|
|
|
|
| EFE Matrix |
|
|
|
|
| IFE Matrix |
|
|
|
|
| Key External Factors |
Weight |
Rating |
Weighted Score |
|
| Key Internal Factors |
Weight |
Rating |
Weighted Score |
|
|
|
|
| Opportunities |
|
|
|
|
| Strengths |
|
|
|
| 5 |
1. The increase in climate change increases the demand for innovation and technology in handling environmental projects |
0.04 |
4 |
0.16 |
|
| 1 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
2. Partnerships with other companies are required in enhancing adoption of sustainable projects. |
0.07 |
2 |
0.14 |
|
| 2 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
3. The growth of new markets in different parts of the industry enhances the ability of the company to enhance its performance. |
0.08 |
4 |
0.32 |
|
| 3 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
4. The changing policies in different sectors show that the company should prepare for changes in the governance priorities since many governments are focusing on climate change. |
0.07 |
2 |
0.14 |
|
| 4 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
5. WSP has benefited from the taxation policies where it has enjoyed the lower tax rates in the some of the nations. This has resulted to an increase in the company profits and spending in aspects of technology research and development. |
0.05 |
2 |
0.10 |
|
| 5 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 6 |
6. The changes in societal norms and hierarchy has increased the societal attitude towards the environmental friendly projects. |
0.03 |
3 |
0.09 |
|
| 6 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
7. The increase in the demand for access to essential services over the last decade has resulted to wider demand for essential services provided by WSP. The governments have increased the investments in public services and this is an opportunity for revenue growth for WSP. |
0.08 |
3 |
0.24 |
|
| 7 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
8. WSP can optimize the digital asset data in the transport and infrastructure sector to enhance the performance of the company in the industries and to improve revenue performance |
0.06 |
2 |
0.12 |
|
| 8 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 7 |
9. Technological advancements can be used to avoid bridge failures by effective transmission of data on structural integrity. |
0.02 |
2 |
0.04 |
|
| 10 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
|
| Threats |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
| 7 |
1. The changes in environmental norms are altering the priorities on the service innovation. The services need to be designed in line with the environmental standards and the company has to keep up with the changes in environmental standards. |
0.02 |
2 |
0.04 |
|
| 1 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
2. The downward pressure on tight budget due to inflation rates has reduced the profit margian and hence negatively affecting the revenue. |
0.08 |
2 |
0.16 |
|
| 2 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
3. The increased liquidity rate in the market has resulted to a rise of inflation in the world economy and thus negatively affects the clients' spending on major projects. |
0.08 |
3 |
0.24 |
|
| 3 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 6 |
4. The growing regulatory standards for some areas increases the need for adherence to strict policy compliance, such as waste management especially in the urban areas. |
0.03 |
3 |
0.09 |
|
| 5 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
5. The US-China trade wars have negatively impacted the company performance due to supply-chain disruptions. |
0.07 |
2 |
0.14 |
|
| 6 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
6. The fluctuations in the foreign exchange and the currency impacts WSP’s net earnings and overall performance. |
0.05 |
2 |
0.10 |
|
| 7 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
7. The recruitment of skilled and qualified engineers and scientists to deliver efficient projects is becoming an increasing challenge in the company. |
0.1 |
3 |
0.30 |
|
| 8 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
8. The company is subject to complex public and procurement laws and regulations which makes the procurement process more complex and difficult. |
0.06 |
2 |
0.12 |
|
| 9 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
9. The rising privacy and cybersecurity risks increases the risk of successful cyber threats. The data privacy and cybersecurity laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation must be adhered to. |
0.01 |
2 |
0.02 |
|
| 10 |
|
| - 0 |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
1 |
| 2.56 |
|
| Total |
0 |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| All the weights must add up to 1.00, and no weight > 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
| All the weights must add up to 1.00, and no weight > 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
| Ratings: |
4 = Company response is superior |
|
|
|
| Ratings*: |
1 = Major weakness |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 = Company respone is above average |
|
|
|
|
| 2 = Minor weakness |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 = Company response is average |
|
|
|
|
| 3 = Minor strength |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 = Company response is poor |
|
|
|
|
| 4 = Major strength |
|
|
|
|
| Weighted Scores range from 1.0 to 4.0; anything |
|
|
|
|
| Weighted Scores range from 1.0 to 4.0; anything |
|
|
|
|
|
| < 2.5 (the midpoint) is a problem. |
|
|
|
|
| < 2.5 (the midpoint) is a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Above 2.5 is starting to look good. |
|
|
|
|
| Above 2.5 is starting to look good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *Note: The weight assigned to a given factor indicates the relative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| importance of the factor to being successful in the firm’s industry. |
tuotuo
EFEandIFEMatrices.xlsx
