Business & Finance - Marketing Business Finance - Management ASSIGNMENT (APA, NO PLAGARISM, GREAT WORK, ON TIME)
R E S E A R CH A R T I C L E
Artificial intelligence for international business: Its use, challenges, and suggestions for future research and practice
Jane Menzies1 | Bianka Sabert1 | Rohail Hassan2,3 | Prince Kofi Mensah4
1School of Business and Creative Industries,
University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy
Downs, Queensland, Australia
2Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of
Business (OYAGSB), Universiti Utara Malaysia,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3University of Economics and Human Sciences
in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
4University of Ghana Business School,
University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Correspondence
Jane Menzies, School of Business and Creative
Industries, University of the Sunshine Coast,
Sippy Downs 4556, QLD, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed global business, aiding
operational efficiency and innovation. It utilizes machine learning and big data analyt-
ics, driving predictive market trends and strategic decision-making. However, despite
the rising discussion and accessibility of AI tools, understanding its impact on interna-
tional business remains limited. This article explores AI's potential in international
business strategies, practices, and activities. To address this aim, we reviewed 37 arti-
cles in the existing literature to critically explore AI within the context of international
business. More specifically, we explored how AI can be applied to innovation
approaches in international business, international market selection, entry modes,
foreign exchange, international human resource management, international supply
chains, managing across cultures, and more topics. AI has necessitated changes in
workplace configurations and the need for organizational and employee adjustments
in response to this technology. As a result of the foregoing issues on AI integration
within international business, our analysis provided an exploratory discussion around
its use, challenges, managerial implications, and suggested areas requiring future
studies.
K E YWORD S
artificial intelligence, challenges, international business, practices, strategies
1 | INTRODUCTION
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force reshaping the
international business (IB) landscape. In an era of digital revolution, AI
technologies have become essential tools for enhancing operational
efficiency, decision-making, and innovation globally. AI encompasses
diverse technologies, including machine learning, robotics, natural lan-
guage processing, and artificial neural networks (Ciulli & Kolk, 2023;
Soori et al., 2023a). AI can be instrumental in addressing the complex
challenges associated with global operations. For instance, machine
learning has been utilized to improve the understanding of cultural
heterogeneity within a country (Messner, 2022). Natural language
processing enables systems to comprehend complex human language,
understand nuanced contexts, and interpret varied meanings
(Jarrahi, 2018). Based on the content the natural language processing
system is trained on, it can engage in tasks such as copywriting for
national and international professions (Jung et al., 2017), which has
even led to screenwriter strikes in Hollywood, who feared to be
replaced by AI (Alvarez-Mitchell, 2023).
AI has been considered as a computer system that conducts its
operations like human beings, thus mimicking human intellect
(Fleck, 2021; Prentice et al., 2020). The seminal work of McCarthy
et al. (1955) defines AI as “the science and engineering of making
intelligent machines.” The realm of AI encompasses diverse
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22370
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2024 The Authors. Thunderbird International Business Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2024;66:185–200. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie 185
capabilities—perception, reasoning, learning, and decision-making—at
individual or institutional levels (Manning, 2020; Xie & He, 2022). A
contemporary definition by the OECD (2022, p. 4) characterizes AI as
“a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined
objectives, make predictions, recommendations, or decisions influenc-
ing real or virtual environments. AI systems are designed to operate
with varying levels of autonomy.” Meltzer (2018) explains that AI is
self-learning systems that can learn from experience with humanlike
aspects and can sometimes surpass human performance on tasks.
According to Tambe et al. (2019), AI is a broad category of technolo-
gies that enables a machine to carry out tasks that normally need
human cognition. AI exhibits several skills, including the ability to com-
prehend natural language, spot patterns in data, solve problems, and
adjust to novel circumstances without the need for explicit program-
ming. There is a range of practical AI applications, including smart
assistants such as Alexa or Google Home, translation, transcription,
self-driving cars, medical diagnosis, robotics and more (OECD, 2022).
Using AI in business is critical for improving productivity, compet-
itiveness, and decision-making, especially in the context of multina-
tional enterprises (MNEs) (Bag et al., 2021; Wamba-Taguimdje
et al., 2020). AI integration significantly empowers businesses in navi-
gating intricate global environments by facilitating advanced predic-
tive analytics, task automation, and leveraging data-driven insights
(Allal-Chérif et al., 2021; Bag et al., 2021; Satheesh et al., 2020;
Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020). Adoption of AI in company opera-
tions can result in significant economic gains. It is predicted that there
will be an additional $13 trillion in global economic activity by 2030
as a result of AI use, according to a McKinsey report (Bughin
et al., 2018). It is, therefore, imperative that IBs have an AI strategy.
Through a combination of AI and data analytics, IBs are in a better
position to predict market demands and mitigate risks, optimize sup-
ply chain management, streamline logistics, and enhance cross-border
transactions (Li et al., 2021; Shi, 2022; Zhu, 2021). AI-powered lan-
guage translation, utilizing natural language processing, has the poten-
tial to significantly enhance cross-cultural and cross-linguistic
communication and negotiation by offering real-time, simultaneous
translation, bridging language barriers, thereby fostering stronger and
more effective international partnerships (Elhadi, 2023). AI-driven
machine translation (MT) has been highlighted for its potential to
lower language barriers in trade, notably aiding e-retailers in strength-
ening exports (OECD, 2022). AI is also poised to help reduce transac-
tion costs generally (Chen & Kamal, 2016).
Undoubtedly, over 2023, the proliferation of discussion about AI
has increased with the introduction and open accessibility of Open
AI's Chat-GPT and other similar programs such as Microsoft's Bing
and Google's Bard. This accessibility has propelled AI into the main-
stream, fostering widespread curiosity about its impact on work and
business landscapes. With documented potential to transform cross-
border trade and collaboration, AI's influence extends to governmen-
tal levels in international trade negotiations (Li et al., 2021;
OECD, 2022; Zhu, 2021). Despite this, a substantial knowledge gap
exists regarding AI's application across various facets of IB strategies,
practices, and activities. There is a rising discussion in academic
research that investigates various sorts of AI digital tools and tech-
niques, as well as whether businesses can benefit from such solutions
(Castellacci & Viñas-Bardolet, 2019). In this regard, the recent calls for
academic scholarship on AI in IB have received considerable attention
in premier IB journals, including other related disciplines such as inter-
national management, general management and human resource
management (Malik, Budhwar & Kazmi, 2023).
For this reason, research conducted at the intersection of AI and
IB takes on an increasingly multidisciplinary nature (Jarrahi, 2018).
According to Jones (2023), there is still a lack of understanding in the
literature on AI and IB regarding how AI and related technologies can
provide solutions for effective IB and subfunctional areas, as well as
how AI-enabled IB functions link to other operational tasks to deliver
improved outcomes for their organizations. This article explores AI's
potential roles within IB frameworks to address this gap.
Given the importance of this technology to IB in general, we
explore the relevance and application of AI for IB in this article. By
doing this, we contribute to the research literature in several impor-
tant ways. First, there are no other articles that have systematically
reviewed the current literature on AI and IB. Second, there are no
papers that have examined how AI can be used in the various strate-
gies, activities, and practices of IBs. We also explore the various chal-
lenges for the implementation of AI, which can help IBs appreciate the
issues involved in AI implementation. Furthermore, we offer sugges-
tions for future researchers to examine the issues around the imple-
mentation of AI in IBs and the practical implications of doing so. As a
result, this serves as a guide for MNEs, IBs, researchers, academic
educators, and students on how IB can benefit from AI
implementation.
The structure of our article is organized for clarity and depth of
understanding. Section 2 outlines the Methodology, detailing the sys-
tematic approach adopted for our review. Following this, Section 3
presents the results, focusing on the diverse applications of AI in IB
strategies, practices, and activities. The discussion in Section 4 shifts
to exploring the challenges faced by IBs in implementing AI, offering
critical insights. This section also recommends that future research
broaden its scope by incorporating various theories and perspectives
on AI and IB issues. Additionally, we provide a series of managerial
implications, guiding managers on effectively integrating AI into their
IB operations.
2 | METHODOLOGY
In this article, we conducted a traditional/narrative literature review
of prior literature (Grant & Booth, 2009) to examine how AI can be
integrated into the various strategies, practices, and activities of the
IB. Our methodology adhered to the standards outlined by Grant and
Booth (2009), which involves gathering research, methodically exclud-
ing works of inferior quality, and synthesizing the findings published
in the field. This approach, as emphasized by Grant and Booth (2009),
allowed us to cover a broad spectrum of topics with varying degrees
of depth and breadth, adopting a thematic lens for our analysis.
