570-Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning in Science and Health
2
ELM-570 Science Unit Plan
Topic 2: Planning a Science Unit with the End in Mind
Grade: 3
Unit Theme: Weather and Climate Patterns
Part 1: Standards, Learning Objectives, and Assessments
|
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
|
Lesson Title and Brief Summary
|
Introduction to Weather Students identify common types of weather, discuss daily weather conditions, and begin maintaining a weather journal through classroom observations. |
Weather Tools and Data Collection Students investigate weather instruments, collect weather measurements, and record observations using scientific tools. |
Understanding Severe Weather Students explore severe weather events, examine weather hazards, and identify appropriate safety procedures using evidence-based discussions. |
Comparing Weather and Climate Students analyze weather data collected throughout the week and compare weather patterns with climate characteristics from different regions. |
Becoming a Meteorologist, Students synthesize their learning by creating and presenting a weather forecast using evidence gathered throughout the unit. |
|
National/State Standard(s)
|
NGSS 3-ESS2-1: Use tables and graphs to display data from the seasons and discuss the typical weather conditions of each. NGSS 3-ESS2-2: Obtain and use information to describe the climate of various regions in the world. NGSS 3-ESS3-1: Make a claim about the merit of a design solution that reduces the impacts of a weather-related hazard. |
||||
|
Learning Objectives
|
Students will identify at least five types of weather and record daily weather observations with 90% accuracy. |
Students will describe the purpose of three weather instruments and measure weather data accurately during classroom investigations. |
Students will explain the causes of severe weather and identify at least four weather safety procedures. |
Students will compare and contrast weather and climate using collected evidence and a graphic organizer. |
Students will develop and present a weather forecast using scientific vocabulary and weather data with at least 80% proficiency. |
|
Three-Dimensional Learning
|
Over the course of the unit, students follow three paths toward the three dimensions of science learning, utilizing disciplinary core ideas on weather and climate and weather hazards, crosscutting ideas, and practices of science and engineering. Students plan and conduct investigations, analyze and interpret data, construct explanations, obtain and communicate information, and engage in evidence-based discussions using the science and engineering practices. Students make crosscutting observations throughout the week about Patterns, Cause and Effect, Stability and Change, and Systems and System Models as they gather weather data, learn about weather instruments, analyze weather data, make predictions about weather and climate, and make weather forecasts. |
||||
|
Formative Assessment
|
Teacher observation checklist, weather journal entries, and exit ticket identifying weather types. |
Observation during weather investigations, weather instrument matching activity, partner discussions, and teacher questioning. |
Think-Pair-Share activity, severe weather safety scenarios, interactive quiz, and exit ticket. |
Weather versus climate Venn diagram, teacher conferencing, and small-group discussions. |
Presentation rehearsal, peer feedback rubric, self-assessment checklist, and teacher observation before the final presentation. |
|
Summative Assessment
|
Students will conduct a Weather Scientist Performance Project, take weekly observations of weather, arrange the data in a table and graph, and compare the weather and climate, using scientific evidence, before presenting a forecast for weather conditions to the class. The presentation will be assessed using a standards-based rubric that scores on: NGSS learning objectives, vocabulary, data analysis, communication skills, use of evidence, and scientific accuracy. |
||||
|
Differentiation of Assessments |
Assessments will be differentiated between formative and summative, with equal opportunities for all learners. Where appropriate, extended time, graphic organizers, simplified directions, oral response options, teacher-guided small group instruction, and assistive technology will be provided to students with disabilities. A variety of visual vocabulary cards, bilingual materials, sentence frames, collaborative practice, and the opportunity to prove mastery via verbal performance will be employed to assist English language learners. Students will use additional weather data, media technology, and historical weather events to extend their learning to create their final weather forecast presentations, in the case of the gifted student. For early finishers, activities will be tailored to enhance pupils' profile comparisons of the climates of different regions, additional weather graphs, investigations of extreme weather events, or activities that are aligned to the unit learning outcomes. |
Part 2: Reflection
|
Topic 2 Reflection |
|
