Contemp Challenges in Business

pmcclam1982

Element1rubric.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Contemp Challenges in Business

Element 1: SWOT Analysis & Why Pursuing DBA Degree--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents a thorough and detailed explanation of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents a thorough and detailed explanation of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in SWOT analysis or explanation.

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents an explanation with some details of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Few sources or examples support thinking.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 2: Three Goals--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of three goals he/she plans to accomplish as a result of (or in conjunction with) completion of his/her DBA degree. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student presents an explanation with some details of three goals he/she plans to accomplish as a result of (or in conjunction with) completion of his/her DBA degree. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation of three goals he/she plans to accomplish as a result of (or in conjunction with) completion of his/her DBA degree. Few sources or examples support thinking.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 3: Strengths & Challenges Identified--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of at least three personal or professional strengths that will aid him/her in achieving his/her goals and at least three challenges that might prevent him/her from reaching his/her goals. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student presents an explanation with some details of at least three personal or professional strengths that will aid him/her in achieving his/her goals and some details of at least three challenges that might prevent him/her from reaching his/her goals. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of at least three personal or professional strengths that will aid him/her in achieving his/her goals and/or vague or missing details of at least three challenges that might prevent him/her from reaching his/her goals. Few sources or examples support thinking.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 4: Preparedness of Achieving DBA Goal--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed assessment of how prepared he/she is to overcome these challenges, including any strategies he/she has developed or resources he/she may draw on to help him/her achieve his/her goals. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student presents an assessment with some details of how prepared he/she is to overcome these challenges, including some strategies he/she has developed or resources he/she may draw on to help him/her achieve his/her goals. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete assessment of how prepared he/she is to overcome these challenges, and/or includes few, if any, strategies he/she has developed or resources he/she may draw on to help him/her achieve his/her goals. Few sources or examples support thinking.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 5: Global Change Agent to Effect Positive Social Change--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of why earning his/her DBA degree can create opportunities for him/her as a global change agent to devise solutions to complex business problems and to effect positive social change in the world and/or in his/her community. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student presents an explanation with some details of why earning his/her DBA degree can create opportunities for him/her as a global change agent to devise solutions to complex business problems and to effect positive social change in the world and/or in his/her community. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague details of why earning his/her DBA degree can create opportunities for him/her as a global change agent to devise solutions to complex business problems and to effect positive social change in the world and/or in his/her community. Few sources or examples support thinking.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 6: Critical Thinking--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 30 (30%) points

Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments.

Excellent Criteria 28.5 (28.5%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 25.5 (25.5%) points

Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly.

Marginal Criteria 22.5 (22.5%) points

Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the classroom experiences and content; nor analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments are not exhibited.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 15 (15%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 7: Written Delivery Style & Grammar--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 8: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Element 1: SWOT Analysis & Why Pursuing DBA Degree--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents a thorough and detailed explanation of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Several sources and examples support thinking.

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Student describes results of personal SWOT analysis and presents an explanation with some details of why he/she is pursing a doctoral degree. Some sources and examples support thinking.

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 2: Three Goals--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 3: Strengths & Challenges Identified--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 4: Preparedness of Achieving DBA Goal--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 5: Global Change Agent to Effect Positive Social Change--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 8 (8%) points

Excellent Criteria 7.6 (7.6%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 6.8 (6.8%) points

Marginal Criteria 6 (6%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 4 (4%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 6: Critical Thinking--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 30 (30%) points

Excellent Criteria 28.5 (28.5%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 25.5 (25.5%) points

Marginal Criteria 22.5 (22.5%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 15 (15%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 7: Written Delivery Style & Grammar--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points

Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points

Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Feedback:

Element 8: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)--

Levels of Achievement:

Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points

Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points

Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points

Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points

Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

0.0680000

0.0760000

0.3000000

30 <span class='r

0.2850000

28.5 <span class=

0.2550000

25.5 <span class=

0.2250000

7.6 <span class='

22.5 <span class=

0.1500000

15 <span class='r

0.1425000

14.25 <span class

0.1275000

12.75 <span class

0.1125000

11.25 <span class

0.0750000

0.0680000

7.5 <span class='

0.1425000

0.1125000

6.8 <span class='

0.0800000

0.0760000

0.0600000

0.0800000

6 <span class='ra

0.0600000

0.0400000

4 <span class='ra

0.2550000

0.0000000

0 <span class='ra

0.0800000

0.0000000

0.0800000

0.0760000

8 <span class='ra

0.0680000