186 MENZIES ET AL.
Moreover, the essence of a literature review is the synthesis of
prior studies into coherent forms—be it textual, tabular, or graphical—
and the subsequent analysis of their findings and contributions (Paul
et al., 2021). It is essential in academic research for uncovering and
building upon existing findings by identifying gaps in the literature,
thus guiding future research directions and aiding researchers in rec-
ognizing unexplored areas requiring further investigation (Paul
et al., 2021). A literature review, therefore, allows for knowledge
advancement (Palmatier et al., 2017; Paul & Menzies, 2023) as new
directions for research can be posed.
We started with a systematic approach by searching the Web of
Science (WOS) on “AI” and “IB.” This resulted in 21 articles. We then
took on the strategy of searching for articles in each IB domain area.
For example, we searched WOS for “AI” and “foreign exchange” (24 articles), “international human resource management” (4), “foreign market analysis” (0), “entry mode” (5), “international trade negotia-
tions” (2), “IB process” (0), “international marketing” (5), and “global supply chains” (21), which resulted in a total of 82 articles. There were
no duplicates and our initial screening of the articles based on the
abstracts resulted in the exclusion of 33 articles, leaving us with
49 articles. We excluded articles if they were conference papers, were
not on an IB topic, or were irrelevant to the study. We then down-
loaded the full text of all articles and excluded 12 more for lack of rel-
evance, leaving us with 37 articles. We did a thematic analysis of
these 37 articles to develop our literature review and answer our
research questions. The following PRISMA diagram provides details of
our search strategy (Figure 1).
3 | THE USE OF AI IN IB
In this section, we explore the diverse applications of AI across
the various aspects of IB, and we answer the question, “How
do IBs pursue opportunities around AI for their various strate-
gies, activities, and practices?” To help guide our discussion in
the next section, we provide Figure 2, which highlights how AI
can be used in the various strategies, activities, and practices
of IBs.
3.1 | Innovation approaches in international business
As the OECD (2022) argues, AI has the potential to spur innova-
tion; it can help organizations create value from data and reduce
trade costs through more efficient operations and supply chains.
AI can augment human creativity by opening up new avenues for
developing innovative products, services, processes, and business
model (Haan & Watts, 2023). From an innovation perspective, AI
presents significant opportunities for MNEs to enhance both qual-
ity and performance in their operations, including finding and fix-
ing bugs, enhancing features, and increasing reliability
(Nuttal, 2022). AI has the potential to improve innovation, opera-
tional agility, and strategic decision-making, giving a company a
competitive edge in the fast-paced, globally integrated market
(OECD, 2022).
F IGURE 1 PRISMA diagram for the search strategy for artificial intelligence (AI) and international business (IB). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
MENZIES ET AL. 187
F IGURE 2 How artificial intelligence (AI) can be used in the various strategies, activities, and practices of international businesses (IBs).
188 MENZIES ET AL.
3.2 | International market selection
Decisions on strategy and technology complexities have largely influ-
enced the nature of cross-border market entry (Benito et al., 2022).
With the ease of information sharing across borders and globally,
technology drives much more global business engagements, even at a
lower cost (Benito et al., 2022; Stallkamp & Schotter, 2021). Benito
et al. (2022) suggest that there is a need for IBs to examine within-
country and cross-country network externalities. Technological
advancements such as AI can play a role in international market selec-
tion (IMS). IMS is defined as “the process of establishing criteria for
selecting (country) markets, investigating market potentials, classifying
them according to the agreed criteria and selecting which markets
should be addressed first and those suitable for later development
(Andersen & Strandskov, 1998, p. 67).” AI can allow MNEs greater
access to international markets and increase international opportunity
recognition (Dillon et al., 2020). AI enables MNEs to efficiently moni-
tor emerging trends and opportunities in overseas markets without
making substantial resource commitments to local marketing affiliates
(Luo & Zahra, 2023). Through AI-enabled data analytics and visualiza-
tion tools, MNEs can benefit from analyzing market trends and oppor-
tunities by gaining insights and recommendations on a foreign
market's current and future state (Meltzer, 2018).
Furthermore, AI could assist with creating a business plan for for-
eign market entry, as it may assist with comparing cultural and psychic
distances between countries. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT,
Bing, and Bard excel in swiftly producing comprehensive business
plans (Hughes, 2023). It could also provide insights into the political,
economic, legal, and regulatory environments, market, industry, and
competitor information essential when analyzing foreign countries for
market entry. AI could also allow for creating country, industry, and
competitor profiles through Chat-GPT, Bing Chat, or Google Bard.
Machine learning applications can identify cultural and market sub-
groups instead of suitable nations only (Messner, 2022). It could assist
with identifying suppliers and other actors within an IB ecosystem.
When conducting IMS, it is also essential for the MNEs that use AI
technologies to consider the digital capability of the country they
enter because that can either contribute to or detract from their abil-
ity to implement digital strategies in that country operationally.
Fish and Ruby (2009) developed an AI model specifically for small
and medium enterprises (SMEs), offering a resource-efficient solution
to aid in their IMS due to the limited resources often available to
SMEs. Neubert (2018) asserts that AI algorithms can aid in predicting
future international market attractiveness by lean global startups.
More accurate forecasts improve the effectiveness and caliber of mar-
ket selection choices as well as the chance to take part in the expan-
sion of the market in the future (Neubert, 2018).
3.3 | Entry mode choices
Entry modes have been defined by Sharma and Erramilli (2004, p. 4)
as “a structural agreement that allows a firm to implement its product
market strategy in a host country either by carrying out only the mar-
keting operations, or both production and marketing operations there
by itself or in partnership with others.” Technology can allow for bet-
ter entry mode choice and partnership improvement of global connec-
tions through partners and stakeholders. AI is hypothesized to
increase productivity growth, increase economic growth, and provide
new opportunities for international trade (Meltzer, 2018). AI pushes
firms to consider an expanded global web of loosely coupled external
communities through digital platforms and ecosystems, alliances,
global freelancers, open-source communities, online innovation,
crowdsourcing, and the like (Nambisan & Luo, 2022).
AI possesses the capability to efficiently manage corporate rela-
tionships, a critical component for success in IB. Furthermore, AI can
facilitate networking as well as learning (Neubert & Van der
Krogt, 2018) playing a pivotal role in supporting the firms' internation-
alization process. Research also suggests that there might be more
back-shoring activity of MNEs using AI, and Kinkel et al. (2023) exam-
ined this issue for cross-border engagements. For better decision-
making, Kinkel et al. (2023) found a significant positive association
between AI companies' offshoring and back-shoring decisions. Com-
panies' digital competencies and international ambidexterity further
moderate this association between AI and back-shoring.
When exporting, the OECD (2022) reports that AI can be used to
read and understand the descriptions of commercial goods and clas-
sify these against customs codes against the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule. The technology employed here is likely similar to the
machine learning capability utilized for identifying characters on
license plates amid complex backgrounds (Liu et al., 2022). It may also
assist companies to identify their requirements around customs pro-
cedures and duties. Furthermore, it can also be used to identify coun-
terfeited goods.
3.4 | Foreign exchange in international business
Understanding currency trends, movements, and forecasts is paramount
to successful IB decision-making (Güler & Tepecik, 2019). The value of
the currency at any given point in time may result in the IB either mak-
ing a currency loss or gain, either costing or benefiting a firm (Güler &
Tepecik, 2019). When analyzing foreign countries for market analysis, it
is also possible to use AI to predict and understand currency trends and
movements (Güler & Tepecik, 2019; Roth, 2019). For example, the Nik-
kei claimed that an AI system trained on Nikkei data from articles, long-
term dollar-yen trends, commodity prices, and other market indicators
could have the potential to predict future currency trends (Roth, 2019).
Greater accuracy of exchange rate forecasting indeed makes IB currency
decisions more reliable (Güler & Tepecik, 2019).
3.5 | Trade negotiations at an international level
AI also has the potential to be used to improve outcomes from inter-
national trade negotiations (OECD, 2022). For instance, AI could
MENZIES ET AL. 189
better analyze the economic trajectories of different negotiating part-
ners at the country level under different assumptions, including out-
comes contingent on trade negotiation and different country
requirements around economic growth pathways under various forms
of trade liberalization. It can also analyze how these outcomes are
affected in a multiplayer scenario where trade barriers are adjusted
down at different rates, as well as predict the trade response from
countries not party to the negotiation. Brazil has already established
an Intelligent Tech & Trade Initiative that uses AI to improve trade
negotiations (OECD, 2022).
