Evidence-Based Poste

profileAGFOX
EBPPosterRubric.pdf

Evidence Based Practice Poster

Presenter: ______________________ Date: ___________

PICO Question: _________________________ Total Points: ___

Category 4 3 2 1

Significance/Backgrou

nd to the Problem

PICO Question

Identification

In-depth

coverage of

topic, topic is

relevant to

nursing practice

research-based

information,

outstanding

clarity, PICO

question

complete

Good coverage

of topic, topic is

appropriate to

nursing practice

basis in sound,

research-based

information,

PICO question

complete

Minimal

coverage of

topic, topic is

appropriate to

nursing practice,

PICO question

complete

Minimal to no

coverage of

topic, topic is

not relevant to

nursing practice,

not based on

research-based

information,

PICO

incomplete/ or

not included

Literature Appraisal

(Appendix G)

Minimum of 10

peer-reviewed

full text articles

written in last 5

years or less. All

articles are

relevant to EBP

problem and

provides clear

evidenced based

recommendation

s.

Minimum of 10

peer-reviewed

full texted

articles written

in 5 years or

less. 8-9 articles

relevant to EBP

problem and

provides clear

evidenced based

recommendation

s.

Minimum of 10

peer-reviewed

articles, full

texted articles,

articles written

in more than 5

years. 7-8

articles relevant

to EBP problem

and provides

clear evidenced

based

recommendation

s.

Less than 10

peer reviewed

full texted

articles written

in 5 years or

less. Less than 7

articles relevant

to EBP problem

and provides

clear evidenced

based

recommendation

s.

Project

Recommendations

Clear and

concise

summary of

evidenced based

recommendation

from appraisal

of articles. Two

recommendation

s to answer

PICO question.

Clear and

concise

summary of

evidenced based

recommendation

from appraisal of

articles. One

recommendation

to answer PICO

question.

Recommendatio

ns lacks

concision or may

be irrelevant to

PICO question.

One

recommendation

to answer PICO

question.

Recommendatio

n lacks

relevance to

PICO question,

or none given.

References

(Submitted with

Appendix G)

Reference page

in Word

document typed

in 12 font, APA

format for each

article.

Reference page

in Word

document typed

in 12 font, APA

format for each

article. Missing

references.

Reference page

in Word

document, typed

in 12 font, APA

format incorrect.

Missing

references.

Reference page

not included.

Slide (Poster)

Appearance

Attractive, easy

to interpret,

pleasing colors

with high

contrast, slide

presentation

well-organized,

excellent use of

bullets, and

graphics which

enhance the

presentation of

the content

Attractive, easy

to interpret,

pleasing colors

with good

contrast, slide

presentation

organized, good

use of bullets,

and graphics

which enhance

the presentation

of the content

Attractive,

difficult to

interpret,

pleasing colors

with high

contrast, slide

presentation

disorganized,

bullets, and

graphics detract

from the content

Unattractive,

difficult to

interpret, poor

color choice and

slide contrast,

slide

presentation

unorganized,

bullets, and

graphics detract

from the content

Grading Scale:

20 points = 100%

19 points = 98%

18 points = 96%

17 points = 93%

16 points= 90%

15 points = 87%

14 points = 84%

13 points = 81%

12 points = 79%

11 points = 77%

10 points = 75%

09 points = 73%

08 points = 70%

07 points = 68%

06 points = 66%

05 points = 64%