523: CLC: Collaborative Learning Communities
Darius9
EAD-523-T3-CLCParticipantEvalTool.docx
CLC Participant Evaluation Tool
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
SELF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Student name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the input received from this group member in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Quantity – Did work submitted fulfill the portion of the assignment they were requested to complete? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Quality – Was the work submitted of sufficient quality to be include in the final product, with little or no revision? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Timeliness – Was work submitted in the timeframe requested? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments: |
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