3.6 | Global supply chains and international operations
Frequently used AI technologies in supply chain management (SCM)
are artificial neural networks, agent-based systems, and genetic algo-
rithms (Toorajipour et al., 2021). Artificial neural networks are
software-based AI technologies that simulate the structure of the
human brain, consisting of multiple interconnected neurons in which
information is stored (Soori et al., 2023b). Most of the information is
stored in hidden layers of neurons, which reside between the input
layer and the output layer (Sang, 2021). In the training phase, the arti-
ficial neural networks are fed with a large number of scenarios (Stair
et al., 2021). Once the artificial neural networks has been sufficiently
trained, it can be fed with new scenarios and will calculate the out-
come for each new scenario (Stair et al., 2021). Utilizing this AI tech-
nology has assisted SCM with demand forecasting, inventory and
route optimization, production scheduling, logistics planning, evaluat-
ing and monitoring supplier metrics such as quality, delivery times,
and pricing and risk management (Soori et al., 2023b). For instance,
Zhu and Liu et al. (2022) studied the effectiveness of artificial neural
networks in the risk management of supply chains for prefabricated
buildings. The study first analyzed risk recognition and assessment to
establish an indicator system for risk factors. Based on this informa-
tion, the artificial neural networks predict the risk in the supply chain
with 96–100% accuracy (Zhu & Liu, 2022). The integration of artificial
neural networks within international SCM presents a multifaceted
approach that enhances diverse operations, including demand fore-
casting, inventory optimization, risk management, and supplier metric
evaluation, exemplified by their high predictive accuracy in risk
assessment, illustrating their potential to fortify international supply
chains significantly.
Another important AI technique used in SCM is agent-based sys-
tems (Toorajipour et al., 2021). Agent-based systems are computational
models based on the schema, that is, simple decision rules (Massari &
Giannoccaro, 2021), that simulate the interactions of individual entities,
called agents, along the supply chain that autonomously take action
(Toorajipour et al., 2021). In SCM, the agents act as suppliers, manufac-
turers, distributors, and retailers, allowing the agent-based system to
capture the complexities and emergent behavior of the supply chain and
enable decision-makers to identify potential bottlenecks, predict supply
and demand fluctuations, and design more resilient and efficient supply
chains (Massari & Giannoccaro, 2021). More specifically, Blos et al.
(2018) developed an agent-based system for supply chain disruption
management. The agent-based system was tested for the supply chain
of an aircraft equipment manufacturer, shipping equipment from China
to Brazil via the United States. The agents were trained on a variety of
potential disruption events. It was found that the accuracy of the agent-
based system is highly dependent on the accuracy of the data provided
by the organization for which the agent-based system is developed.
While the agent-based system can be employed by other organizations,
it is necessary to program it with the disruption data from the relevant
organization (Blos et al., 2018). The implementation of agent-based sys-
tems within international SCM offers a sophisticated framework to sim-
ulate and optimize intricate interactions among supply chain entities,
highlighting their potential to fortify and tailor international supply
chains for resilience and adaptability.
Genetic algorithm represents another AI technique that signifi-
cantly improves SCM (Toorajipour et al., 2021). Genetic algorithm is a
computational approach inspired by the principles of natural selection
and biological reproduction (Sang, 2021). Much like how species
evolve and adapt in nature, genetic algorithms work by iteratively
generating a population of potential solutions to a problem and select-
ing the best among them to produce subsequent generations
(Alhijawi & Awajan, 2023). They utilize a combination of mathematical
formulations and learning from previous generations to favor the
best-performing components or genes, which leads to improved solu-
tions over time (Alhijawi & Awajan, 2023). While genetic algorithms at
their core are not AI but analytics techniques when enhanced with AI,
they are able to tackle a wide variety of combinations in decision
problems within complex SCM operations around selling, sourcing,
manufacturing, and delivering goods or services (Toorajipour
et al., 2021). For instance, Nezamoddini et al. (2020) developed an AI-
enhanced genetic algorithm for integrated supply chains to improve
risk management. The study defined risk as unmet demand and con-
sidered three levels of decisions: strategic, tactical, and operational. In
comparison to the regular genetic algorithm, the AI-enhanced genetic
algorithm led to a 30% increase in profits and managed to keep inven-
tory levels at their lowest (Nezamoddini et al., 2020). This example
demonstrates that AI-enhanced genetic algorithms offer a distinctive
approach to optimizing international supply chains to empower
decision-makers to address multifaceted complexities within SCM.
New technologies associated with AI provide opportunities for
operations that can help create production efficiencies, lower costs,
and add value to customers (Beltrami et al., 2021). Smart factories
may use real-time data and AI to run autonomously and flexibly. Using
AI, smart factories can adapt and support different production scenar-
ios and manage different variable production configurations, demand
volumes, and manufacturing technologies (Ancarani et al., 2019). Data
from subsidiary activities can turn into improved business process
automation, productivity, agility, and actionable insights through a
wealth of contextualized machines, sensors, and AI. The proliferation
of AI technologies has driven the digital transformation of IB.
AI can play an important role in optimizing global value chains
(GVCs), as AI can assist in predicting market trends, ensure timely
190 MENZIES ET AL.
delivery of goods, and give businesses a competitive edge on the
global stage (Luo & Zahra, 2023). AI can also assist with enabling orga-
nizations to make data-driven decisions and improve operational effi-
ciency (Luo & Zahra, 2023). Researchers argue that global operations'
ecosystems become digitally connected, allowing codification and AI
to run algorithms and find patterns (Luo & Zahra, 2023).
The OECD (2022) also suggests that AI can generate efficiencies
in the logistics sector by managing smart warehousing and logistics
through improved predictions, better coordination of activities within
warehouses, and better logistics function. From a logistical perspec-
tive, AI is one of the key components of autonomous vehicles, often
used in mining, manufacturing, distribution centers, or even techno-
logically advanced container terminals (Luo & Zahra, 2023). Among
complex Internet of Things (IoT) systems, autonomous vehicles use
machine learning systems to interpret road signs, read maps, and rec-
ognize and react to danger factors (OECD, 2022). Furthermore, AI can
be used in airfreight and shipping to improve scheduling and optimize
the use of load space and capacity (OECD, 2022). The adoption of AI
can, therefore, enable firms to reduce production costs and be nimbler
in responding to changes in consumer demand (Meltzer, 2018).
A particularly challenging task relates to managing inventories
and warehouse space, requiring foresight in identifying changing
trends and optimizing shipments and schedules. AI systems, combined
with IOT and data analytics, can help create “smart warehouses” that rely on sensors, computer vision, and automated processes to
inform decision-making processes related to storage and logistics
(Meltzer, 2018). AI can improve predictions of future trends, such as
changes in consumer demand, and better manage risk along the sup-
ply chain. By enabling businesses to more effectively manage complex
and geographically dispersed production units, such tools significantly
enhance efficiency of GVCs. For example, businesses can use AI to
improve warehouse management, demand prediction, and the accu-
racy of just-in-time manufacturing and delivery. Robotics can increase
productivity and efficiency in packing and inventory inspection and
maintenance of assets along supply chains (Meltzer, 2018).
Meltzer (2018) suggests that AI could also create a trend toward
back-shoring production, as the opportunities for automation and 3D
printing could reduce the need for global supply chains that rely on
low-cost labor in developing countries. Instead, increased production
automation could mean that MNEs could backshore production in
developed and advanced countries rather than in developing low-cost
countries. This phenomenon has been identified by other researchers
as well (Dachs et al., 2019). Therefore, AI can assist with identifying
where, when, and what global resources should be deployed, helping
MNEs to reconfigure, maneuver, and repurpose existing resources
and capabilities for global operations.
3.7 | Sustainability in international business
AI is not only a driver of efficiency but can also be a catalyst for sus-
tainability in IB. It can play a crucial role in advancing the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals by enhancing sustainability
practices, such as reducing carbon footprints and promoting responsi-
ble consumption. AI technologies can also address complex global
challenges, including climate change, poverty, and food insecurity
(Ciulli & Kolk, 2023). It is said that digital technologies will empower
different stakeholder groups as they interact with MNEs, making
interactions more transparent and developing better expectations
around diversity, equality, and social and economic justice (van Zan-
ten & van Tulder, 2018). As a result, technologies such as AI can liber-
alize various groups within a supply chain. As Luo and Zahra (2023)
suggest, AI technologies can help make manufacturing more efficient,
reducing waste and decreasing carbon emission into the atmosphere.
AI may also play a role in lowering greenhouse gas emissions
across GVCs by delivering advanced data-driven insights on carbon
footprints and increasing the efficiency of automated operations at
transport terminals, mines, and so on (Tsolakis et al., 2023). AI tech-
nologies are frequently utilized to calculate the most efficient routes
for couriers, as well as for rubbish removal trucks (Bidgoli, 2021). AI
and enhanced data analytics can potentially improve the environmen-
tal impact of various logistical activities in the long term.
