Unit III Scholarly Activity

1

What is the Impact of Training on Employee Productivity?

Students Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Professor’s Name

Date

What is the Impact of Training on Employee Productivity?

Most existing entities have a department dealing with Human resources. The output of a business is related to the skills employed. Human labor is highly flexible in terms of quality. In other words, the level of knowledge in any worker is adjustable. Training improves both the worker and the business.

Understanding the role of training the workforce will help business people shape their decisions. Management that invests in training its workforce records higher performance. Many times, skilled labor lacks the specifications unique to running an organization. Training makes a qualified worker more productive. It also builds the capacity of the semiskilled workforce to competent levels.

When human resource managers get to know the value of training, productivity and diversity can upscale. In the very hiring stage, the bar gets adjusted to accommodate laborers with the potential to gain a skill. Organizations ought to invest in policies that can help training by introducing clear details outlined in manuals (Badhu and Saxena, 1999). They noted that the changing economic dimensions demanded complex banking services and recommended training employees to balance the gap of higher expectations.

The organizational workforce comprises diverse persons who acquired skills in different environments and were guided in different ways. That means that though two people may have similar qualifications in terms of academic achievements, their expertise when delivering will most likely differ. Their approach to circumstances may be different, but training comes in as an equalizer.

Many studies have proved that training the workforce is a venture that positively contributes to productivity. The activity happens as an expense at the time of delivery which the employer must meet. Returns reflect on the output as a continuous practice rather than a one-time gain. Many corporations, banks, factories, and organizations are adopting a training culture on staffing. In return, frustrations from underperforming workers have been considerably lowered. Managers who go the extra mile of investing much in training have registered higher achievements than cheap training (Ramu, 2006).

According to Purohit (2012), Training equips workers with knowledge in their job fields. The study's goal was to assess the effect of training on workers' execution of duties and fulfillment of customers. They used existing policies of running cooperative banks to commend human resource practices of training the workforce. They did Personal interviews through questionnaires around the Pune region. The research used a sample of Sixteen banks, and thirty employees responded. They noted that frequent and deep training promotes productivity.

Some of the reasons that necessitate training include a desire for personal growth, customer complaints, and new work policies in organizations, among others. However, the development of a business is determined by many factors. It is important to mention that leadership organization plays a major role in the success of a business. The strategies management adopts and decisions they make to harmonize all production factors determine an organization's productivity. Competent management can utilize available resources to maximize profits and minimize losses.

References

Sal, A., & Raja, M. (2016). The impact of training and development on employees performance and productivity. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 5(7).

Zwick, T. (2006). The impact of training intensity on establishment productivity. Industrial relations: a journal of economy and society, 45(1), 26-46.