The process for this science unit began in the reverse sequence, starting with the daily instruction and working up to meeting the standards and assessments. Prior to designing activities, I first came up with the desired learning outcomes to be achieved, then designed assessments to measure what students had learned, and finally, chose learning activities to reach those learning outcomes. According to Liao and Ringler (2023), backward design makes instructional planning more robust by making it more explicit that learning experiences are designed in a way that supports learning outcomes being assessed. This method does not follow the usual planning process when "getting the kids to plan" was a priority over concern with aligning assessment. The assessments chosen for this unit facilitate the three dimensions of science learning by incorporating each of the disciplinary core ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts in each lesson. For instance, students gather weather data, look for patterns, develop explanations, and share scientific understanding in an authentic presentation on an actual weather forecast. Zhao et al. (2023) emphasize that, by effectively aligning teaching, learning, and assessment, students will develop their capability of implementing scientific knowledge through performance-based tasks instead of solely through testing. In creating assessments, I took into account: alignment with NGSS standards, measurable learning objectives, developmental appropriateness, and opportunities to engage students in multiple ways to demonstrate learning. There are a variety of formative assessments used on an ongoing basis to gather information about students' understanding and make instructional decisions prior to the formal assessment. Liao and Ringler (2023) noted that continuous during-training assessment promotes more deeply thought-provoking learning, as it helps detect misconceptions as they arise and make decisions about teaching and learning. Accommodations designed to ensure an equitable evaluation assessment include visual supports, providing bilingual vocabulary, giving extra time, allowing oral responses, graphic organizers, and flexible groupings. The changes allow students with disabilities and multilingual learners to assess their knowledge according to academic requirements. According to Zhao et al. (2023), integration of Assessment practices with the learners' diversities enhances engagement, meaningful participation, and academic achievement at a suitable academic standard. |
Topic 3: Instructional Strategies that Engage Students in Science Content
Part 1: Vocabulary, Instructional Strategies, and Lesson Activities
|
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
|
Vocabulary
|
Weather, forecast, temperature, precipitation, observation, cloudy, sunny, windy. Vocabulary will be introduced using picture cards, an interactive word wall, teacher modelling, and student discussion. |
Thermometer, rain gauge, anemometer, measurement, data, record. Students will learn vocabulary through demonstrations with weather tools, labelled diagrams, hands-on practice, and vocabulary journals. |
Thunderstorm, tornado, hurricane, flood, lightning, safety, hazard. Vocabulary will be taught using videos, photographs, real-world examples, and cooperative discussions. |
Climate, region, pattern, season, compare, evidence. Students will use graphic organizers, anchor charts, reading passages, and collaborative activities to reinforce vocabulary. |
Meteorologist, analysis, conclusion, prediction, evidence, presentation. Vocabulary will be reinforced through student presentations, peer discussions, and review games. |
|
Instructional Strategy/Strategies |
Direct instruction, think-pair-share, cooperative learning, and guided observation. |
Inquiry-Based Learning: Students investigate weather tools through hands-on exploration, small-group experiments, and teacher facilitation. |
Inquiry-Based Learning: Students analyze severe weather scenarios, investigate safety solutions, and construct explanations using evidence. |
Graphic organizers, collaborative learning, guided discussion, and data analysis. |
Project-based learning, student presentations, peer evaluation, and reflective discussion. |
|
Summary of Instruction and Activities
|
The lesson begins by activating prior knowledge through a class discussion about students' daily weather experiences. Students observe current weather conditions outside, record observations in weather journals, classify weather types, and discuss how weather affects daily activities. |
Students examine weather instruments at learning stations and investigate how each tool measures different weather conditions. Working collaboratively, students collect classroom weather data, record observations, and compare findings while drawing evidence-based conclusions. |
Students investigate severe weather through photographs, videos, and case studies. Working in small groups, they analyze weather hazards, identify safety procedures, and design classroom weather safety plans supported by scientific evidence. |
Students analyze weather records collected throughout the week and compare them with climate information from different regions. Students complete Venn diagrams, interpret graphs, and explain differences between weather and climate using supporting evidence. |
Students synthesize their learning by creating and presenting weather forecasts using data collected during the unit. They explain weather patterns, justify predictions with evidence, answer classmates' questions, and reflect on their learning. |
|
Differentiation and Accommodations
|
Provide visual supports, sentence stems, guided notes, bilingual vocabulary cards, flexible grouping, and oral response options. Gifted students extend learning by researching unusual weather events. Early finishers complete weather puzzles and journal extensions. |
Students with disabilities receive teacher-guided instruction, simplified recording sheets, and adapted weather tools. ELLs work with peer partners and illustrated vocabulary. Gifted students compare multiple weather instruments and analyze additional data. Early finishers graphed and collected weather data independently. |
Provide visual safety charts, closed-captioned videos, small-group instruction, graphic organizers, and oral presentation options. Gifted students research historical severe weather events. Early finishers design emergency preparedness posters. |
