580-small group instruction

profileNicole36
ELM-580-RS-T1-PlanningReadingInstruction2.docx

Planning Reading Instruction

Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction

Approach

Description of Approach

Reading Workshop

The reading workshop is a student-focused teaching model which integrates a short teacher-led mini-lesson with the extended independent reading and one-on-one conferencing. There is self-selection of the reading level texts by students and specific feedback given by the teacher. This approach builds reading stamina, intrinsic motivation, and self-regulated reading strategies (Achmad et al., 2024).

Literature Circles

Literature circles are small, student-directed discussion groups where each member of the group performs a given reading role, like a discussion leader, summarizer, or connector. Everyone in the group uses the same text and comes together to exchange ideas. This form of collaboration facilitates critical thinking, peer responsibility, and enhanced understanding of literary and informational texts (Ma et al., 2023).

Whole-Class Reading of a Core Book

During whole-class reading, which is the reading of an essential book, the whole class reads a single text and reads it together. The teacher of the group helps in the shared reading experiences by using think alouds, structured discussion and guided questioning. Such a strategy develops a shared literary ground and enables the teacher to explicitly model the strategies of understanding in a common context that may support all learners (Duke & Cartwright, 2021).

Part 2: Reading Standards and Learning Objectives

Literature

Standard

Learning Objectives

4th Grade: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions).

Students will describe a character from a narrative text by identifying and recording at least three specific details about the character's thoughts, words, or actions in a character analysis graphic organizer, with 80% accuracy.

8th Grade: Analyze how differences in the points of view of the characters and the audience or reader (e.g., created through the use of dramatic irony) create such effects as suspense or humor.

Students will look at how character and reader point of view difference can generate suspense or humor by writing a structured paragraph in which they identify two or more examples of dramatic irony and describe their impact on the reader.

Informational

Standard

Learning Objectives

4th Grade: Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text.

Students will describe at least two events or concepts of an informational text by saying what and why using specific evidence taken directly out of the text in a written answer of at least three sentences,

8th Grade: Determine an author's point of view, perspective and purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints.

Students will identify the point of view and the purpose of the author of an informational text and justify how the author manages to engage at least one of the conflicting perspectives and provide at least two textual evidences in a written analysis paragraph.

Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson

Grade Level

4th Grade

National/State Reading Standard

Identify one of the reading standards from Part 2 that will be the focus of the lesson. Standards must align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments.

CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.4.3: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text.

Text: Charlotte's Web by E.B. White (Chapter 3: Escape)

Specific Learning Target(s)/Objective(s)

Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards.

Students will be in a position to explain the personality of Wilbur in Charlotte Web by noting and listing at least three definite textual details about his thoughts, words, or deeds with 80% accuracy using a character analysis graphic organizer at the end of this lesson.

Whole Group Lesson

Explain how information will be presented to students and describe activities you will use to engage students in practicing and applying the learning target/objective before reading, during reading, and after reading the core text.

Pre-Reading:

At the beginning of the lesson, the teacher shows the students a handful of pictures of farm settings and questions them about what they know or have heard about farms. This triggers prior knowledge and develops a mental structure of the text. It is then followed by the introduction of the essential vocabulary (runt, escape, slop) by the teacher with a visual vocabulary chart on a board, simple definitions, simple pictures. In small groups, students tell us in a few words what they believe the chapter could be about, based on the title and the image we see on the cover of the book. The teacher sets a clear reading purpose: "As we read, we will pay close attention to what Wilbur thinks, says, and does, so we can describe who he really is." This will relate directly to the learning goal and will equip the students to read with a narrowed mind (Duke and Cartwright, 2021).

During Reading:

The teacher reads the chapter aloud and students go through the chapter in their own copies. After every few paragraphs, the teacher pauses to model a think-aloud: "I notice that Wilbur says he doesn't want to stay in his pigpen. This tells me something about his character." Students are then asked to make notes on their own text with sticky notes or text coding symbols (T = thought, W = word, A = action) to help highlight important information about Wilbur. This facilitated annotation approach promotes active learning and develops understanding. The class stops halfway to have a short turn-and-talk session, during which students tell one thing they have discovered so far. The teacher moves around, overhears and where necessary offer correctional feedback.

Post-Reading:

The students will continue reading and then complete a character analysis graphic organer independently and add at least three details about Wilbur in categories: Thoughts, Words and Actions. The class will then unite to create a joint anchor chart filled with student-supplied information. On their organizers, the students write a short paragraph about the character of Wilbur. The teacher engages the entire group in a discussion through open-ended questions like, What do Wilbur actions say about the way Wilbur feels? The post-reading stage assists students in solidifying and using the skill of character description in writing, the core of the standard (Achmad et al., 2024).

Differentiation

Explain strategies to differentiate the whole group lesson to support each group of students.

English Language Learners (ELLs): ELL learners are provided with bilingual vocabulary card having essential words of a chapter and their translation. They are assigned a supportive peer during the turn-and-talk portion and a partially completed graphic organizer with one example detail already filled in. Sentence frames are available for writing: "Wilbur shows that he is ___ when he ___." The scaffolding will enable ELL students to receive the same grade-level content and minimize language barriers (Ma et al., 2023).

Students with DISabilities: Students with IEPs or 504 plans have an audio recording of the chapter to listen to as they follow the text. Their graphic organer has only two details (instead of three) and contains some icons of visual prompts next to each category. Further guided prompting is given by the teacher or paraprofessional with the annotation and writing. Extended time is available if needed for the post-reading written paragraph.

Gifted Ability Students: Advanced learners will be challenged to do more than identify and compare two characters: Wilbur and Fern. They fill out a two-column character analysis organizer and write a comparison paragraph describing how the two characters differ in their reactions to the same situation. They are also asked to find out how the author uses detailing of character to bring out theme.

Early Finishers: Students who complete early are provided with an extension card that makes them select a favorite Wilbur detail and form a short illustrated journal entry in the first person as Wilbur, utilizing textual evidence to substantiate their depiction. This fosters creativity and strengthens the standard.

Assessment

Explain one formative assessment that will be used to gauge student learning throughout the lesson that provides meaningful feedback. Additionally, provide a summative assessment to be used at the end of the lesson to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery of the learning target/objective.

Formative Assessment: The teacher provides continuous formative assessment during the lesson. In the turn and talk part, the teacher moves around and overhears students talk, and writes down whether they are recalling character details correctly. In the concluding phase of the During Reading, students will provide a sticky note exit ticket with a character detail they discovered and the category it falls under (thought, word, or action). This fast-check will enable the teacher to determine the students, who require further help, before they proceed to independent writing.

Summative Assessment: Students submit their completed character analysis graphic organizer and the written paragraph at the end of the lesson. They are evaluated on a teacher-created rubric that is pertinent to RL.4.3. The rubric will assess: (1) the number of specific textual details (minimum 3), (2) the correct classification of those details as either thoughts, words, or actions, and (3) the skill to write the character based on those details. Scores are used to plan future instruction and determine grouping for follow-up small-group lessons.

References

Achmad, D., Suyitno, S., Murtono, M., & Ardiansyah, A. (2024). Differentiated instruction in reading in elementary schools: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.27134

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Ma, L., Ismail, L., & Saharuddin, N. (2023). Effectiveness of literature circles in developing English language reading ability: A systematic review. English Language Teaching, 16(7), 47–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n7p47

© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

image1.jpeg