journal entry
218 J U l Y / A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 V O l U M E 3 5 N U M B E R 4 219
best practices for Creating social presence and Caring behaviors online Kathleen Plante and Marilyn E. Asselin
doi: 10.5480/13-1094.1
The Institute of Medicine (2011) recom-
mends that nursing programs examine and
update their curricula so that faculty are
better equipped to adjust to changes in sci-
ence and technology, patient care needs, and
student preferences. In response to this call,
innovative and creative nursing programs
that incorporate technologic advances — in
both synchronous and asynchronous formats
— are emerging to address the unique learn-
ing styles of a diverse student population,
including the millennial learner. Courses
offering traditional, didactic, face-to-face
learning are being augmented or simulta-
neously offered with online pedagogies that
feature voice-over lectures and Internet dis-
cussions. Although some students and fac-
ulty find traditional classes appealing, online
or distance learning attracts students who
might not otherwise have the opportunity to
attend nursing classes due to work and family
demands (Mayne & Wu, 2011).
Students often state that their reason for
choosing nursing as a career is based on a
desire “to care” for people (Roach, 2008,
p. 16). Caring has been a dominant theme
in shaping nursing programs and a compo-
nent of nursing student skills assessment.
According to Watson (1988), caring is “the
moral ideal of nursing,” defined as a “value
and an attitude that has to become a will, an
intention, or a commitment, that manifests
itself in concrete acts” (p. 32). Caring is the
“heart of nursing,” an ontology that is the
ethical and philosophical foundation of the
art of nursing, and it involves a deep com-
mitment to the patients, families, and com-
munities that nurses encounter. Students
learn caring behaviors through faculty mod-
eling and values in the traditional classroom
setting (Watson); however, these behav-
iors are difficult to portray in the online
environment (Gallagher-Lepak, Reilly, &
Killion, 2009).
If caring is viewed as the essence of
nursing, can caring and social presence
be demonstrated in a virtual environment
where visual and verbal cues and behaviors
are absent? One challenge that faces fac-
ulty who teach online classes is to create a
sense of social presence where students feel
connected and part of the learning environ-
ment. Mayne and Wu (2011) define social
presence as the “degree to which partici-
pants in computer-mediated communication
feel affectively connected to one another”
(p. 111). Students often describe feeling iso-
lated and disconnected when participating
in online learning. Fostering social presence
is a challenge for faculty because the feel-
ing of presence is an emotion that conveys
a connection of being wanted by others and
being cared for. In the context of an online
community, social presence has common
characteristics with models of caring (Shen,
Yu, & Khalifa, 2010).
AIm to identify best practices and evidence-based strategies for creating an online learning environment that encompasses caring behaviors and promotes social presence.
bACkGround Faculty who teach online classes are challenged to create a sense of social presence and caring behaviors in a virtual world in which students feel connected and part of the learning environment.
method To extrapolate evidence to support best practices, a review of literature was conducted focused on social presence and caring online.
resuLts faculty messages that are respectful, positive, encouraging, timely, and frequent foster social presence and caring behaviors while also allowing for caring interactions, mutual respect, and finding meaning in relationships.
ConCLusIon A variety of measures to emulate caring online intertwine with social presence to promote a sense of caring and belonging. More research is needed to support the evidence for these strategies.
Abstract
nursing education Perspectives
220 J U l Y / A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 V O l U M E 3 5 N U M B E R 4 221
Nursing Education Perspectives
An additional challenge in the online
environment involves identifying ways to
display the caring behaviors typically dis-
played in the traditional classroom setting,
(Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009) through
behaviors, interactions, and role-modeling by
faculty. In an online class, these behaviors are
difficult to portray.
Numerous examples of nursing courses
exist that address best practices on how to
promote social presence to a diverse student
body; however, there is a dearth of literature
that addresses how caring and social pres-
ence can be conveyed in an online classroom.
