Contextual Factors Digital Flyer

profileMyraliaRose3.
ELM-201Rubric-ContextualFactorsDigitalFlyer.pdf

Contextual Factors Digital Flyer - Rubric

Effects of Contextual Factors 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is thought-

provoking and thorough.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is direct and

logical.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is brief or

somewhat connected.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is unclear or

undeveloped.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is incomplete

or omitted.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Cultures 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are insightful and

original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are descriptive and

credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are basic or overly

simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are illogical or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are unrelated or not

addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Linguistic Needs 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

insightful and original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

descriptive and credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are basic or

overly simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are illogical

or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

unrelated or not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Socioeconomic Statuses 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate instruction and classroom

environments for a classroom of students with diverse socioeconomic statuses are

insightful and original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse socioeconomic statuses are

descriptive and credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse socioeconomic statuses are

basic or overly simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse socioeconomic statuses are

illogical or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse socioeconomic statuses are

unrelated or not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Social Needs 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate instruction and classroom

environments for a classroom of students with diverse social needs are insightful

and original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse social needs are descriptive

and credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse social needs are basic or

overly simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse social needs are illogical or

unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse social needs are unrelated

or not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Utilizing Technology 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student

engagement, motivation, and success, including how they will be adapted for

diverse student needs, are insightful and original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student

engagement, motivation, and success, including how they will be adapted for

diverse student needs, are descriptive and credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student

engagement, motivation, and success that, including how they will be adapted for

diverse student needs, are basic or overly simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student

engagement, motivation, and success that, including how they will be adapted for

diverse student needs, are illogical or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student

engagement, motivation, and success that, including how they will be adapted for

diverse student needs, are unrelated or not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Aesthetic Quality 5 points

Criteria Description

Aesthetic Quality

5. Target 5 points

Design is pleasing. Skillful handling of color, text, and visuals creates a distinctive

and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals

are evident and clearly communicate the purpose of the assignment.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Design is clean. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. A

variety of objects, charts, and graphs are integrated to amplify the message and

promote the purpose of the assignment.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. There is some variation in type size,

color, and layout that is unnecessary. For the most part, visuals add to, not detract,

from the purpose of the assignment.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Design is inconsistent, fragmented, and detrimental to the purpose of the

assignment. Visuals detract from the content.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Design is not appropriate for the content or does not fit the purpose of the

assignment.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources 2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations

and references.

5. Target 2 points

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. No errors in formatting or

documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.7 points

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Appropriate format and

documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.5 points

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Appropriate format and

documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 1.3 points

Supporting research is limited or insufficient. Appropriate format is attempted, but

some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are

evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Supporting research is not included or is irrelevant to the topic. Appropriate format

is not used.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.