3.8 | International human resource management
International Human Resource Management (IHRM) is defined as the
“management of human resources consistent with the strategic direc-
tion of the MNE in a dynamic, interconnected, and highly competitive
global environment” (Tarique et al., 2022). From an employment per-
spective, individuals working in MNEs may ask themselves whether
manufacturing jobs for electronics will be replaced by machines
that produce electronics more efficiently than human beings
(Ginsberg, 2023). AI could assist with “supporting more informed deci-
sions to meet employees' needs” (Ahi et al., 2022). Research on the
use and integration of AI in IHRM is rising due to its recognized
potential for value creation worldwide (Chowdhury et al., 2023). This
trend signifies a transformative shift in employee management and
overall firm performance, leveraging the innovative capabilities of AI
technologies (Vrontis et al., 2021). In the global competition for top
talent, where traditional recruiting methods struggle to keep pace
with competitive demands, the imperative for employers to adopt
advanced recruiting tools becomes evident (Chen, 2023). Notably, AI
significantly enhances day-to-day HR operations, particularly in
recruitment, leading to improved recruiter efficiency (Chen, 2023). Lit-
erature by Budhwar et al. (2022) advanced that AI integration within
HRM practices is often manifested in human resource planning,
recruitment and selection, training and development, compensation
and benefits, and performance management. For instance, the long
time it takes for humans to undertake the HRM function of planning,
selection, and recruitment is replaced by AI with its ability to quickly
process complex data and provide accurate information (Budhwar
et al., 2022). In the view of Budhwar et al. (2022), human-AI configu-
ration centers on employee-customer engagement, peer-to-peer
interaction, especially within the workspace, and management-
to-team engagement. Simply, the adoption of AI within the IHRM
MENZIES ET AL. 191
function is seen as a decision-support tool (Pessach et al., 2020).
Despite these advancements, comprehensive research on the utiliza-
tion and implementation of AI in IHRM remains limited and fragmen-
ted, signaling a need for further exploration of this evolving field
(Budhwar et al., 2022). As with any emerging technology, adopting AI
in IHRM brings forth both opportunities and challenges (Vrontis
et al., 2021).
The benefits and opportunities of the adoption of AI in HRM are
notably seen in recruitment, improved HRM strategies, task automa-
tion, and performance enhancement. The AI technologies most
employed in HRM are natural language processing, artificial neural
networks, and deep learning. Deep learning refers to the ability of a
computer to perform tasks that are natural for humans; however,
doing so with accuracy is often higher than that of humans
(Chen, 2023). Artificial neural networks are software-based AI tech-
nologies that simulate the structure of the human brain, consisting of
multiple interconnected neurons in which the information is stored
(Soori et al., 2023b). The benefits of AI applications are utilized in each
stage of the recruitment process (Chen, 2023), that is, job promotion,
applicant screening, applicant assessment, and coordination (Black &
van Esch, 2020). In job advertisements, AI is utilized for scraping data
from Social Media platforms to ensure high-profile candidates who
are not actively looking for jobs are presented with pop-ups or ban-
ners showcasing the job opportunity (Campbell et al., 2020). AI facili-
tates application screening by establishing a model of the ideal
candidate based on previous successful candidates, thereby predicting
the most suitable candidate (Ore & Sposato, 2021). In candidate
assessment, AI technologies can assist with developing interview
questions and gamified tasks to assess characteristics such as risk pro-
pensity (Black & van Esch, 2020). In recruitment coordination, AI tech-
nology can assist in multiple ways, according to Black and van Esch
(2020). For instance, candidates may be provided with the opportu-
nity to submit their LinkedIn profile instead of a resume. The AI sys-
tem then completes the resume on behalf of the applicant.
Furthermore, chatbots may inform applicants about the stage of
their application and answer relevant questions about the company,
salary, appropriate attire for the interview, or the start date (Black &
van Esch, 2020). This shows that AI revolutionizes recruitment pro-
cesses, improves efficiency, and reduces response times
(Horodyski, 2023), which may result in better applicant engagement.
At the task level, AI enables a streamlined application process, improv-
ing candidate experiences and causing a ripple effect that fosters a
favorable employer image, boosting employer branding and enabling
more diversified recruitment strategies (Ore & Sposato, 2021). AI sys-
tems can potentially deal with cognitive selection biases under race,
gender, and sexual orientation (Budhwar et al., 2022). As MNEs often
deal with heterogeneous labor forces, it is only prudent that high
degrees of objectivity and neutrality are undertaken during selection
and recruitment processes, which is made possible by leveraging the
capabilities of AI (Budhwar et al., 2022).
Furthermore, the integration of AI into HRM has strategic impli-
cations, fundamentally reshaping job design and work dynamics within
the IB (Vrontis et al., 2021). Moreover, natural language processing
and machine learning, that is, machines learning from experience with-
out ongoing human intervention (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2019), facilitate
support for journalists by automating basic tasks like scriptwriting,
freeing up time for investigative reporting and generating news at a
faster pace and larger scale (Jung et al., 2017). Advancing to the job
level, entire job functions are starting to be replaced with AI technol-
ogy (Vrontis et al., 2021). Notably, the advent of virtual assistant soft-
ware such as Siri or Cortana exemplifies this shift, revolutionizing
customer support by providing 24/7 assistance, which is especially
advantageous for IBs seeking to penetrate foreign markets without
the need for a physical presence (Glavas et al., 2019).
From a workforce planning, training, and development perspec-
tive, AI algorithms can accurately assess and identify the skills needed
by existing employees. This, in essence, guides the drafting and devel-
opment of training and development programs and workforces
(Budhwar et al., 2022). In the same vein, AI can estimate and/or deter-
mine the right levels of employee compensation with fewer biases
and subjectivity (Budhwar et al., 2022).
3.9 | Managing across cultures
According to the OECD (2022), virtual assistants may have a strong
role in better managing relations between people of different cul-
tures. For instance, AI systems can utilize software and programs
that can rely on natural language processing to assist with transla-
tion, and this automation can facilitate simpler communications in
global virtual teams. Zoom has the capability to conduct simulta-
neous translation between languages to facilitate cross-cultural
meetings (Zoom, 2023). This is cheaper, more efficient, and more
effective than paying human translators to do the job. AI can also
respond to spoken or written commands and questions. Previous
work identifies that improving communication between people of
different cultures can increase the amount of IB occurring, and
therefore, AI should have beneficial effects on cross-cultural collabo-
rations (Szkudlarek et al., 2020).
3.10 | International marketing
The use of AI in international marketing is gaining increasing attention,
as explored by Kopalle et al. (2022). AI's role in this domain is multi-
faceted: it includes the deployment of virtual assistants and chatbots,
which help reduce costs, answer consumer inquiries, and enhance
customer relations. Moreover, AI aids in refining the customization
and personalization of services and products (OECD, 2022). AI sys-
tems are instrumental in augmenting consumer experiences and tailor-
ing content to individual preferences (Huang & Rust, 2022).
Additionally, they contribute to more precise predictions in targeted
advertising, optimizing the reach and effectiveness of marketing cam-
paigns for various products and services.
MT can help respond to increased demand for niche services
traded across borders, and it can assist with professional document
192 MENZIES ET AL.
translations, audio-visual content translation, remote events, and
meeting interpretations (Horváth, 2022). Ethical concerns may arise
when employing MT for formal documents like contracts due to
potential biases in the AI's training data, data processing by external
companies, and undisclosed decision-making processes within the AI
system (Horváth, 2022). Hence, in the context of legal contracts, the
issue of accountability for potential translation errors remains unre-
solved, and it is suggested that humans conduct back translation to
reduce computer errors.
MT can also assist when conducting market research and surveys
or improving the personalization and customization of services
(OECD, 2022). Previous research indicates the benefits of MT in
Spanish-speaking markets (Brynjolfsson et al., 2018). These
researchers find that automatic MT facilitates online sales to foreign
markets, as the electronic MT learns how to translate different lan-
guages and uses tailored engineering to make it easier for buyers to
search and understand the details of items that are not listed in their
language (Brynjolfsson et al., 2018). This further enables digital plat-
forms to drive international trade and business and increase sales, as
in the case of eBay (Meltzer, 2018).
AI may also assist in international marketing by managing a firm's
brand in global markets and helping with the globalization of products
(Kopalle et al., 2022). Chatbots are common for customer-centric
businesses; therefore, AI could assist IBs in delivering their communi-
cations to potential and actual clients in foreign countries. In this
regard, it may assist with answering questions or helping customers
order their products or services online and be a more efficient way of
engaging with customers.