This article identifies best practices and evi-
dence-based strategies for creating an online
learning environment that encompasses car-
ing behaviors and promotes social presence.
method
A Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied
Health Literature search was conducted
using a combination of key words, including
social presence, caring, online, and distance
learning, for articles published between
2006 and 2011. Articles that included the key
words in the title or abstract and research that
concerned all levels of online degree-focused
programs were considered for this review;
conference abstracts and other “gray litera-
ture” were excluded. The articles were read
to determine their relevance in answering the
question: What are the best practices and evi-
dence-based strategies to create social pres-
ence and caring in an online environment?
Commonalities were extracted and themes
were identified to develop best practices.
The combination of the key words “social
presence” and “online” yielded 22 results,
but only four articles specifically addressed
students and faculty in the online setting
and focused on nursing (Cobb, 2011; Jones,
Wilson, Carter, & Jester, 2009; Lahaie, 2007;
Mayne & Wu, 2011). Two articles were found
for other disciplines: clinical laboratory sci-
ence (Esani, 2010) and computer technology
and education (Rockinson-Szapkiw, Baker,
Neukrug, & Hanes, 2010). A search using
the key words “caring” and “online” gener-
ated 120 articles, but only four studies met
the inclusion criteria (Gabbert, 2008; Leners
& Sitzman, 2006; Sitzman, 2010; Sitzman &
Leners, 2006). “Caring” and “distance learn- ing” yielded six potential articles for review;
of these, only one article, which focused on
an international distance-learning course
for clinical research study coordinators and
clinical research managers, met the criteria
(Jones et al., 2009). In summary, 11 articles
were used for this review.
resuLts
Social Presence Creating a sense of social presence in
which students feel connected and part of
the learning environment is a challenge
faced by faculty when teaching online
classes. Communication is guided by basic
Netiquette, defined as the rules of online
conduct, and text-based language that
lacks voice and tone inflections (Lahaie,
2007). Students interact with names but
no faces and miss the visual cues that help
them derive meaning from discourse: facial
expressions, body language, and eye contact
(Esani, 2010; Mayne & Wu, 2011). In addi-
tion, students often must wait a significant
time for their email questions to be answered
(Esani; Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009).
Online students have reported feeling
isolated (Lahaie, 2007; Mayne & Wu, 2011;
Rockinson-Szapkiw et al., 2010; Sitzman
& Leners, 2006), not feeling “real” (Cobb,
2011), fearing they may have posted some-
thing incorrect (Gallagher-Lepak et al.,
2009), and lacking a personal connection to
faculty and fellow students (Lahaie; Sitzman
& Leners). Social presence has been studied
in the business and management literature
(Shen et al., 2010) and in disciplines such as
computer technology (Rockinson-Szapkiw et
al.). Until recently, the nursing literature has
focused on strategies to create social pres-
ence (Lahaie) and perceived learning (Cobb)
in graduate nursing students (Mayne & Wu)
and for those transitioning to online teaching
(Esani, 2010).
The process of socialization and feeling
connected to the group is a positive contrib-
utor to acquiring a sense of social presence.
Commitment to the group, supporting oth-
ers, and developing a sense of belonging fos-
ter a sense of community that is reciprocal in
nature (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009). Best
practicies for creating a sense of community
include having students and faculty post pho-
tographs of themselves, writing biographies,
encouraging interactions through teamwork,
and posting communications and oppor-
tunities to share challenges (Esani, 2010;
Gallagher-Lepak et al.; Mayne & Wu, 2011).
Jones et al. (2009) fostered social presence in
an international online course via videotaped
introductions by the faculty in addition to stu-
dent presentations to introduce themselves.
Social presence was further heightened by
the use of emails and video calls (e.g., Skype
and FaceTime), online chats, and discussion board postings. Jones et al. found that despite
differences in language, time-zone changes,
and cultural barriers, students valued these
experiences and interactions with faculty and
fellow students.
