-located with the 911 public safety
answering point (PSAP), this may involve nothing more than the addition of a few consoles or
control sets to the existing electronics. For stand-alone facilities, a more robust approach will be
required. The nature of emergency management also dictates that communications involve more
than just fire, police and emergency medical services, but local government and, in some cases,
private industry as well. This is especially true where utilities are not managed by the
municipality.
Mutual aid channels that provide contact with neighboring communities can supplant local
frequencies and space for amateur radio operators are common additions. Depending on regional
hazards, special hotlines or ring-down circuits can also be installed to provide direct connection
to critical facilities. Access to data is essential, and this can take many forms. Material Data
Safety Sheets (MSDS) and Title Three records may be stored in hard copy or obtained online,
and there is a wide variety of software that can assist in plotting plume releases, and even sharing
information within the EOC. Cable TV monitors are also a prime source of up-to-the-minute
reporting and represent a portion of an exploding video trend.
According to Jeffrey Winbourne of the Washington, DC-based consulting firm Winbourne &
Costas Inc., "The use of video is growing and the number of cameras available to feed the EOC
is increasing. This leads to several considerations related to video, which we didn't have just a
few years ago. To take advantage of the growth in video usage, three operational components are
to be considered: camera field deployment that provides the ability to get video where you need
it — either from a mobile unit or fixed cameras; an analytical capability to determine what video
to display to the decision makers in the EOC; and the EOC displays themselves."
Another factor not considered until recently is the potential for virtualization. With the advent of
VoIP (voice over Internet provider) and RoIP (radio over Internet provider), significant
connectivity and capability can be offered to individuals offsite. While this may reduce space
requirements, there is still some concern regarding security if the public World Wide Web is
used as a carrier and there is no replacement for the synergy gained from everyone being located
in the same room.
Security is obviously an important factor, and this involves several aspects. The building must be
protected from unauthorized entry as well as from a predictable level of attack. A comprehensive
system that includes setbacks, fencing, cameras and access control is required. Construction
materials also play a part here, with reinforced concrete and ballistic glass helping to provide
higher levels of safety. This safety deals not only with manmade threats, but with the weather, as
well. Regardless of their location, facilities should be designed to meet or exceed the highest
historical wind speed. Space must also be allocated for security personnel on site, as credential
screening will normally be required during an activation.
But space for security is but one small portion of the entire floor plan. Sufficient room is needed
for all operational personnel and support systems. Every agency expected to be represented in
the EOC requires, at the minimum, tables and chairs as well as access to critical information and
command and control systems. Additionally, conference rooms — both large and small — allow
for sidebar meetings to occur away from the main operational floor. Restrooms, kitchens and
break rooms must be sized to support a full-scale mobilization, and thought should be given to
dormitory rooms if staff is to be sequestered for an appreciable amount of time. Dependent on
these scenarios, specialty rooms can be dedicated, or can be used for different functions during
non-emergencies.
Regardless of the layout, it is clear that sufficient space is required, not only for today's needs;
but for the needs of tomorrow as well. In researching this article, the author spoke to several
emergency management personnel who — although they occupied relatively new facilities —
were already feeling the squeeze. The lack of storage and insufficient expansion offices were
common complaints. Experience too points to the need for sufficient room to work. A report
released by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the wake of the I-35 bridge
collapse in Minneapolis had high praise for local officials, but bore critical statements
concerning the emergency operations center. Some participants felt that it was too small to
accommodate the responding public and public safety officials.
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is another important consideration. Systems
must be sized to properly handle the load of maximum occupancy and take into account
specialized equipment needs as well as the heat generated by the equipment itself. Besides the
obvious creature comforts, there is a need for redundancy, or at least some form of backup in
critical areas. Occasionally, this can be accomplished by zoning and providing secondary units
for every other zone that has interconnecting ductwork. Tying in the HVAC to the fire-alarm
system is another requirement, especially in areas using inert gas extinguishing agents. Failure to
provide such a shutoff will dissipate the agent before it reaches an effective concentration.
The method of air handling also has a measurable impact on the survivability of the facility or,
more correctly, the occupants. At the least, air intakes should be located away from public view
and access to prevent tampering. The ability to exclude outside air is another desirable feature.
High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters remove the majority of particulates from the
atmosphere, and positive-pressure systems that operate in the same fashion as breathing
apparatus cause air to flow from inside the facility out. This is particularly useful during a
chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) event.
While the need for emergency power goes without saying, an analysis of the local power grid is
also in order. Is the proposed site provided with reliable electrical service? Does an alternate
route from another substation exist or can one be provided? Are fiber or high-capacity telephone
circuits in place? If they are not, what is the cost to do so?
Locating away from hazards is desirable, but there are also drawbacks associated with more
remote locations. The greater the distance to the primary telephone company central office, the
greater the exposure to accidental (or intentional) cable damage, especially if the service is above
ground. A bunker in the wilderness may provide the ultimate in protection, but it may add time
to the activation schedule due to travel distances. Inclement weather can also create accessibility
issues for both staff and needed deliveries. If the fuel truck cannot get there during the storm, the
diesel generator may run dry during an extended operation.
There are numerous considerations that will have an impact on facility design. The first series of
responses will help determine the location of the EOC. Using the previous examples, flood-prone
communities are ill advised to build within the flood plain itself, and those protecting nuclear
plants do so best outside the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ). More common
considerations are the avoidance of fixed and mobile hazardous materials, suggesting
construction somewhere other than an industrial area or close to an interstate highway or railroad
freight line.
Of course, in addition to the ideal conditions, reality must also be factored in. Relationships with
existing operations such as the dispatch center need to be considered, as does the current
ownership of a site that may be less than perfect. A large building with room for a tower,
roadway setbacks and sufficient surface parking is going to require a commensurately sized lot
— a fact that may severely limit the choices.
Finally, concern must be shown for environmental issues. Not only should the building be energy
efficient, but efforts should be made to reduce its impact through means such as the utilization of
local materials and the introduction of recycled goods. The National Green Building Council has
developed a rating system for buildings that exhibit Leadership in Energy Efficient Design
(LEED) as a way to gauge the effectiveness of conservation measures incorporated into the
construction.
Like any fire service tool, an emergency operations center must be regularly exercised in order to
build proficiency in its use. However, like any tool, it must be properly designed to perform the
function desired. With careful attention to detail, and the integration of modern construction
practices and technology, EOCs can become valuable assets for successfully managing a wide
range of events.
BARRY FUREY, a Firehouse® contributing editor, is director of the Raleigh-Wake Emergency
Communications Center in North Carolina. During his 35-year public safety career, he has
managed 911 centers and served as a volunteer fire officer in three other states. In 2002, Furey
chaired the Association of Public-safety Communications Officials (APCO) International
conference in Nashville, TN, and in 2005 he received an APCO life membership for his
continued work in emergency communications.