4 | DISCUSSION
Overall, our literature review observed that a small body of literature
examines AI and IB-type issues. Popular types of work included for-
eign exchange studies and global supply chains. There was also some
interest from an IMS perspective. Yet, there could be more research
to explore this topic or develop models using AI to more accurately
predict foreign market choices, conduct market analysis, and suggest
entry mode choices when entering markets. There was also research
on how AI could be used in the various aspects of IHRM, managing
across cultures, and in international marketing. As these papers sug-
gested, AI has the potential to significantly enhance efficiency in vari-
ous tasks, make more accurate predictions (such as in foreign
exchange and IMS), and automate and augment activities. Although
the adoption of AI in IB offers numerous advantages, it also presents
challenges.
4.1 | Challenges of using AI in IBs
As we identify in Figure 3, the challenges of using AI in International
extends to an employee, country/international, and organizational
perspective.
From an employee perspective, concerns around potential job dis-
placement are among the challenges organizations face (Vrontis
et al., 2021). This may lead to a shift in work structure and the nature
of work (Ahi et al., 2022). However, the opportunities presented by
AI, such as automation of manual tasks, enhancing personalization,
and improving customer engagement, may outweigh the challenges
(Vrontis et al., 2021). Reconfiguring work because of AI-IHRM integra-
tion brings employee apathy and probable attrition leading to a short-
term decrease in worker productivity (Budhwar et al., 2022). Reskilling
to augment the required work reconfiguration also becomes problem-
atic, especially in the short run. At the global level of workforce distri-
bution, especially within MNEs, ethical issues become problematic in
the adoption of AI for IHRM productivity (Budhwar et al., 2022). The
nonavailability of global standards and regulations to govern AI adop-
tion brings many ethical challenges when handling different employee
groups within the workplace and their employee data (Stahl, 2021).
While concerns exist regarding AI's potential to replace recruiters
entirely, this is unlikely, given that AI systems have been designed to
relieve recruiters from mundane tasks in the recruitment process
(Chen, 2023). Instead, human-AI collaboration focuses on improving
decision-making (Vrontis et al., 2021), as AI systems possess far
greater analytical and computational information processing capacity
than humans, which allows them to swiftly analyze large datasets,
identify patterns, and derive insights. In contrast, humans utilize intui-
tive approaches to decision-making (Jarrahi, 2018). This underscores
the principle of intelligent augmentation, advocating for AI systems to
augment rather than replace human capabilities (Jarrahi, 2018).
Although AI promises to mitigate recruiter bias by eliminating subjec-
tive criteria, the potential amplification of bias arises from AI systems
trained on biased datasets (Chowdhury et al., 2023). This was evident
by Amazon's recruitment AI inevitably excluding female candidates
due to biased training data, as the AI system had been trained on
resumes from high-performing job incumbents over the past 10 years,
which happened to be only males (Dastin, 2018). The AI system solely
selected male candidates in line with the training data. Amazon has
since discontinued this AI system (Dastin, 2018). One negative for
employees may be a breach of privacy in the workplace, as organiza-
tions may use employee data to facilitate their machine learning and
data analytics.
From a country/international level, the OECD (2022) points out
challenges to using AI across borders, which include government pro-
tectionist policies preventing organizations from providing digital ser-
vices across countries. Trade agreements and regulations around AI
are also lacking or nonexistent, especially in developing countries that
may have other more pressing issues to attend to. Other challenges
pertain to the regulatory and policy environment around AI, including
cyber security and privacy of people's data, especially as these may
need to be shared across countries (Marwala, 2023). AI regulation at
an international level is important, and countries are currently discuss-
ing these issues at the World Trade Organization level or in regional
trade agreements on the implications of AI (Jones, 2023). As countries
grapple with different aspects of technology, the number of national
and international AI regulatory instruments will likely increase, which
MENZIES ET AL. 193
might impede innovation (OECD, 2022). Another challenge of AI is
the widening gap in the adoption and implementation of AI among
countries, companies, and workers, especially in developing versus
developed countries (Fornes & Altamira, 2023). This may mean some
countries will significantly benefit from the adoption of AI, while other
countries will lag.
From an organizational perspective, limited sector-specific data,
especially within industry and services sectors, has been found in the
literature to be one of the challenges to using AI in IB (Neubert & Van
der Krogt, 2018). Other hindrances to AI adoption have been the lack
of clarity on the benefits of the software solution, lack of firm-specific
relevance, specific firm-level AI management challenges, and
employee training costs (Neubert & Van der Krogt, 2018).
Access to trained IT professionals and programmers is key for
developing AI solutions, and there appear to be barriers to the move-
ment of people across countries with these skills. Lowering these bar-
riers would facilitate the transfer of AI-related knowledge and skills
(OECD, 2022). There also appear to be large talent gaps in AI-trained
staff, requiring combined solutions from governments, organizations,
and educational providers to address this issue (Tamayo et al., 2023).
Data localization measures that restrict the ability to move data glob-
ally will reduce the capacity to develop tailored AI capacities
(Meltzer, 2018).
For decades, AI has been expected to expand automation and
speed up job losses for low-skill, blue-collar workers in the
manufacturing field (Ginsberg, 2023). With the emergence of genera-
tive AI, such as ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard, a reversal has been initiated,
as these new AI technologies excel at accomplishing tasks traditionally
performed by knowledge workers, potentially rendering some of their
roles redundant (Cain Miller & Cox, 2023). It will be a continued chal-
lenge for organizations to transition these workers.
4.2 | Limitations and suggestions for future research
Our study, while thorough, encountered certain limitations that future
research could address. A key limitation is the scope of our database
search. Expanding future searches to include databases like Google
Scholar and Scopus additionally could uncover further insights.
Another limitation is the limited number of existing studies on AI in
IB. As AI is a rapidly evolving field, more studies are likely to emerge,
enriching future reviews with a broader spectrum of data and per-
spectives. It is essential for future research to continuously adapt to
the swift advancements in AI, ensuring that findings remain relevant
and reflective of the latest technological developments in the
realm of IB.
In this article, we explored past research examining how AI can be
used in the various IB strategies, practices, and activities. Despite this,
our review suggests many areas for future research that can explore
the role of emerging technologies, such as AI, for IB.
There has been a growing interest in the approaches of AI and
business; however, there has been limited attention to the bigger pic-
ture of how AI may require a range of organizational changes at the
organizational, behavioral, and managerial levels (Luo & Zahra, 2023).
AI may have the impact of reconfiguring the different types of inter-
national strategies and practices MNEs use, which deserves close
analysis for future study. Researchers could use theories of change,
such as Lewin's three-stage change model (Hussain et al., 2018) to
explore change around AI implementation in IB.
From an IMS perspective, research could examine how AI can
contribute to better IB data collection, decision-making, and market
selection choices. Can AI create better models, algorithms, learning,
and tools to make the most efficient and effective decisions around
F IGURE 3 Challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in international businesses.
194 MENZIES ET AL.
market choice? Researchers could use established IMS models such as
the CAGE distance model (Ghemawhat, 2001) or more recent models
(Ozturk et al., 2015) to develop AI-inspired models that enhance bet-
ter IMS decision-making. Future researchers could examine the extent
to which AI could be used to make decisions around entry mode
choice. For example, can Dunning's eclectic/OLI paradigm
(Dunning, 2001) be created into an AI model that helps MNEs decide
what entry mode to choose, given a particular country, the organiza-
tion's resources, and competitive conditions?
Raisch and Krakowski (2021) provide theoretical insights into the
automation versus augmentation paradox. MNEs will need to assess
the degree to which they wish to automate processes and activities
within their IB or whether they see AI augmenting work and examine
the extent to which different IB strategies and practices should be
automated or augmented (Raisch & Krakowski, 2021), from the per-
spective of AI.
Future studies could also examine how AI can assist in managing
cross-cultural relations between people of different countries in the
MNE. Can AI natural language processing improve global virtual
teams' relations, particularly natural language processing and transla-
tion? Questions about whether “AI can help reduce the possibility for
misunderstanding and increase the performance of global virtual
teams?” could be the focus of future research and theorizing.
There also appear to remain grey areas that need further investi-
gation by researchers when considering AI and IHRM. Empirically and
theoretically, the adoption of AI within digitalized co-working space
has received very little inroads (Grønsund & Aanestad, 2020). The
cross-country dynamics within co-working space and AI adoption
remain elusive and underresearched. While there have been inroads
on how AI can make the various IHRM practices more efficient, some
of the issues that staff might face due to AI implementation, such as
ethics and privacy (Stahl, 2021), could be the focus of future studies.