Results from the literature suggest that
faculty who use greetings and praise, initi-
ate discussions, and encourage students to
express their points of view develop a sense of
community and trust in their students (Cobb,
2011; Lahaie, 2007). Personal connectedness
is enhanced by sharing stories and invitations
to encourage discussion by, for example, join-
ing a “virtual café.”
Gallagher-Lepak et al. (2009) found that
emotional connectedness was a crucial fac-
tor in setting the tone for feeling a sense of
community, decreasing isolation, and build-
ing confidence. Gunawardena and Zittle
(1997) developed the Social Presence Scale to
study the effectiveness of social presence in
predicting satisfaction in the online environ-
ment. Results of two studies using the scale
revealed that faculty techniques can have a
significant effect on the perception of social
presence by students and lead to feelings of
connectedness, trust, belonging, and comfort
(Cobb, 2011; Mayne & Wu, 2011).
Discovering the best practices and evi-
dence to create social presence in the virtual
environment can be challenged by a lack of
research on the concept. However, drawing on
220 J U l Y / A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 V O l U M E 3 5 N U M B E R 4 221
social Presence and caring
the state of the science to date, social presence
can be fostered by multiple, creative strategies.
For example, online communications that use
text-based techniques such as abbreviations
(e.g., LOL, meaning “laughing out loud”),
emoticons (e.g., smiley faces), and punctuation
(e.g., exclamation points) can substitute for
tone of voice and other social cues. Purnell
(2006), on the other hand, found these forms
of communication distracting, inappropriate
for use in reflection, and disruptive to the pro-
cess of deep thinking by students.
Simple, human phrases that convey car-
ing and foster social presence are welcom-
ing (e.g., hello, take care) and help connect
students with one another (Lahaie, 2007).
Rockinson-Szapkiw et al. (2010) found that
combining synchronous and asynchronous
communications fostered a significantly
higher degree of social presence compared
with the exclusive use of asynchronous com-
munication. Opportunites for video calls
allowed students to express themselves and
alleviated feelings of isolation. Jones et al.
(2009) described how international students
overcame language barriers through the use
of video chats. Faculty commented on the
eager and respectful communication by stu-
dents, and students remained in contact with
faculty long after the course ended.
Shen et al. (2010) noted that “being
with another” is associated with caring as
well as social presence. The expression of
caring behaviors is reciprocal. Being aware
of the “other,” fulfilling another’s needs,
and the feeling of intimacy with others
through self-disclosure lead to the reciprocal
exchange of information that translates to
social presence.
Caring Teaching a caring pedagogy has roots in fem-
inism, phenomenology, and moral and ethical
principles that are core principles of nursing
(Emerson, 2007; Billings & Halstead, 2009). When nursing students witness their leaders
embracing caring behaviors and supporting
them in their nursing practice, they, in turn,
feel cared for (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009),
but the human connection vital to nursing is
disembodied in the online environment.
Few studies focus on caring in online
learning. A qualitative study by Gallagher-
Lepak et al. (2009) described the concept of
community (connectedness and trust among
group members) as a basis for implement-
ing caring behaviors and fostering a sense
of community in a virtual environment. The
study found that written communications can
convey attitudes of politeness, trust, concern
for others, and respect. A similar study by
Sitzman and Leners (2006) articulated the
perceptions of baccalaureate nursing stu-
dents about what constitutes a caring online
environment and how caring is differently
communicated in an online classroom. Some
best practices to convey caring in the online
classroom follow.
Faculty who display caring behaviors
via online responses use expressions of
concern, politeness, respectful communica-
tion, and convey trust in their written word
(Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009). Leners and
Sitzman (2006) found perceptions of caring
similar for master’s and doctoral nursing stu-
dents during an online class. Students noted
that timeliness (prompt responses), empathy
(demonstrating concern, seeing the other’s
perspective), tones of appreciation (affirma-
tion and encouragement), “being the best I
can be” (encouraging), and “finding a cord
of harmony” (being viewed as an individual)
were positive behaviors demonstrated by
faculty.