Students receive completed graphic organizers as needed, bilingual reading supports, teacher conferencing, and flexible grouping. Gifted learners compare climates from additional countries. Early finishers investigate regional climate differences using maps. |
Offer presentation choices such as oral, digital, or visual formats. Students with disabilities may present in small groups or individually. ELLs use sentence frames and visual aids. Gifted students incorporate additional weather research and multimedia elements into their forecasts. |
|
Topic 3 Reflection |
|
Selecting instructional strategies for this unit required careful alignment with the standards, learning objectives, and assessments established through backward design. For each lesson, there are intentional links to the expected learning outcomes and opportunities for students to be active scientists. Inquiry investigations, for instance, we will have about weather instruments and severe weather, making explicit connections to the unit's formative and summative assessments. Strat et al. (2023) explain that the inquiry science approach builds conceptual understanding as students are not engaged in passive activities, but in real science processes. The instructional strategies also provide students with opportunities to explore and investigate, think critically, and solve problems by gathering data, interpreting, and making inferences, as well as exchanging ideas and drawing conclusions. Students are not just memorizing the concepts of weather, but engaging in activities to explore weather phenomena, holding discussions about weather, and applying weather concepts in the real world. Throughout this unit, the learning experiences engage with and reinforce the three-dimensional framework of science education by integrating disciplinary core ideas, crosscutting concepts, and science and engineering practices throughout the unit. As Strat et al. (2023) note, scientific reasoning is achieved with inquiry-based instruction, as it enhances the involvement of students and their problem-solving. Some people think that weather and climate are similar. One may have a problem differentiating weather and climate events, especially the short-term ones. To address this challenge, I would make additional visual comparisons, guided questioning, graphic organizers, and offer repeated opportunities for practice that would involve authentic weather data. Students who need further support will be provided with targeted small group instruction, and those who are multilingual will be offered bilingual vocabulary and visual supports. Evmenova et al. (2024) highlight how evidence-based technology tools, multimedia resources, and differentiated instructional supports enhance access for diverse learners and foster participation that is meaningful for all. Working with the special education teacher, the English language development specialist, and the instructional technology coach would also ensure that all students are able to learn the science content with the aid of the accommodations. |
Topic 4: Creating Meaningful Connections Across Disciplines
Part 1: Materials, Resources, and Integration
|
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
|
Materials and Resources
|
Weather picture cards, weather journals, chart paper, pencils, interactive whiteboard, classroom weather calendar, weather symbols. |
Thermometer, rain gauge, anemometer (or models), clipboards, recording sheets, graph paper, rulers, tablets, or laptops. |
Severe weather safety posters, informational videos, scenario cards, chart paper, markers, emergency preparedness handouts, and a projector. |
Climate maps, regional weather data, Venn diagram graphic organizers, laptops or tablets, colored pencils, and informational texts. |
Student weather journals, computers or tablets, presentation software, projector, presentation rubric, peer evaluation forms, and reflection sheets. |
|
Technology Integration |
The use of technology will be embedded throughout the unit to promote scientific inquiry, collaboration, and communication. Students will use an interactive weather site to view the weather for the day, and will also compare their class observations with the current weather somewhere in the community. Students will be using digital graphing tools and spreadsheet applications to organize and analyze weather data taken from investigations. Students will be supported in the understanding and awareness of severe weather events and weather safety with the use of educational videos, virtual weather simulations, and other multimedia resources. Students will also be able to use presentation programs like Google Slides or Microsoft PowerPoint to produce and present multimedia weather forecasts. Whole class discussions will take place on interactive whiteboards, weather maps will also be displayed on the interactive whiteboards, and the patterns in the weather will be analyzed. These technology tools encourage active participation and enhance the skills of students in gathering, interpreting, analyzing, and communicating scientific information. |
||||
|
Health Integration |
The connection between health concepts is woven throughout the unit by engaging students in learning how weather impacts personal health, their safety, and their daily decisions. Students will be able to identify appropriate clothing for the various weather conditions, learn to make use of water and shade for outdoor observations, and understand the role of weather in physical activity. In the severe weather lesson, students will be taught preparedness skills for emergencies, what to do to ensure safe shelter during severe weather, how to self-regulate their emotions during the emergency, and the importance of following safety instructions to protect themselves and others during the emergency. The conversations will build on healthy lifestyle decisions that assist with good health and support decisions that are appropriate to different weather conditions. |