Future studies could also examine the ethical considerations of AI
adoption in IB, studying privacy, bias, and the societal impact of AI-
driven decisions. What are the best practices for managing and imple-
menting AI systems in a business? In addition, future researchers
could investigate the regulatory challenges, for example, data protec-
tion, intellectual property, and compliance with international laws
associated with AI deployment across different countries and regions
(Loureiro et al., 2021).
While some studies have presented a negative story about the
increased use of AI technology, others have focused on the advan-
tages without fully recognizing some adverse effects on society. In
the future, research may investigate the role that AI plays in easing
the operations of IB and fostering growth in emerging economies, tak-
ing into account the specific problems and opportunities given by
these diverse environments.
Future research could examine how AI technology can propel
innovation in IB, emphasizing product development, service delivery,
and market distinction. A relevant research question could be how
businesses can more effectively utilize deep learning generative
models to automate knowledge creation. How can this be diffused
throughout the MNE to create new products, services, and processes?
The diffusion of innovation theory (Rogers, 2003) may be a useful the-
oretical perspective to explore this.
4.3 | Managerial implications for IBs
Research suggests that changes in global organizations necessitate
changes in team composition and decision-making processes (Luo &
Zahra, 2023). Chief Technology Officers need to understand what is
required to implement technological change around AI and how staff
need to be trained to build this capability. Staff across the business
may require training in cloud computing, AI, and various software to
be digitally capable. Even staff who are not IT staff or programmers
may benefit from understanding the capabilities of AI. This knowl-
edge, training, and understanding may be a breeding ground for inno-
vation from an organizational, product, and process perspective. It
may be important for MNEs to develop digital mindfulness and trans-
formational leadership within their organizations as a change process.
It will be important for MNEs to create digital architectures and to
center on organizational architecture, with both mutually complemen-
tary and supportive of each other. The digital architecture should sup-
port interoperability, integration, and extension (Nambisan &
Luo, 2022), supported by data-driven, end-to-end business processes
based on industrial AI (Kohli & Melville, 2019). Given that highly
trained knowledge workers will dominate operations, MNE leaders
need to reconsider their cultures, create greater employee participa-
tion opportunities, and counteract employee concerns about privacy,
excessive organizational control, and dehumanization (Luo &
Zahra, 2023). MNEs must build their absorptive capacity because AI is
an emerging technology, and it builds on other emerging technologies
that will embody complex and radically new knowledge that is difficult
to comprehend and absorb.
Luo and Zahra (2023) provide insights on implementing technolo-
gies such as AI into IBs and suggest that it should be embedded into
business processes to assist with running operations. They suggest
that the combination of digitalization, intelligence, technology, and
innovation gives MNEs a plethora of opportunities as well as substan-
tial shifts in the manner in which they extend their worldwide reach,
facilitate connections with both internal and external stakeholders,
and streamline global operations in a manner that is both more effi-
cient and productive (Luo & Zahra, 2023). They further suggest orga-
nizations should build analytics and processes for IB in an
independent manner at the “Edge” of a central cloud infrastructure;
they recommended exploring the benefits of conducting analytics at
the edge for IB operations, enabling real-time decision-making at the
point of data generation. GVCs should be centered around digital con-
nectivity, AI, and blockchains, which should be combined with techno-
logical advancement and creative thinking. Digital platforms should be
created so that internal members (employees) are able to collaborate
with external members.
We also suggest employing AI professionals to enhance the orga-
nization's AI capability. This means it is important to undergo organi-
zational change and build up digital technologies and dynamic
MENZIES ET AL. 195
capabilities to help address and implement technological change. It is
also important to build up intelligent machines and smart automation
of business activities, advancing a workplace vision that values inter-
connectivity, smart automation, machine learning, and real-time data
(Ahi et al., 2022).
It will be important for managers to navigate the ethical and legal
landscape of AI, ensuring compliance with international standards and
resolving concerns connected to data privacy and security. Further-
more, the incorporation of AI may entail the workforce's upskilling
and the redefinition of job responsibilities. This scenario calls for pro-
active leadership to manage the transition and cultivate a culture of
continuous learning. In addition, as AI-driven breakthroughs continue
to transform industries, managers need to remain sensitive to disrup-
tions and adaptable in modifying company strategies to stay ahead of
the curve. Managers are positioned to be important orchestrators
of this technological growth within their organizations since the effi-
cient application of AI in IB requires strategic preparation, thoughtful
execution, and a commitment to ethical and privacy issues.
5 | CONCLUSIONS
AI is transforming many facets of operations and strategy, with signifi-
cant practical ramifications for MNEs and IBs. Decision-making is one
crucial area where AI-driven analytics leverage massive datasets to
produce actionable insights, assisting businesses in making timely and
well-informed decisions across international marketplaces
(Brynjolfsson & Mcafee, 2017; Davenport et al., 2020). Companies
may anticipate consumer behavior, market trends, and geopolitical
risks using AI-powered predictive analytics. This allows for proactive
measures to manage uncertainties in IB and investments
( _Zukrowska, 2021).
In this article, we contributed to the academic discourse by deliv-
ering a narrative literature review that explores the dynamic ways in
which IBs can integrate AI into their diverse strategies, activities, and
practices. This exploration is not only insightful but pivotal for IBs
aspiring to implement AI in their business models effectively. We
identify and address the multifaceted challenges associated with
implementing AI in IB, highlighting the complex implications at
employee, organizational, and international levels. Furthermore, our
work makes a substantial contribution to the field by offering sugges-
tions for future research directions, thereby setting a new agenda for
scholarly inquiry in this rapidly evolving domain.
The use of AI in IB is rapidly transforming global operations. AI
technologies are essential tools for optimizing GVCs, making
data-driven decisions, and enhancing sustainability practices.
While challenges exist, the opportunities offered by AI are immense,
and the adoption of these technologies is critical. As the digital revolu-
tion continues, IBs must harness the power of AI to thrive in an ever-
evolving global marketplace. MNEs/IBs need to look at how they can
build capabilities to be AI literate and how to implement AI for better
IB processes, efficiency, and success.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Open access publishing facilitated by University of the Sunshine
Coast, as part of the Wiley - University of the Sunshine Coast agree-
ment via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were gener-
ated or analysed during the current study.
ORCID
Jane Menzies https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-8586
Bianka Sabert https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2942-7660
Rohail Hassan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7825-0283
REFERENCES
Ahi, A. A., Sinkovics, N., Shildibekov, Y., Sinkovics, R. R., & Mehandjiev, N.
(2022). Advanced technologies and international business: A multidis-
ciplinary analysis of the literature. International Business Review, 31(4),
101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101967
Alhijawi, B., & Awajan, A. (2023). Genetic algorithms: Theory, genetic oper-
ators, solutions, and applications. Evolutionary Intelligence. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12065-023-00822-6
Allal-Chérif, O., Sim�on-Moya, V., & Ballester, A. C. C. (2021). Intelligent
purchasing: How artificial intelligence can redefine the purchasing
function. Journal of Business Research, 124, 69–76. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.050
Alvarez-Mitchell, M. (2023). Creatives on strike: Talent versus technology.
Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagen
cycouncil/2023/10/26/creatives-on-strike-talent-versus-technology/
?sh=4352a92e69cb
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & Mascali, F. (2019). Backshoring strategy and
the adoption of Industry 4.0: Evidence from Europe. Journal of World
Business, 54(4), 360–371. Andersen, P. H., & Strandskov, J. (1998). International market selection: A
cognitive mapping perspective. Journal of Global Marketing, 11(3),
65–84. Bag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2021). An integrated artificial
intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing
rational decision making for improving firm performance. Industrial
Marketing Management, 92(92), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. indmarman.2020.12.001
Beltrami, M., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J., & Sartor, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and
sustainability: Towards conceptualization and theory. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 312, 127733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.
2021.127733
Benito, G. R. G., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Mudambi, R., Pedersen, T., &
Tallman, S. (2022). The future of global strategy. Global Strategy Jour-
nal, 12(3), 421–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1464 Bidgoli, H. (2021). MIS: Management information systems. Cengage.
Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2020). AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and
how should a manager use it? Business Horizons, 63(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.12.001
Blos, M. F., da Silva, R. M., & Wee, H.-M. (2018). A framework for design-
ing supply chain disruptions management considering productive sys-
tems and carrier viewpoints. International Journal of Production
Research, 56(15), 5045–5061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.
2018.1442943
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2018). Does machine translation affect
international trade? Evidence from a large digital platform. Manage-
ment Science, 65(12), 5449–5460.