Sitzman (2010) used a mixed-method
research design to determine online generic
and RN to BSN nursing students’ percep-
tions of important behaviors demonstrated
by faculty to convey feelings of caring.
Themes identified included empathetic pres-
ence, clarity/expertise, timeliness, and fully
engaged/accessible. The most important fac-
ulty behavior identified by students was writ-
ing clear instructions that helped students be
successful.
In an environment that is mutually
respectful, where faculty take advantage of all
opportunities to demonstrate caring behav-
iors, nursing students become aware of them-
selves as caring individuals and learn how
their own spiritual and psychological beliefs
can be incorporated into caring toward others
(Emerson, 2007). Purnell (2006) developed a
model of nursing education grounded in car-
ing, based on the “nursing as caring” theory
of Boykin and Schoenhoffer (1993, 2001) for
online nursing education. With this model,
caring language is embedded in all texts,
modules, and student-faculty exchanges. It is
centered on respect and valuing the other’s
contributions in a safe learning environment.
Caring in the online environment is con-
veyed by written expression, and each unique
learning experience is enhanced through
dialogue, a variety of ways of knowing, and
professional examples and reflection. Leners
and Sitzman’s study of preceptions of caring
by graduate nursing students (2006) states
that efforts to create caring in an online
setting lead to higher retention rates and a
boost in student self-esteem and perceived
competence. Their exploration of how fac-
ulty convey caring uncovered eight themes,
with prompt feedback by faculty the first
response. The other themes overlap with
fostering social presence in an online class-
room and include timeliness and consistency,
the reciprocal process of support, trust, and
respect, developing a personal connection
and empathy, making expectations known,
making faculty available, and the impor-
tance of feedback. Knowing that they were
not alone was an important aspect of feeling
cared for by faculty.
Cobb (2011) found that it was important
for faculty to use introductions to encourage
discussion, to facilitate discussion, and to
encourage students to express their points
of view. Mayne and Wu (2011) pointed to the
importance of setting boundaries for confi-
dentiality and professionalism online and
creating a safe environment built on trust
while encouraging students to post biogra-
phies and pictures and ask questions. Billings
and Halstead (2009) write of the need for
faculty to be flexible and manage diversity,
ambiguity, and conflict.
dIsCussIon
No research was found on the combined
concepts of social presence and caring in
222 J U l Y / A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 V O l U M E 3 5 N U M B E R 4 223
Nursing Education Perspectives
the online setting, but similar and overlap-
ping themes for each construct were found
in the literature. Practices to promote car-
ing and social presence were found in both
qualitative and quantitative studies, and best
practices were identified from data analy-
sis, feedback from participants, satisfaction
scores, narratives that reinforced feelings of
being cared for or a sense of belonging, and
behaviors that promoted social presence and
caring. (See Table.)
Faculty who teach online classes are chal-
lenged to create caring social engagement
through interactions that promote a sense of
belonging and a sense of community. This
perspective actualizes the human potential
of interpersonal relationships, the trust of
self and others, and awareness of others’ feel-
ings. Sitzman and Leners (2006) report that
students in a traditional classroom recount
caring traits and behaviors of their teachers
as “honesty, respect, understanding, kind-
ness, compassion” and “positive reinforce-
ment” (p. 255), as well as praise, sensitivity
to needs, and positive role-modeling. Similar
themes are present in Sitzman’s (2010) qual-
itative study, which describes how faculty
manifest caring by sending messages that are
respectful, positive, encouraging, timely, and
frequent. Students see caring as reciprocal.
Caring messages begin with trust and respect
and the use of polite and encouraging lan-
guage. Prompt feedback promotes trust and
confidence (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009).
