EARLY CHILDHOOD PROJECT
EDUC 210
Early Childhood Project Grading Rubric
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
Points Earned |
|||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
|
PowerPoint |
|||||
Depth of content; consistent with chosen topic; 10–15-slide length requirement |
9 to 10 pointsFollows the submitted topic plan. |
7 to 8 pointsTopic plan is mostly followed. |
5 to 6 pointsTopic plan is loosely followed. |
0 to 4 pointsDoes not follow the submitted topic plan. |
|
Professional quality of project |
9 to 10 pointsInformation is very organized with well-constructed slides. |
7 to 8 points Information is organized with well-constructed slides. |
5 to 6 points Information is organized, but slides are not well-constructed. |
0 to 4 pointsThe information is poorly formed, appears to be disorganized. |
|
Format: includes cover slide, content, conclusion, and references |
9 to 10 pointsIncludes all 4 aspects. |
7 to 8 points Includes 3 aspects. |
5 to 6 points Includes 2 aspects. |
0 to 4 pointsIncludes 1 or no aspects. |
|
Project: Use of technology (be creative with graphics, transitions and slide design ) |
9 to 10 pointsMultiple creative aspects evident. |
7 to 8 points At least 2 technology components evident. |
5 to 6 points 1 technology component evident. |
0 to 4 pointsNone present; text only. |
|
Spelling and grammar |
9 to 10 pointsNo grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
7 to 8 points Almost no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
5 to 6 points Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
0 to 4 pointsMany grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
|
Current APA Format: References and citations |
9 to 10 pointsReference slide with citations present. |
7 to 8 points Reference slide present; no citations. |
5 to 6 points
|
0 to 4 pointsNo reference slide or citations present. |
|
Includes NAEYC standards |
9 to 10 pointsStandards stated and cited in the presentation. |
7 to 8 points
|
5 to 6 points Standards stated but not cited in the presentation. |
0 to 4 pointsStandards not stated. |
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
Points Earned |
|||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
|
Paper |
|||||
Depth of content; consistent with assigned topic; 3-page length requirement |
9 to 10 pointsFollows the submitted topic plan. |
7 to 8 points Mostly follows the submitted topic plan. |
5 to 6 points Loosely follows the submitted topic plan. |
0 to 4 pointsDoes not follow the submitted topic plan. |
|
Professional quality of paper (presentation and format) |
9 to 10 pointsInformation is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs. Includes all current APA components |
7 to 8 points Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs but does not include all current APA components. |
5 to 6 points Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed and does not include any current APA components. |
0 to 4 pointsThe information is poorly formed, appears to be disorganized and no current APA components. |
|
Includes NAEYC standards |
9 to 10 pointsStandards stated and cited in the paper. |
7 to 8 points
|
5 to 6 points Standards stated but not cited in the paper. |
0 to 4 pointsStandards not stated. |
|
Spelling and grammar |
9 to 10 pointsNo grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
7 to 8 points Almost no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors |
5 to 6 points A few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
0 to 4 pointsMany grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
|
Correct APA format (minimum of 3 sources; cover and reference pages; 1 page of content; references cited) |
9 to 10 pointsAll 5 components present. |
7 to 8 points Missing 1 component. |
5 to 6 points Missing 2 or more components. |
0 to 4 pointsNone present. |
|
Total |
|
Page 1 of 2