196 MENZIES ET AL.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mcafee, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence, for real. Har-
vard Business Review, 1–31. Budhwar, P., Malik, A., De Silva, M. T. T., & Thevisuthan, P. (2022). Artifi-
cial intelligence—Challenges and opportunities for international HRM:
A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 33(6), 1065–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/
09585192.2022.2035161
Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., & Joshi, R. (2018). Notes From
the Ai Frontier: Modeling the Impact of AI on the World Economy.
McKinsey. Retrieved 01/12/2023 from https://www.mckinsey.com/
featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/notes-from-the-ai-frontier-mo
deling-the-impact-of-ai-on-the-world-economy
Cain Miller, C., & Cox, C. (2023). In reversal because of AI, office jobs are
now more at risk. New York Times Retrieved from https://www.
nytimes.com/2023/08/24/upshot/artificial-intelligence-jobs.html
Campbell, C., Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Tsao, H.-Y., & Mavrommatis, A.
(2020). From data to action: How marketers can leverage AI. Busi-
ness Horizons, 63(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.
2019.12.002
Castellacci, F., & Viñas-Bardolet, C. (2019). Internet use and job satisfac-
tion. Computers in Human Behavior, 90(141–152), 141–152. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.001
Chen, Z. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence:
Removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology and
Work, 25(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0 Chen, W., & Kamal, F. (2016). The impact of information and communica-
tion technology adoption on multinational firm boundary decisions.
Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 563–576. Retrieved
from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43907591
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-
Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of
artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capa-
bility framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100899.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2023). International business, digital technologies and
sustainable development: Connecting the dots. Journal of World Busi-
ness, 58(4), 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101445
Dachs, B., Kinkel, S., & Jäger, A. (2019). Bringing it all back home? Back-
shoring of manufacturing activities and the adoption of Industry 4.0
technologies. Journal of World Business, 54(6), 101017. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101017
Dastin, J. (2018). Insight—Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that
showed bias against women. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.
com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-
secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN
1MK08G/
Davenport, T. D., Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., & Wilson, H. J. (2020). Arti-
ficial intelligence: The insights you need from Harvard business
review.
Dillon, S. M., Glavas, C., & Mathews, S. (2020). Digitally immersive, interna-
tional entrepreneurial experiences. International Business Review, 29(6),
101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101739
Dunning, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international produc-
tion: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics
of Business, 8(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357151011
0051441
Elhadi, A. (2023). Collaborative translation and meaning making: Using
English language learners' first language as a resource for language learn-
ing and academic achievement in the classroom. ProQuest Dissertations
Publishing.
Fish, K., & Ruby, P. (2009). An artificial intelligence foreing market screeing
method for small business. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 13,
65–81. Fleck, J. (2021). Development and establishment in artificial intelligence. In
Artificial intelligence (pp. 2–10). Routledge Library Editions.
Fornes, G., & Altamira, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and international
business. In G. Fornes & M. Altamira (Eds.), Digitalization, technology
and global business: How technology is shaping value creation across bor-
ders (pp. 71–90). Springer International Publishing. Ghemawhat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global
expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147. Ginsberg, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and international business deci-
sions. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertginsburg/
2023/10/06/artificial-intelligence-and-international-business-decision
s/?sh=47afac70718f
Glavas, C., Mathews, S., & Russell-Bennett, R. (2019). Knowledge acquisi-
tion via internet-enabled platforms. International Marketing Review,
36(1), 74–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-02-2017-0041
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of
14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information &
Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842. 2009.00848.x
Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020). Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging
human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Infor-
mation Systems, 29(2), 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.
101614
Güler, K., & Tepecik, A. (2019). Exchange rates' change by using economic
data with artificial intelligence and forecasting the crisis. Procedia Com-
puter Science, 158, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.
09.057
Haan, K., & Watts, R. (2023). How businesses are using artificial intelli-
gence in 2023. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/
business/software/ai-in-business/
Horodyski, P. (2023). Applicants' perception of artificial intelligence in the
recruitment process. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11,
100303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100303
Horváth, I. (2022). AI in interpreting: Ethical considerations. Across Lan-
guages and Cultures, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2022. 00108
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2022). A framework for collaborative artificial
intelligence in marketing. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 209–223. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001
Hughes, C. (2023). Maximizing business potential with AI-generated plans:
Tools and tips for success. Forbes Business Council. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/05/03/m
aximizing-business-potential-with-ai-generated-plans-tools-and-tips-f
or-success/?sh=75d025c06fd3
Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M.
(2018). Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of
leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal
of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-
AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons,
61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 Jones, E. (2023). Digital disruption: Artificial intelligence and international
trade policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(1), 70–84. https:// doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac049
Jung, J., Song, H., Kim, Y., Im, H., & Oh, S. (2017). Intrusion of software
robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of
news written by algorithms and human journalists. Computers in
Human Behaviour, 71, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017. 02.022
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest
in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of
artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Kinkel, S., Capestro, M., Di Maria, E., & Bettiol, M. (2023). Artificial intelli-
gence and relocation of production activities: An empirical cross-
national study. International Journal of Production Economics, 261,
108890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108890
MENZIES ET AL. 197
Kohli, R., & Melville, N. P. (2019). Digital innovation: A review and synthe-
sis. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 200–223. https://doi.org/10. 1111/isj.12193
Kopalle, P. K., Gangwar, M., Kaplan, A., Ramachandran, D., Reinartz, W., &
Rindfleisch, A. (2022). Examining artificial intelligence (AI) technologies
in marketing via a global lens: Current trends and future research
opportunities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2),
522–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.11.002
Li, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Analysis on the application of artificial
intelligence in cross-border E-commerce. Paper presented at the 6th
Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary
Humanity Development (SSCHD 2020).
Liu, L., Wang, Y., & Chi, W. (2022). Image recognition technology based on
machine learning. IEEE Access, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.
2020.3021590
Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Tussyadiah, I. (2021). Artificial intelli-
gence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal
of Business Research, 129, 911–926. Luo, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2023). Industry 4.0 in international business
research. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00577-9
Malik, A., Budhwar, P., & Kazmi, B. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI)-
assisted HRM: Towards an extended strategic framework. Human
Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100940. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.hrmr.2022.100940
Manning, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence definitions. HAI Stanford
University.
Marwala, T. (2023). AI and international relations—A whole new minefield
to navigate. Retrieved from https://unu.edu/article/ai-and-
international-relations-whole-new-minefield-navigate
Massari, G. F., & Giannoccaro, I. (2021). Investigating the effect of horizon-
tal coopetition on supply chain resilience in complex and turbulent
environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 237,
108150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108150
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A pro-
posal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelli-
gence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.
1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
Meltzer, J. P. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on international
trade. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-
impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-international-trade/
Messner, W. (2022). Advancing our understanding of cultural heterogene-
ity with unsupervised machine learning. Journal of International Man-
agement, 28(2), 100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.
100885
Nambisan, S., & Luo, Y. (2022). The digital multinational: Navigating the new
normal in global business. MIT Press.
Neubert, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on the speed of interna-
tionalization of lean global startups. Technology Innovation Manage-
ment Review, 8(5), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1158
Neubert, M., & Van der Krogt, A. (2018). Impact of business intelligence
solutions on export performance of software firms in emerging econo-
mies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(9), 39–49. https:// doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1185
Nezamoddini, N., Gholami, A., & Aqlan, F. (2020). A risk-based optimiza-
tion framework for integrated supply chains using genetic algorithm
and artificial neural networks. International Journal of Production Eco-
nomics, 225, 107569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107569
Nuttal, K. (2022). 10 use cases for AI across industries. Retrieved from
https://www.deloitte.com/au/en/services/consulting/perspectives/
10-use-cases-for-ai-across-industries.html
OECD. (2022). Artificial intelligence and international trade. Retrieved
from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/13212d3e-en.pdf?item
Id=/content/paper/13212d3e-en&mimeType=pdf
Ore, O., & Sposato, M. (2021). Opportunities and risks of artificial
intelligence in recruitment and selection. International Journal of Orga-
nizational Analysis, 30(6), 1771–1782. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-
07-2020-2291
Ozturk, A., Joiner, E., & Cavusgil, S. (2015). Delineating foreign market
potential: A tool for international market selection. Thunderbird Inter-
national Business Review, 57, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.
21686
Palmatier, R., Houston, M., & Hulland, J. (2017). Review articles: Purpose,
process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46,
1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4 Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O'Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific
procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-
4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Paul, J., & Menzies, J. (2023). Developing classic systematic literature
reviews to advance knowledge: Dos and don'ts. European Management
Journal, 41(6), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.11.006
Pessach, D., Singer, G., Avrahami, D., Chalutz Ben-Gal, H., Shmueli, E., &
Ben-Gal, I. (2020). Employees recruitment: A prescriptive analytics
approach via machine learning and mathematical programming. Deci-
sion Support Systems, 134, 113290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.