Mutual attributes of caring and social
presence are: honesty; being responsive,
respectful, and open; freedom from retribu-
tion; and the ability to freely express thoughts
and ideas (Billings & Halstead, 2009). Caring
behaviors and social presence as perceived
in the traditional classroom setting can be
successfully incorporated into the online
environment by intentional caring of the fac-
ulty. Faculty who make a conscious effort to
support others, build confidence, trust, and a
sense of belonging, and demonstrate respect
in online discussions will have positive out-
comes and increased retention (Sitzman &
Leners, 2006).
Billings and Halstead (2009) stress the
need to use multiple strategies to create
social presence and demonstrate caring in
an online classroom. They emphasize the
need for active participation by students and
student-teacher interactions with the shar-
ing of stories, personal reflection, problem
solving, and understanding the significance
of these experiences. Faculty messages that
are respectful, positive, encouraging, timely,
and frequent add to feelings of social pres-
ence and the reciprocal feelings of caring
among students. Timely feedback, respond-
ing to students’ questions, and displays of
empathy or support by faculty help students
feel connected to the class, promote student
interactions, and integrate caring and social
presence into student course work. Emerson
(2007) states that caring, as a partnership
between the student and faculty, is a com-
mitment and foundation for good teaching
practices.
future reseArCh
It is important to continue to seek ways to
advance social presence and caring in the
online environment through research. For
example, what specific communication styles
do faculty use to enhance social presence and
caring? To what extent do caring behaviors
learned in the online environment transfer
to the patient care setting? And, importantly,
if caring is viewed as the essence of nursing
and uniquely expressed in nursing, then to
what extent can caring be expressed in an
Table: Best Practices to Create Social Presence and Caring in an Online Environment
Caring language in all text, modules, and student-faculty exchanges, for example, respecting and valuing each other’s contributions (Purnell, 2006)
Discussion board postings (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2009)
Encouraging interactions through teamwork (Esani, 2010; Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009; mayne & Wu, 2011)
Encourage responses/ask questions (Cobb, 2011; Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009; Lahaie, 2007; Mayne & Wu, 2011)
Encourage students to express their point of view (Cobb, 2011; Lahaie, 2007)
Frequent contact (Leners & Sitzman, 2006; Sitzman, 2010; Sitzman & Leners, 2006)
Initiate discussion (Cobb, 2011; Lahaie, 2007)
introductions to enhance and open discussion (cobb, 2011)
Messages that are respectful, positive, and encouraging (Leners & Sitzman, 2006; Sitzman, 2010)
Open dialogue/opportunities to express oneself/share challenges (Mayne & Wu, 2011; Rockinson-Szapkiw et al., 2010)
Posting communications (Esani, 2010; Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009; Mayne & Wu, 2011)
Prompt feedback (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009)
Providing opportunities to share challenges (Esani, 2010; Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009)
safe environment (mayne & Wu, 2011)
Supporting others (Gallagher-Lepak et al., 2009)
Timeliness (prompt responses) (Leners & Sitzman, 2006; Sitzman, 2010; Sitzman & Leners, 2006)
Tones of appreciation (affirmation and encouragement) (Leners & Sitzman, 2006)
Using human phrases for greetings and praise (hello, take care) (Cobb, 2011; Lahaie, 2007)
222 J U l Y / A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 V O l U M E 3 5 N U M B E R 4 223
social Presence and caring
environment where presence and sense of
self are perceived through the written word?
And what are the consequences of uncaring
behaviors in the online setting? How can fac-
ulty discern and identify nonverbal, unspo-
ken cues by students that may lead to feelings
of not belonging or not caring?
The patient-nurse perception of caring
is an important consideration culturally.
Research is needed to help students under-
stand cultural means of caring to improve
interactations within the online community
and with patients. Caring requires judgment,
moral values, and ethical insight, underpin-
ning diverse approaches of the knowledge
required to implement caring in diverse pop-
ulations (Watson & Smith, 2002).
Cobb (2011) found a strong correlation
between social presence, satisfaction, and
instructor performance. Valid and reliable
instruments are needed to evaluate these
concepts to advance the state of the science.
