|
Content- 80%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Handout Information:
Educational Impact
|
16 to 17 points
Clearly conveys the educational thinker’s impact on education with at least 3 examples.
|
14 to 15 points
Adequately conveys the educational thinker’s impact on education with at least 2 examples.
|
1 to 13 points
Does not adequately convey the educational thinker’s impact on education and/or has fewer than 2 examples.
|
0 points
Does not adequately convey the educational thinker’s impact on education and/or has no examples.
|
|
Handout Information:
Educational Ideas
|
16 to 17 points
Clearly conveys the educational thinker’s ideas with at least 3 examples.
|
14 to 15 points
Adequately conveys the educational thinker’s ideas with at least 2 examples.
|
1 to 13 points
Does not adequately convey the educational thinker’s ideas and/or has fewer than 2 examples.
|
0 points
Does not adequately convey the educational thinker’s ideas and/or has no examples.
|
|
Video Presentation:
Professionalism/ Communication/ information
|
28 to 30 points
The video presentation clearly describes the educational thinker, the educational impact, and the educational ideas. The presentation is done in a professional manner; including professional dress (no jean, tennis shoes, or flip flops) and clarity of video (able to hear and see clearly)
|
25 to 27 points
The video presentation describes the educational thinker, the educational impact, and the educational ideas. The presentation is done in a professional manner; including professional dress (no jean, tennis shoes, or flip flops) and clarity of video (able to hear and see clearly)
|
1 to 24 points
The video presentation does not clearly describe the educational thinker, the educational impact, and/or the educational ideas. The presentation is done in a professional manner; including professional dress (no jean, tennis shoes, or flip flops) and clarity of video (able to hear and see clearly)
|
0 points
The video presentation does not clearly describe the educational thinker, the educational impact, and the educational ideas. The presentation is not done in a professional manner; including professional dress (no jean, tennis shoes, or flip flops) and clarity of video (able to hear and see clearly)
|
|
Video Presentation:
Critique
|
15 to 16 points
The video presentation provides a detailed critique of the educational thinker from both the presenter and an outside source.
|
13 to 14 points
The video presentation provides an adequate critique of the educational thinker from either the presenter or an outside source.
|
1 to 12 points
The video presentation does not provide an adequate critique of the educational thinker from either the presenter or an outside source.
|
0 points
A critique is not included in the video presentation.
|
|
Structure–20%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
|
Video Presentation:
5-minute requirement
|
5 points
The presentation is approximately 5 minutes in length.
|
4 points
The presentation is approximately 4 minutes in length.
|
1 to 3 points
The presentation is approximately 2-3 minutes in length.
|
0 points
The presentation is less than 2 minutes in length.
|
|
Handout
APA Format/ Mechanics
|
5 points
0–3 errors in current APA format/mechanics.
|
4 points
4–8 errors in current APA format/mechanics.
|
1 to 3 points
9–10 errors in current APA format/mechanics.
|
0 points
More than 10 errors in current APA format/mechanics.
|
|
Handout
Creativity
|
5 points
The handout is presented in a clear and creative fashion.
|
4 points
The handout is presented in a clear fashion but lacks creativity.
|
1 to 3 points
The handout is not presented in a clear and creative fashion.
|
0 points
Handout is not provided for the presentation.
|
|
References
|
5 points
Three or more references are listed from legitimate sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. All of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source.
|
4 points
Two or three references are listed from legitimate sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. At least 2 of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source.
|
1 to 3 points
One reference is listed and/or are from questionable sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. One or none of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source.
|
0 points
No references
|
Whitrorypory
EducationalThinkerPresentationGradingRubric.docx
0