||||
|
Math Connections |
Integration of mathematics is evident in the unit as it focuses on using measurement, collection of data, graphing, estimation, accuracy, and data analysis. Students will record observations of the weather each day, measure the temperature, organize the data in a tabular format, make bar graphs, determine weather patterns, compare temperature numeric data, and make evidence-based conclusions from graph data. The mathematical practices reinforce students' quantitative reasoning, support scientific investigations, and enable students to report scientific results in terms of accurate numbers. |
||||
|
Literacy |
The unit delves into several aspects of literacy that support science communication. Content knowledge is being developed through reading in the informational text, weather-related text, diagrams, safety articles, and maps on climate. Marketers integrate writing every day in weather journals, recording sheets, graphic organizers, weather safety plans, and weather forecast scripts. When talking, students can describe scientific concepts using the appropriate scientific terminology during cooperative dialogues, questions, discussions, and presentations on the prediction of the weather. Listening skills are practised through the following activities: students listening to discuss answers in class, students listening to understand other students' presentations, students listening while investigating, and students listening to give constructive comments. The activities below promote students' skills to communicate scientific thinking clearly and also help them understand the unit as a whole. |
Part 2: Reflection
|
Topic 4 Reflection |
|
Creating a week-long science unit, where the thrust was the importance of science integration with other subject areas to provide some relevance to students' learning, was very helpful this week. The use of technology was integrated throughout the unit of work, and students will be able to access the current weather data, generate their own digital graphs, use different media sources for investigating severe weather, and produce weather and climate information projections using multimedia. The technological tools amplified students' engagement and were used as an aid to science and engineering practices: Collecting Evidence, Analyzing evidence, and Communicating evidence. Wilson et al. (2025) explain that incorporating inquiry and cross-curricular integration into teaching helps students to enhance their STEM learning when the concepts are tied to real-life phenomena across subject areas. High-order skills across the curriculum were intentionally woven throughout the unit, using mathematics in the areas of measurement, graphing, and data analysis. Literacy skills, on the other hand, were strengthened with informational reading, keeping science journals, joining in conversations, and presentations on science findings. They provide links across disciplines that will help students to apply what they have learned in a variety of contexts, enhancing relevance and the transfer of knowledge. Ayik et al. (2026) emphasize that multiple situated learning experiences with formative instructional practices positively support participation and academic results of diverse learners, especially those who are multilingual learners. Health education was integrated by using teaching methods of sharing with students as to the impact of weather on exercising, drinking water, and selecting suitable clothing, and how weather events can affect emotional state during crises, as well as the severe weather readiness. These experiences help the students to make informed choices that promote their personal safety and healthy lifestyles. Encouraging health education during the teaching of the subject of science is important to enable pupils to be sensitive to the knowledge and application of science, which has a direct impact on their lives and overall health. The chosen materials, resources, and technology provide rich learning opportunities that involve students in learning and inquiry, using a hands-on approach to explore real weather systems, tools, and data. Computer-Formatted materials and technology that provide interactions, collaborative investigations, and multimedia presentations help to motivate students by helping them build knowledge rather than being given knowledge. Wilson et al. (2025) recommend that real-world STEM learning experiences with STEM tech support better student understanding, collaboration, and engagement in the learning. |
References
Ayik, B., Kim, S., Zan, Y., Gu, D., & Kim, W. L. (2026). Supporting multilingual learners in K‐12 STEM classrooms through formative assessments: A qualitative descriptive approach. Natural Sciences Education, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.70048
Evmenova, A., Vermeer, A., Cooney, L., Washburn, J., Jackson, T., & Sulaimon, T. (2024). Evidence-based technology tools to support diverse learners, educators, and service providers across instructional settings. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/bb4d1b5c-a08f-4665-a8ff-bd49c0166952/download
Liao, Y., & Ringler, M. (2023). Backward design: Integrating active learning into undergraduate computer science courses. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2204055
Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
Wilson, M. M., Zafar, F., & Nichol, C. (2025). Fostering Inquiry: The Impact of Cross-Curricular Professional Development on STEM Teacher Practices. Education Sciences, 15(4), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040421
Zhao, L., Zhao, B. & Li, C. Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: how teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 5, 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.