Further exploration of the Social Presence
Scale (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) is needed
with regard to online communication, instruc-
tor performance, and satisfaction with the
course (Cobb, 2011). Evaluation of caring and
social presence should be built into the cur-
riculum program evaluation. Social presence
has been highly correlated with student sat-
isfaction and learning (Cobb). More clarity is
needed to understand how positive outcomes
can be further achieved in the online setting
through the intentional engagement of faculty.
About the Authors
Kathleen Plante, MSN, RN, an assistant pro-
fessor at Bristol Community College School
of Nursing, Fall River, Massachusetts, is a
doctoral student in nursing at the University
of Massachusetts, North Dartmouth.
Marilyn E. Asselin, PhD, RN, BC, is an assis-
tant professor, University of Massachusetts-
Dartmouth, Department of Adult/Child
Nursing. For more information, contact Ms.
Plante at [email protected].
key Words
Nursing Education – Social Presence –
Caring – Online and Distance Learning
referenCes
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2009). Teaching and learning in online learning communities. In D. M. Billings & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (3rd ed., pp. 369-387). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Boykin, A., & Schoenhoffer, S. O. (1993). Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Boykin, A., & Schoenhoffer, S. O. (2001). Nursing as caring: A model for practice. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Cobb, S. C. (2011). Social presence, satisfaction, and perceived learning of RN-to-BSN students in web-based nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 115-119. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.115
Emerson, R. J. (2007). Theoretical foundations of the clinical nursing practicum. In K. Green (Ed.), Nursing education in the clinical setting (pp. 16-38). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
Esani, M. (2010). Moving from face-to-face to online teaching. Clinical Laboratory Science, 23(3), 187-190.
Gabbert, W. L. (2008). Beyond on-line: Enhancing caring and professional practice in nursing education. International Journal for Human Caring, 12(2), 68-80.
Gallagher-Lepak, S., Reilly, J., & Killion, C. M. (2009). Nursing student perceptions of community in online learning. Contemporary Nurse, 32(1-2), 133-146.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction with a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 8-26.
Institute of Medicine (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jones, C. T., Wilson, L. L., Carter, S. & Jester, P. M. (2009). Development and implementation of a distance-learning certificate program in clinical research management at international sites. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 9(3), 8.
Lahaie, U. (2007). Strategies for creating social presence online. Nurse Educator, 32(3), 100-101.
Leners, D. W., & Sitzman, K. (2006). Graduate student perceptions: Feeling the passion of caring online. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(6), 315-319. doi:10.1043/1536-5026(2006)027[0315:GSPFTP]2.0. CO;2
Mayne, L. A., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and measuring social presence in online graduate nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110-114. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.110
Purnell, M. J. (2006). Development of a model of nursing education grounded in caring and application to online nursing education. International Journal for Human Caring, 10(3), 8-16.
Roach, M. S. (2008). Caring scholar response to: Caring as the central domain in nursing education. International Journal for Human Caring, 12(2), 16-18.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Baker, J. D., Neukrug, E., & Hanes, J. (2010). The efficacy of computer mediated communication technologies to augment and support effective online helping profession education. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28, 161-177.
Shen, K. N., Yu, A. Y., & Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 337-348.
Sitzman, K. (2010). Student-preferred caring behaviors for online nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(3), 171-178. doi:10.1043/1536-5026-31.3.171
Sitzman, K., & Leners, D. W. (2006). Student perceptions of caring in online baccalaureate education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(5), 254-259. doi:10.1043/1536-5026(2006)27[254:SPOCIO]2.0.CO;2
Watson, J. (1988). Nursing: Human science and human care (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Watson, J., & Smith, M. (2002). Caring science and the science of unitary human beings: A trans-theoretical discourse for nursing knowledge development. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(5), 452-461.
Copyright of Nursing Education Perspectives is the property of National League for Nursing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.