| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| TSL-532 | TSL-532-O500 | Educational Plan | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Strategies | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The strategies included may not be research based or may not have been shown to promote parental partnerships. | The submission includes research-based strategies that could promote parental partnerships, but the examples provided may not be associated with a particular school or could be developed further. | The submission includes research-based strategies to promote parental partnerships. The strategies are adequate for the specific school mentioned. | The submission includes research-based strategies that have been shown to promote parental partnerships. The strategies are appropriate for the specific school mentioned. Examples are provided. |
| Educational Resources | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The educational resources included may not clearly promote at-home practice or they may be vague or undeveloped. | The submission includes educational resources that could promote at-home practice, but the examples provided may not be associated with a particular school or could be developed further. | The submission includes adequate educational resources that could promote at-home practice within a particular school. The examples provided tie directly to the school mentioned. | The submission includes appropriate educational resources that would realistically promote at-home practice within a particular school. The examples provided tie directly to the school mentioned. |
| Technological Tools | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The submission includes examples of technological tools that may not be known within the professional community or the examples provided are not practical. | The submission includes examples of technological tools that may not be realistically utilized within a particular school or the examples provided need further development. | The submission includes adequate examples of technological tools that could be realistically utilized within a particular school. | The submission includes thoughtful examples of technological tools that could be realistically utilized within a particular school. |
| Student Outcomes | 20.0% | Not addressed. | The explanation regarding how the plan would improve student learning outcomes may be vague or insufficient or not enough examples are provided. | The submission includes an explanation regarding how the plan would improve student learning outcomes, but the explanation may need to be developed more fully or the examples provided may not tie directly to a particular school. | The submission includes an adequate explanation regarding how the plan would improve student learning outcomes. The examples provided tie directly to a particular school. | The submission includes a detailed and thorough explanation regarding how the plan would improve student learning outcomes. The specific examples provided tie directly to a particular school. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | The content is not organized. The ideas presented cannot be reconciled into a cohesive unit. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
EducationalPlanRubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
