Subject: re : research and development charges to gpg
vera :
in studying the below information , if i am understanding it correctly , only
$ 199 . 7 was to be reversed back to the research group and it should
have occurred in july . do you not notice this entry either ?
please let me know .
thanks !
shirley crenshaw
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by shirley crenshaw / hou / ect on 08 / 11 / 2000
10 : 08 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
vince j kaminski
08 / 10 / 2000 02 : 25 pm
to : vera apodaca / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect , shirley crenshaw / hou / ect @ ect , pinnamaneni
krishnarao / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : research and development charges to gpg
vera ,
we shall talk to the accounting group about the correction .
vince
08 / 09 / 2000 03 : 26 pm
vera apodaca @ enron
vera apodaca @ enron
vera apodaca @ enron
08 / 09 / 2000 03 : 26 pm
08 / 09 / 2000 03 : 26 pm
to : pinnamaneni krishnarao / hou / ect @ ect
cc : vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect
subject : research and development charges to gpg
per mail dated june 15 from kim watson , there was supposed to have occurred
a true - up of $ 274 . 7 in july for the fist six months of 2000 . reviewing july
actuals , i was not able to locate this entry . would you pls let me know
whether this entry was made , if not , when do you intend to process it .
thanks .