RTI Case Study

profileaxedberf
EDUU512RTICaseStudyRubric.pdf

EDUU 512 RTI Case Study Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (5 pts.)

Proficient ( 4 pts.)

Emerging (3 pts.)

Needs Improvement (2 pts.)

Summary

Clearly and concisely summarizes the problem, how the problem was determined, interventions used and the effectiveness of the interventions

Adequately summarizes the problem, how the problem was determined, interventions used and the effectiveness of the interventions

Partially summarizes the problem, how the problem was determined, interventions used and the effectiveness of the interventions

Little or no summary provided that includes the problem, how the problem was determined, interventions used and the effectiveness of the interventions

Analysis & Reflection

Clearly and concisely describes insights gained about the RTI process, the role of data collection and analysis, the ways in which teachers collaborate, and the relationship between RTI and differentiated instruction.

Adequately describes insights gained about the RTI process, the role of data collection and analysis, the ways in which teachers collaborate, and the relationship between RTI and differentiated instruction.

Partially describes insights gained about the RTI process, the role of data collection and analysis, the ways in which teachers collaborate, and the relationship between RTI and differentiated instruction but analysis is minimal.

Little or no description of insights gained about the RTI process, the role of data collection and analysis, the ways in which teachers collaborate, and/or the relationship between RTI and differentiated instruction.

Writing Style/Mechanics

• Writing is clear and concise

• Varied sentence structure

• Academic writing conventions (grammar, spelling, punctuation etc.)

Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure is varied. Fully adheres to academic writing conventions (grammar, spelling punctuation etc.)

Writing is clear and sentence structure is somewhat varied. Adequately adheres to academic writing conventions (grammar, spelling, punctuation etc.) There are a few grammar, spelling and/or punctuation errors.

Writing is unclear and wordy. There is minimal variation in sentence structure. Partially adheres to academic writing conventions (grammar, spelling, punctuation etc.) There are several grammar, spelling and/or punctuation errors.

Writing is unclear. Sentence structure is the same throughout the paper. Writer does not adhere to academic writing conventions (grammar, spelling, punctuation etc.)