Evidence-Based Poste
Evidence Based Practice Poster
Presenter: ______________________ Date: ___________
PICO Question: _________________________ Total Points: ___
Category 4 3 2 1
Significance/Backgrou
nd to the Problem
PICO Question
Identification
In-depth
coverage of
topic, topic is
relevant to
nursing practice
research-based
information,
outstanding
clarity, PICO
question
complete
Good coverage
of topic, topic is
appropriate to
nursing practice
basis in sound,
research-based
information,
PICO question
complete
Minimal
coverage of
topic, topic is
appropriate to
nursing practice,
PICO question
complete
Minimal to no
coverage of
topic, topic is
not relevant to
nursing practice,
not based on
research-based
information,
PICO
incomplete/ or
not included
Literature Appraisal
(Appendix G)
Minimum of 10
peer-reviewed
full text articles
written in last 5
years or less. All
articles are
relevant to EBP
problem and
provides clear
evidenced based
recommendation
s.
Minimum of 10
peer-reviewed
full texted
articles written
in 5 years or
less. 8-9 articles
relevant to EBP
problem and
provides clear
evidenced based
recommendation
s.
Minimum of 10
peer-reviewed
articles, full
texted articles,
articles written
in more than 5
years. 7-8
articles relevant
to EBP problem
and provides
clear evidenced
based
recommendation
s.
Less than 10
peer reviewed
full texted
articles written
in 5 years or
less. Less than 7
articles relevant
to EBP problem
and provides
clear evidenced
based
recommendation
s.
Project
Recommendations
Clear and
concise
summary of
evidenced based
recommendation
from appraisal
of articles. Two
recommendation
s to answer
PICO question.
Clear and
concise
summary of
evidenced based
recommendation
from appraisal of
articles. One
recommendation
to answer PICO
question.
Recommendatio
ns lacks
concision or may
be irrelevant to
PICO question.
One
recommendation
to answer PICO
question.
Recommendatio
n lacks
relevance to
PICO question,
or none given.
References
(Submitted with
Appendix G)
Reference page
in Word
document typed
in 12 font, APA
format for each
article.
Reference page
in Word
document typed
in 12 font, APA
format for each
article. Missing
references.
Reference page
in Word
document, typed
in 12 font, APA
format incorrect.
Missing
references.
Reference page
not included.
Slide (Poster)
Appearance
Attractive, easy
to interpret,
pleasing colors
with high
contrast, slide
presentation
well-organized,
excellent use of
bullets, and
graphics which
enhance the
presentation of
the content
Attractive, easy
to interpret,
pleasing colors
with good
contrast, slide
presentation
organized, good
use of bullets,
and graphics
which enhance
the presentation
of the content
Attractive,
difficult to
interpret,
pleasing colors
with high
contrast, slide
presentation
disorganized,
bullets, and
graphics detract
from the content
Unattractive,
difficult to
interpret, poor
color choice and
slide contrast,
slide
presentation
unorganized,
bullets, and
graphics detract
from the content
Grading Scale:
20 points = 100%
19 points = 98%
18 points = 96%
17 points = 93%
16 points= 90%
15 points = 87%
14 points = 84%
13 points = 81%
12 points = 79%
11 points = 77%
10 points = 75%
09 points = 73%
08 points = 70%
07 points = 68%
06 points = 66%
05 points = 64%