PLEASE READ CAREFULLY Two Separate Assignments in One
socialwrk2018
Eco-MapTemplate.docxName: ______________________________________ Date: _________________________
Eco-Map
Case:
Goals:
1.
2.
3.
KEY
= Strong/Positive Relationships
= Very Strong Relationship
= Weak/Negative Relationship
= Stressful/Adverse Relationship
= Strained Relationship
= Male
= Female
From the Perspective of:
_____________________________________
Print & Signature
_____________________________________
Helper Name & Title
_____________________________________
Helper Signature
Name: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________
ECO – MAP
Purpose: To have a visual depiction of one’s life/relationships to help identify strengths and stressors which can affirm for them their feelings of depression, anxiety, or even pride at the strengths they have developed.
Case Description:
The components to include:
· A brief description of who the client is
· What services are needed
· Previous services received
· Referral type
· Describe initial contact
Case History:
The components to include:
· Identify the client
· Demographic information about the client (e.g., age, gender, marital status, # of children, employment status)
· Presenting problem
· Identified strengths
· Support system
· Important relationships
Key/Legend:
Include all of the symbols used in the Eco-Map. It may need to be on a separate sheet.
HUS 335: Interpersonal Helping Skills
Rubric for Eco Maps (15%)
Name: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
|
PRESENTATION |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Poor |
Not Included |
TOTAL POINTS |
|
Identified Client |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rapport Building Interview |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Theory Identified a theory that may fit the study; identified the founder of the theory; when the theory was developed |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Ethical Issues Identified potential ethical issues; deception, confidentiality; informed consent |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Literature Review At least 5 researched articles (peer-reviewed) used; discussion of previous studies and their relation to the topic; identified components relevant to the research proposal |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Methodology Identified the sample, procedures, and instrument(s) |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Reference Cited references in text and have a reference list in APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional & engaging presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dressed professionally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good voice/tone quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used proper grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Made eye contact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowledgeable of the topic Includes not reading directly from PowerPoint or notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall quality of presentation Worthwhile attending – organized, interesting, great effort made (exceeded expectations w/charts & graphs), showed passion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: FINAL GRADE: _________
30 points