2020.113290
Prentice, C., Dominique Lopes, S., & Wang, X. (2020). Emotional intelli-
gence or artificial intelligence– An employee perspective. Journal of
Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(4), 377–403. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/19368623.2019.1647124
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management:
The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management
Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth edition ed.). Free Press.
Roth, M. (2019). AI in foreign exchange trading (Forex)—Current state of
the sector. Retrieved from https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/ai-
in-foreign-exchange-trading-forex-current-state-of-the-sector/
Sang, B. (2021). Application of genetic algorithm and BP neural network in
supply chain finance under information sharing. Journal of Computa-
tional and Applied Mathematics, 384, 113170. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.cam.2020.113170
Satheesh, M. K., Samala, N., & Rodriguez, R. V. (2020). Role of Ai-induced
chatbot in enhancing customer relationship management in the bank-
ing industry. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, 6(4), 1320–1323. Sharma, V. M., & Erramilli, M. K. (2004). Resource-based explanation of
entry mode choice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2004.11658509
Shi, J. (2022). Research on optimization of cross-border e-commerce logis-
tics distribution network in the context of artificial intelligence. Mobile
Information Systems, 2022, 3022280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/
3022280
Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023a). Artificial intelligence, machine
learning and deep learning in advanced robotics: A review. Cognitive
Robotics, 3, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001 Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023b). Artificial neural networks in
supply chain management, a review. Journal of Economy and Technol-
ogy, 1, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2023.11.002 Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem
perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies.
Stair, R. M., Reynolds, G. W., Bryant, J., Frydenberg, M., Greenberg, H., &
Schell, G. P. (2021). Principles of information systems (14th ed.).
Cengage.
Stallkamp, M., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2021). Platforms without borders? The
international strategies of digital platform firms. Global Strategy Jour-
nal, 11(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1336 Szkudlarek, B., Osland, J. S., Nardon, L., & Zander, L. (2020). Communica-
tion and culture in international business—Moving the field forward.
198 MENZIES ET AL.
Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jwb.2020.101126
Tamayo, J., Doumi, L., Goel, S., Kovács-Ondrejkovic, O., & Sadun, R.
(2023). Reskilling in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review.
Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in
human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. Califor-
nia Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0008125619867910
Tarique, I., Briscoe, D. R., & Schuler, R. S. (2022). International human
resource management. Policies and practices for multinational enterprises.
Routledge.
Toorajipour, R., Sohrabpour, V., Nazarpour, A., Oghazi, P., & Fischl, M.
(2021). Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A system-
atic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 122, 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.009
Tsolakis, N., Schumacher, R., Dora, M., & Kumar, M. (2023). Artificial intelli-
gence and blockchain implementation in supply chains: A pathway to
sustainability and data monetisation? Annals of Operations Research,
327(1), 157–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04785-2 van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and
the sustainable development goals: An institutional approach to corpo-
rate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3), 208– 233. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E.
(2021). Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and
human resource management: A systematic review. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1237–1266. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., &
Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence
(AI) on firm performance: The business value of AI-based transforma-
tion projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893–1924. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411
Xie, D., & He, Y. (2022). Marketing strategy of rural tourism based on big
data and artificial intelligence. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9154351
Zhu, J. (2021). Application analysis of artificial intelligence technology in the
development of cross-border E-commerce. Paper presented at the 2021
3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced
Manufacture.
Zhu, T., & Liu, G. (2022). A novel hybrid methodology to study the risk
management of prefabricated building supply chains: An outlook for
sustainability. Sustainability, 15(1), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/
su15010361
Zoom. (2023). Viewing captions in another language. Retrieved from
https://support.zoom.com/hc/en/article?id=zm_kb&sysparm_article=
KB0060844 _Zukrowska, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) and international trade. In
A. Visvizi & M. Bodziany (Eds.), Advanced sciences and technologies for
security applications (pp. 225–240). World Health Organization.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
Dr Jane Menzies is a senior lecturer in International Business, and
Program Coordinator for the Master of Business Administration
and Postgraduate Programs at University of the Sunshine Coast.
Her research interests are in internationalization of firms, transi-
tional issues of international students, women's entrepreneurship,
and gender issues in organizations. Jane has published in Interna-
tional Business Review, Gender & Education, European Management
Journal, Thunderbird International Business Review, International
Journal of Consumer Studies, International Journal of Conflict Man-
agement, Management International Review, Human Resource Man-
agement Review, International Trade Journal, Australian Journal of
Career Development, and a range of education journals. Jane pub-
lished a book with Routledge in 2018 on “Innovation and Interna-
tionalisation: Australian SMEs in China.” Jane has over the years
been awarded grants at the Australia China Council (2013) and
more recently at the Council for Australia Latin America Relations
(2022) both at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
Dr Bianka Sabert is a sessional academic at the University of the
Sunshine Coast. Her main teaching areas are in Management and
IT for Business. Her research primarily focuses on Strategic Man-
agement and International Non-Profit Organizations. However,
with over 10 years of experience in various IT positions in
Australia, Africa, United States and Europe, her research interests
extend into the emerging field of Artificial Intelligence. She has
published on the topic of Performance and Control in Interna-
tional Non-Profit Organizations and is currently developing her
research profile. She also delivers a short-course on Artificial Intel-
ligence for Business.
Dr Rohail Hassan is a Senior Lecturer of Corporate Governance
and Finance/Director of Accreditation, Rankings, and Reputation
Management at Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Busi-
ness, Universiti Utara Malaysia, and Chartered Fellow: FCMI by
CMI, UK. Besides, Rohail is working as an Adjunct Professor of
Management at the University of Economics and Human Sciences
in Warsaw, Poland. Rohail is working as an Expert at the
European Commission for the Evaluation of Proposals in the
HORIZON-MSCA-2023 Call. His research interests include corpo-
rate governance, board diversity, gender diversity, ESG, Block-
chain and Artificial Intelligence in business, big data and analytics,
and strategy. The main research has been published in leading
management journals and top-tier peer-reviewed journals ABS
ranked like (e.g., Journal of Business Research (3*), Asia Pacific Jour-
nal of Management (3*), IEEE Transactions on Engineering Manage-
ment (3*), Technological Forecasting and Social Change (3*),
International Journal of Information Management (2*), Journal of
Management and Organization (2*), Maritime Policy & Management
(2*), Journal of Cleaner Production (2*), Journal of Intellectual Capital
(2*), Thunderbird International Business Review). He is currently
working as a Series Editor for the work titled “Big Data for Industry
4.0: Challenges and Applications”—by Taylor & Francis Group.
Prince Kofi Mensah holds an MSc degree in Development
Finance from the University of Ghana, has over 10 years' experi-
ence in the private sector with focus on entrepreneurship,
finance, business development, research, and SMEs. He is the
Director of Business and Research at AAMG Business Solutions
Ghana, a course facilitator and research consultant at Skill Central
Ghana, a Research Consultant at New York University-Centre for
Technology and Economic Development Ghana, and a Project
MENZIES ET AL. 199
Consultant at the Chamber of Agribusiness Ghana. He has practi-
cal experience in both quantitative and qualitative research.
Prince has published in Journal of Comparative International Man-
agement and provided review services for Journal of Entrepreneurship
in Emerging Economies. Prince made two presentations during the
Financial Innovation and Enterprise 2023 Conference organized
at the University of Professional Studies Accra (UPSA) with focus
on: (1) Sustainable Entrepreneurial Finance: creating a research
agenda through a systematic literature review, and (2) Entrepreneur-
ial education and training: Creating a research agenda through a sys-
tematic literature review.
How to cite this article: Menzies, J., Sabert, B., Hassan, R., &
Mensah, P. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence for international
business: Its use, challenges, and suggestions for future
research and practice. Thunderbird International Business
Review, 66(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22370
200 MENZIES ET AL.
Copyright of Thunderbird International Business Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
- Artificial intelligence for international business: Its use, challenges, and suggestions for future research and practice
- 1 INTRODUCTION
- 2 METHODOLOGY
- 3 THE USE OF AI IN IB
- 3.1 Innovation approaches in international business
- 3.2 International market selection
- 3.3 Entry mode choices
- 3.4 Foreign exchange in international business
- 3.5 Trade negotiations at an international level
- 3.6 Global supply chains and international operations
- 3.7 Sustainability in international business
- 3.8 International human resource management
- 3.9 Managing across cultures
- 3.10 International marketing
- 4 DISCUSSION
- 4.1 Challenges of using AI in IBs
- 4.2 Limitations and suggestions for future research
- 4.3 Managerial implications for IBs
- 5 CONCLUSIONS
- ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
- REFERENCES