Assignment

profileiMozzie
EECS4460.79.5.19.pptx

Power System Management

EECS 4460/5460-901

Lecture #7

Power Generation Alternatives

1

Fundamentals in Power Generation – Electricity is a Secondary Source of Energy

Electricity from Direct Energy Conversion

Electricity Production from a Direct Source

Naturally replenishing but flow-limited energy resource

Virtually inexhaustible in duration but limited in terms of the amount of energy per unit of time

Examples: Hydro Plants, Solar Cells, Wind Turbines

Electricity from Thermal Energy Conversion

Electricity Production from the conversion of a heat source

Heat source is non renewable - fossil or nuclear fuel

Fuel is directly injected into a combustion turbine or into a boiler to create steam to rotate turbine/generator

Examples: Coal, Nuclear, Oil or Gas w/ Steam Turbines; Gas Turbine

Fundamentals in Power Generation

Hydro Generation

Coal Fired Generation

Nuclear Power Plants

Oil and Gas Fired Generation

Additional Renewable Generation

Wind Turbines

Solar Cells

Biomass Generation

Storage

Future Technologies

Fundamentals in Power Generation – Evolution

4

Hydro Power Generation

Relies on a successful

“water cycle”

Most dams were built for

flood control and irrigation

Higher flow results in more

energy

“Run-of-River” or reservoir

storage with dam

Seasonal and annual variations

Hydro Power Generation

Hydro Power Generation – U.S.

Hydropower Generation – U.S.

Water Supply Forecasting is Critical

(2019 example)

Hydro Power Generation

Largest Hydro Plant in the World is Three Gorges in China

22,500MW

32 x 700Mw Turbine Generators

2 x 50Mw Generators

Built 1993 -2012

$32B (USD)

Yangtze River

Displaced 1.3M

people

Hydro Power Summary

Advantages:

Renewable resource

No carbon emissions

Domestic source

Flood control, irrigation,

water supply

Reliable, responsive

Dispatchable

Low operating cost, simple

Disadvantages:

Environmental impact

on the land use

Impact on natural habitats

Impact on fish migration

Organic materials in reservoirs

release methane

Coal Fired Generation The Rankine Cycle

The “Ideal” Rankine Cycle

Goal:

Improve the Thermodynamic

Efficiency of the Process

Net Power Output

Per Heat Input

Coal Fired Generation

Today’s Coal Fired Power Plant

Supercritical Boilers

Higher pressure and temperature, water @ supercritical state

Air Preheaters

Preheats ambient air used for combustion processes

Feedwater Heaters

Heat exchanger that preheats the feedwater using turbine extraction steam through to Preheat Feedwater

Economizers

Heat exchanger that preheats feedwater using flue gas

Operations and Maintenance

Coal Quality, Adjust for Load Following, Internal Cleaning, Fix Leaks!

Improving Plant Efficiency

Heat Rate and “Conversion Efficiency”

Amount of heat input required per unit of power generated

Energy input in BTU/hr

Electricity in kw

Heat Rate in BTU/kwhr

The lower the heat rate, the more efficient the plant

Coal Fired Generation - Efficiency

Heat Rate and “Thermal Efficiency”

Approximately 3412 Btu/hr is equal to 1 kw

We can calculate plant thermal efficiency:

E.g. Heat rate @ 10,300 Btu/kwhr

Thermal efficiency = 3412/10,300 ~ 33%

(industry average)

Improving Heat Rate = Savings

Heat content of coal ranges from 8000 Btu/lb to 12,000 Btu/lb

Coal costs about $30/ton, or $1.5MMBtu to $2/MMBtu

Typical coal plant is 500Mwe and burns 6000 tons/day

An example of 1% improvement in heat rate:

500Mw plant at 80% capacity factor that burns $2/MMBtu coal

500Mw x 10,200 btu/kwhr x8760hrs x.8 x1.0% x$2/MMBtu = $700,000/year +

Plant designers and operators are focused

on heat rate improvement

Improving Heat Rate = Savings

Savings achieved at

$2.50/MMBtu

Also, in the example, a 1% heat rate deduction corresponds to a

1% reduction in CO2 emissions - about 40,000 tons/ year

And a corresponding reduction in NOx and SO2 and mercury.

Average Heat Rates

2007 BTU/Kwhr 2017 BTU/Kwhr
Coal – Steam Turbine 10,158 10,043
Oil – Steam Turbine 10,398 10,199
Gas – Steam Turbine 10,440 10,353
Nuclear – Steam Turbine 10,489 10,459
Gas – Simple Cycle 11,632 11,176
Gas – Combined Cycle 7,577 7649

Source: EIA Form-860, August 2019

Coal Power Summary

Advantages:

Abundant fuel reserves

Low cost fuel

Known technology

Reliable, responsive

Dispatchable

Low capital & operating

costs

Repowering options

Disadvantages:

Carbon and other emissions

Impact from coal mining

Environmental impact

on the land use; mining and plant

Waste byproduct management

Cooling water impacts

Competitive challenge in markets

1950

1970

1990

2018

330

1,532

2,900

Billion KWH Generated

150

0

180

N/A

330

700

22

810

N/A

1,532

1,600

580

720

N/A

2,900

1,146

807

757

1,468

4,178

Coal

Nuclear

Other

Natural Gas

Billion KWH

4,178

Sources: http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table1_1.html, March 2011, EIA Electricity Data Browser net generation from electricity plants, updated 3/1/2019

55%

46%

45%

U.S. Generation has Grown 13-Fold Since 1950: Coal Percentage Significant until Lately …

East

Coal Nuclear Natural Gas Other 1146 807 1468 757

East Coal Other Nuclear 1600 720 580

East Coal Nuclear Other 700 22 810

East Coal Nuclear Other 150 0 180

Coal Generation over the Years

Coal Plant Retirements Continue

Coal Plant Retirements Continue

Coal and Natural Gas - “Head to Head”

25